Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:04:33.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Five-year-olds' understanding of ‘savoir’ and ‘croire’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Dominique Bassano
Dominique Bassano
Affiliation:
Centre d'Etude des Processus cognitifs et du Langage, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interpretation of French statements involving the verbs savoir (‘to know’) and croire (‘to think’) was studied in a group of children aged from 4; 1 to 1. The experiment consisted in asking subjects to attribute four sentences (‘I know that P’, ‘I know that not-P’, ‘I do not know if P’, ‘I think that P’) to fictitious speakers (dolls placed in various situations of knowledge). Results enable us to infer levels of understanding, to locate the main difficulties in the processing of each statement, and to bring out recurrent confusions between the expressions. These results are interpreted as the expression of the processes contributing to the elaboration of ‘modalization’ in the child.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 417 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bassano, D. (1982). Etude sur la modalité croire: interprétation d'énoncés avec croire que…chez des enfants de 6 à 11 ans. Archives de Psychologie 50. 165–90.Google Scholar
Bassano, D. & Champaud, C. (1983). L'interprétation d'énoncés modaux assertifs (savoir que…) chez l'enfant de 6 à 11 ans. L'Année Psychologique 83. 53–73.Google Scholar
Champaud, C. & Bassano, D. (1984). L'interprétation d'énoncés avec savoir si…chez des enfants de 6 à 11 ans: le rôle de marques liées à la modalisation (si/que). Bulletin de Psychologie 23 (364), 299–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culioli, A. (1978). Valeurs modales et opérations énonciatrices. Le Français Moderne 46. 300–17.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. (1979). Les lois du discours. Langue française 42. 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franckel, J. J. (1981). Modalités, détermination et opérations énonciatives. Bulletin de Linguistique Générate et Appliquée 8. 108–56.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. N. (1982). Acquisition of mental verbs and the concept of mind. In Kuczaj, S. (ed.). Language development. Vol. 1: Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. N. & Maratsos, M. P. (1977). Early comprehension of mental verbs: think and know. ChDev 48. 1743–7.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. N. & Wellman, H. M. (1980). Children's developing understanding of mental verbs: remember, know and guess. ChDev 51. 1095–1102.Google Scholar
Lehalle, H. & Jouen, F. (1978). Quelques verbes d'opinion et leur présupposition: étude génétique de leur compréhension chez léadolescent. Enfance 4–5. 237–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNamara, J., Baker, E. & Olson, C. E. (1976). Four-year-old's understanding of pretend, forget and know. ChDev 47. 62–70.Google Scholar
Miscione, J. L., Marvin, R. S., O'Brien, R. G. & Greenberg, M. T. (1978). A developmental study of preschool children's understanding of the words know and guess. ChDev 49. 1107–13.Google Scholar
Oléron, P. & Legros, S. (1977). Présuppositions, implications linguistiques et atteinte de la signification de termes psychologiques par l'enfant. Journal de Psychologie normale et pathologique 4. 409–29.Google Scholar
Richards, M. M. (1982). Empiricism and learning to mean. In Kuczaj, S. (ed.), Language development. Vol. 1: Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. & Johnson, C. N. (1979). Understanding of mental processes: a developmental study of remember and forget. ChDev 50. 79–88.Google Scholar