Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:57:05.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extended Statistical Learning as an account for slow vocabulary growth*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2011

STEPHANIE F. STOKES ,
SOPHIE KERN  and
CHRISTOPHE DOS SANTOS
STEPHANIE F. STOKES*
Affiliation:
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
SOPHIE KERN
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de l'Homme, Lyon
CHRISTOPHE DOS SANTOS
Affiliation:
Unité Imagerie et Cerveau Inserm U930, Université François Rabelais de Tours
*
[*]Address for correspondence: Stephanie F. Stokes, Department of Communication Disorders, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stokes (2010) compared the lexicons of English-speaking late talkers (LT) with those of their typically developing (TD) peers on neighborhood density (ND) and word frequency (WF) characteristics and suggested that LTs employed learning strategies that differed from those of their TD peers. This research sought to explore the cross-linguistic validity of this conclusion. The lexicons (production, not recognition) of 208 French-speaking two-year-old children were coded for ND and WF. Regression revealed that ND and WF together predicted 62% of the variance in vocabulary size, with ND and WF uniquely accounting for 53% and 9% of that variance respectively. Epiphenomenal findings were ruled out by comparison of simulated data sets with the actual data. A generalized Mann–Whitney test showed that children with small vocabularies had significantly higher ND values and significantly lower WF values than children with large vocabularies. An extended statistical learning theory is proposed to account for the findings.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 105 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (2008). What statistical learning can and can't tell us about language acquisition. In Colombo, J., McCardle, P. & Freund, L. (eds), Infant pathways to language: Methods, models and research directions, 15–29. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Batagelj, V. & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek: A program for large network analysis. Connections 2, 47–57, available at <http://pajek.imfm.si/doku.php> accessed 10 December 2010.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., Price, T. S., Dale, P. S. & Plomin, R. (2003). Outcomes of early language delay: II. Etilogy of transient and persistent language difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46, 561–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, A. E. & Waxman, S. R. (2008). Taking stock as theories of word learning take shape. Developmental Sciences 11, 185–94.Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, J. & Luce, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of words in young children's lexicons. Journal of Child Language 17, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, M. H., Onnis, L. & Hockema, S. A. (2009). The secret is in the sound: From unsegmented speech to lexical categories. Developmental Science 12, 388–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coady, J. A. & Aslin, R. N. (2003). Phonological neighbourhoods in the developing lexicon. Journal of Child Language 30, 441–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, P. S. & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 28, 125–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cara, B. & Goswami, U. (2002). Similarity relations among spoken words: The special status of rimes in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34, 416–23.Google Scholar
Desmarais, C., Sylvestre, A., Meyer, F., Bairati, I. & Rouleau, N. (2008). Systematic review of the literature on characteristics of late-talking toddlers. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 43, 361–89.Google Scholar
Dollaghan, C. A. (1994). Children's phonological neighbourhoods: Half empty or half full? Journal of Child Language 21, 257–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P. et al. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S. & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual, 2nd edn.Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Fourgeron, C. & Smith, C. L. (1999). French. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 78–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Science 3, 410–19.Google Scholar
Gierut, J. A. & Dale, R. A. (2007). Comparability of lexical corpora: Word frequency in phonological generalization. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 21, 423–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S. & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parent input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 35, 515–31.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. B. & Comrie, B. (eds)2008. The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available online at <http://wals.info/feature/1> accessed 21 January, 2010.Google Scholar
Hohle, B., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Herold, B., Weissenborn, J. & Nazzi, T. (2009). Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: Evidence from German and French infants. Infant Behavior and Development 32, 262–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A. & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 630–45.Google Scholar
Kern, S. (2003). Le compte-rendu parental au service de l'évaluation de la production lexicale des enfants français entre 16 et 30 mois. Glossa 85, 48–62.Google Scholar
Kern, S. & Gayraud, F. (2010). IFDC. Grenoble: Les editions la cigale.Google Scholar
Klee, T. & Harrison, C. (2001). CDI Words and Sentences: Validity and preliminary norms for British English. Paper presented at Child Language Seminar, University of Hertfordshire, England.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 5, 831–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M. & Nelson, T. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363, 979–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladefoged, P. (1999). American English. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 41–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lany, J. & Saffran, J. R. (2010). From statistics to meaning: Infants' acquisition of lexical categories. Psychological Science 21, 284–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luce, P. A. & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing 19, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddieson, I. (2008a). Consonant inventories. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie, B. (eds), Chapter 1. Available online at <http://wals.info/feature/1> accessed 21 January 2010.+accessed+21+January+2010.>Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (2008b). Consonant−vowel ratio. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie, B. (eds), Chapter 3. Available online at <http://wals.info/feature/1> accessed 21 January 2010.+accessed+21+January+2010.>Google Scholar
Mirman, D., Graf Estes, K. & Magnuson, J. S. (2010). Computational modeling of statistical learning: Effects of transitional probability vs. frequency and links to word learning. Infancy 15, 471–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munson, B. & Solomon, N. P. (2004). The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 1048–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J. & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics 28, 661–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odeh, R. E. (1972). The generalized Mann−Whitney U-Statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 21, 348–51.Google Scholar
Paul, R. (1996). Clinical implications of the natural history of slow expressive language development. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 5, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, L. (2002). Language and reading outcomes to age 9 in late-talking toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45, 360–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffran, J. R. (2002). Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 172–96.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12, 110–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J. R. (2009). What is statistical learning, and what statistical learning is not. In Johnson, S. (ed.), Neuroconstructivism, 180–95. Oxford Scholarship Online Monographs.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R. & Graf Estes, K. (2006). Mapping sound to meaning: Connections between learning about sounds and learning about words. Advances in Child Development and behavior 34, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarborough, R. A. (2004). Coarticulation and the structure of the lexicon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Available at <www.linguistics.ucla.edu/faciliti/research/scarb_diss.pdf>; accessed 7 May 2009.;+accessed+7+May+2009.>Google Scholar
Stokes, S. F. (2010). Neighborhood density and word frequency in toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53, 670–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokes, S. F. & Klee, T. (2009). Factors that influence vocabulary development in two-year-old children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 50, 498–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokes, S. F., Wong, A. M-Y., Fletcher, P. & Leonard, L. B. (2006). Nonword repetition and sentence repetition as clinical markers of specific language impairment: The case of Cantonese. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49, 219–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storkel, H. L. (2004). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 25, 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. L. (2008). First utterances. In Rickheit, G. & Strohner, H. (eds), Handbook of communication competence, 125–47. Berlin: Mouten de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Storkel, H. L. (2009). Developmental differences in the effects of phonological, lexical and semantic variables on word learning by infants. Journal of Child Language 36, 291–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuart, G. P. & Hulme, C. (2009). Lexical and semantic influences on immediate serial recall: A role for redintegration. In Thorne, A. & Page, M. (eds), Interactions between short-term and long-term memory in the verbal domain, 157–76. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Swingley, D. (2003). Phonetic detail in the developing lexicon. Language and Speech 46, 265–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. (2005). Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary. Cognitive Psychology 50, 86–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiessen, E. D., Hill, E. A. & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy 7, 53–71.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S. (2008). What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51, 408–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, R. (2004). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In Local, J., Ogden, R. & Temple, R. (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI, 75–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zamuner, T. S. (2009). The structure and nature of phonological neighborhoods in children's early lexicons. Journal of Child Language 36, 3–21.Google Scholar