Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:38:22.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examining the associations between children's receptive language skills and developmental domains in the United States and Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2019

Tulin GULER YILDIZ ,
Mubeccel GONEN ,
Ayca ULKER ERDEM ,
Aileen GARCIA ,
Helen RAIKES ,
Ibrahim H. ACAR ,
Firdevs BURCAK ,
Figen TURAN ,
Sadiye CAN GUL  and
Dawn DAVIS
Tulin GULER YILDIZ
Affiliation:
Department of Early Childhood Education, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Mubeccel GONEN
Affiliation:
Department of Early Childhood Education, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Ayca ULKER ERDEM*
Affiliation:
Department of Early Childhood Education, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Aileen GARCIA
Affiliation:
Department of Counseling and Human Development, South Dakota State University, USA
Helen RAIKES
Affiliation:
Department of Child, Youth and Family Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA
Ibrahim H. ACAR
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Ozyegin University, Turkey
Firdevs BURCAK
Affiliation:
Department of Early Childhood Education, Istanbul University – Cerrahpasa, Turkey
Figen TURAN
Affiliation:
Department of Child Development, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Sadiye CAN GUL
Affiliation:
Department of Early Childhood Education, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Dawn DAVIS
Affiliation:
Department of Child, Youth and Family Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Hacettepe University, Department of Early Childhood Education, Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey, 06800. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the relations between receptive language development and other developmental domains of preschoolers from low-income families, through an inter-cultural perspective involving the United States and Turkey. A total of 471 children and their caregivers participated in Turkey, while 287 participated in the United States. Children's development was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire for both samples. Different versions of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test were used for Turkish and US samples, to measure receptive language development. Results revealed similar patterns, with some differences, between the two countries. Receptive language predicted only communication and personal–social scales in the Turkish sample, while the US children's receptive language skills were associated with communication, problem solving, personal–social, and fine and gross motor development scales. These results were discussed in the context of each country, and the comparative conclusions contribute to the extant literature by illustrating the importance of language for three domains.

Keywords

receptive languagepreschoolerscross-cultural research
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 480 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acar, I. H. (2016). Examining the temperamental effortful control, extraversion, and negative affectivity as predictors of children's social competence. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(3), 681–98.Google Scholar
ADA (Ankara Development Agency) (2014). Ankara regional plan. Retrieved from http://www.ankaraka.org.tr/tr/ankara-bolge-plani-2014-2023_295.html on 1 February 2016.Google Scholar
Administration for Children and Families (2002). Making a difference in the lives of infants and toddlers and their families, Volume 1: Final technical report. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/making-a-difference-in-the-lives-of-infants-and-toddlers-and-their-families-0 on 16 April 2018.Google Scholar
Alat, Z., Akgumus, O., & Cavali, D. (2012). Okul oncesi egitimde acık hava etkinliklerine yonelik ogretmen tutum ve uygulamalari [Teachers’ views and practices towards outdoor activities in early childhood education]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3), 47–62.Google Scholar
Baydar, N., Akcinar, B., & Imer, N. (2012). Çevre, Sosyoekonomik Bağlam ve Ana Babalık [Enviroment, socioeconomic context and parenting]. In Sayıl, M. & Yagmurlu, B. (Eds.), Anababalık: Kuram ve Araştırma [Parenting: theory and Research] (pp. 81–128). Istanbul: Koc University Publishing.Google Scholar
Baydar, N., Kuntay, A. C., Yagmurlu, B., Aydemir, N., Cankaya, D., Goksen, F., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2014). ‘It takes a village’ to support the vocabulary development of children with multiple risk factors. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1014–25.Google Scholar
Bayraktar, F. (2009). Cultural and environmental effects on study of cognitive development. TRNC Journal of National Education, 3, 31–40.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E., & Edwards, J. (2000). The ontogeny of phonological categories and the primacy of lexical learning in linguistic development. Child Development, 71(1), 240–9.Google Scholar
Bekman, S., Aksu-Koc, A., & Erguvanli-Taylan, E. (2012). Altı yaşındaki çocuklara yönelik bir müdahale programının etkisi: Bir yaz okulu modeli [Effectiveness of an intervention program for six-year-olds: a summer-school model]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(70), 48–60.Google Scholar
Benjamin, L. (1993). Parents' literacy and their children's success in school: recent research, promising practices, and research implications. Education Research Report, 2–5. Retrieved from <https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED363441> on 16 March 2016.+on+16+March+2016.>Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Haynes, M. O., & Painter, K. M. (1998). Sources of child vocabulary competence: a multivariate model. Journal of Child Language, 25(2), 367–93.Google Scholar
Bridges, A. (1979). Directing two-year-olds’ attention: some clues to understanding. Journal of Child Language, 6(2), 211–26.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of child development. In Damon, W. and Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 993–1028). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1985). The role of interaction formats in language acquisition. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Language and social situations (pp. 31–46). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Coll, C. G., & Magnusson, K. (1999). Cultural influences on child development: Are we ready for a paradigm shift? In Masten, A. S. (Ed.), Cultural processes in child development: the Minnesota symposia on child psychology (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Demirel, F., Uner, A., & Kirimi, E. (2001). Van ili kırsalındaki annelerin çocuk beslenmesindeki alışkanlıkları ve uygulamaları [Breast feeding and supplementary food patterns urban area in Van]. Van Tıp Dergisi, 8(1), 18–22.Google Scholar
Ege, P., Acarlar, F., & Guleryuz, F. (1998). Türkçe kazanımında yaş ve ortalama sözce uzunluğunun (OSU) ilişkisi [The relation between age and mean length of utterance in acquisition of Turkish]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 13(41), 19–33.Google Scholar
Ergin, B. (2012). 5–6 yaş çocuklarının dil gelişim düzeyleri ile sosyal kabul durumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between language development levels and social acknowledgment situations of 5–6-year-old children]. Unpublished master's thesis, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.Google Scholar
Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235–84.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., Choi, S., & Baumberger, T. (1996). Cross-linguistic differences in early semantic and cognitive development. Cognitive Development, 11(2), 197–227.Google Scholar
Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Guler, T., & Donmez, N. B. (2007). 48–72 aylar arasındaki Türk çocuklarının alıcı dil gelişim düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Review of receptive language levels of Turkish children between 48–72 months]. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 7(27), 83–96.Google Scholar
Hancock, T. B., Kaiser, A. P., & Delaney, E. M. (2002). Teaching parents of preschoolers at high risk strategies to support language and positive behavior. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22(4), 191–212.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society, 11(2), 49–76.Google Scholar
Hebert-Myers, H., Guttentag, C. L., Swank, P. R., Smith, K. E., & Landry, S. H. (2006). The importance of language, social, and behavioral skills across early and later childhood as predictors of social competence with peers. Applied Developmental Science, 10(4), 174–87.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (2000). Policies to foster human capital. Research in Economics, 54(1), 3–56.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (2006). A broader view of what education policy should be. In Watt, N. F., Ayoub, C., Bradley, R. H., Puma, J. E., & LeBoeuf, W. A. (Eds.), The crisis in youth mental health: critical issues and effective programs. Early intervention programs (vol. 4) (pp. 3–26). Westport, CN: Praeger.Google Scholar
Heckman, J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P. (2013). Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2052–86.Google Scholar
Hill, E. L. (2000). Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: a review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36(2), 149–71.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74(5), 1368–78.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26(1), 55–88.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). The relation of birth order and socioeconomic status to children's language experience and language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(4), 603–29.Google Scholar
Ipek, N., & Bilgin, A. (2007). Primary school students’ vocabulary development. Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 344–65.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M. (2010). Developing language in a developing body: the relationship between motor development and language development. Journal of Child Language, 37(2), 229–61.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M., & Braddock, B. A. (2011). Gesture and motor skill in relation to language in children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54(1), 72–86.Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M., & Thelen, E. (1999). Hand, mouth and brain: the dynamic emergence of speech and gesture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11/12), 19–40.Google Scholar
Kagitcibasi, C. (1970). Social norms and authoritarianism: a Turkish–American comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(3), 444–51.Google Scholar
Kagitcibasi, C. (2007). Family, self and human development across cultures: theory and applications (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kagitcibasi, C. (2012). Family, self, and human development (3rd ed.). Istanbul: Koc University Publishing.Google Scholar
Kagitcibasi, C., & Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children, family and self: a three decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(3), 317–37.Google Scholar
Kagitcibasi, C., Sunar, D., Bekman, S., Baydar, N., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2009). Continuing effects of early enrichment in adult life: the Turkish early enrichment project 22 years later. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 764–79.Google Scholar
Kapci, E. G., Kucuker, S., & Uslu, R. I. (2010). How applicable are Ages and Stages Questionnaires for use with Turkish children? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30(3), 176–88.Google Scholar
KENPRO (2010). Theories of teaching language to children. KENPRO Online Papers Portal. Retrieved from http://www.kenpro.org/papers/theories-of-teaching-language-to-children-2010.htm#_Toc274919057 on 23 January 2018.Google Scholar
Klebanov, P. K., Brooks-Gunn, J., Chase-Lansdale, P. L., & Gordon, R. (1997). Are neighborhood effects on young children mediated by features of the home environment? In Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., & Aber, J. L. (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Vol. 1. Context and consequences for children (pp. 119–45). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., Coy, K., & Murray, K. (2001). The development of self-regulation in the first four years of life. Child Development, 72(4), 1091–11.Google Scholar
Kyttälä, M., Aunio, P., Lepola, J., & Hautamäki, J. (2014). The role of the working memory and language skills in the prediction of word problem solving in 4- to 7-year-old children. Educational Psychology, 34(6), 674–96.Google Scholar
Landry, S. H., Miller-Loncar, C. L., Smith, K. E., & Swank, P. R. (2002). The role of early parenting in children's development of executive processes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 21(1), 15–41.Google Scholar
Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E., & Swank, P. R. (2009). New directions in evaluating social problem solving in childhood: early precursors and links to adolescent social competence. In Lewis, C. & Carpendale, J. I. M. (Eds.), Social interaction and the development of executive function (New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 123) (pp. 51–68). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lawrence, V. W. (1997). Middle- and working-class Black and White children's speech during a picture-labeling task. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158(2), 226–40.Google Scholar
Longoria, A. Q., Page, M. C., Hubbs-Tait, L., & Kennison, S. M. (2009). Relationship between kindergarten children's language ability and social competence. Early Child Development and Care, 179(7), 919–29.Google Scholar
Love, J. M., Chazan-Cohen, R., Raikes, H., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2013). What makes a difference: early Head Start evaluation findings in a developmental context. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(1), 1–73.Google Scholar
Magill-Evans, J., & Harrison, M. J. (2001). Parent–child interactions, parenting stress, and developmental outcomes at 4 years. Children's Health Care, 30(2), 135–50.Google Scholar
Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., Burchinal, M., Early, D. M., & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children's development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–49.Google Scholar
McCabe, P. C. (2005). Social and behavioral correlates of preschoolers with specific language impairment. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 337–87.Google Scholar
McCabe, P. C., & Meller, P. J. (2004). The relationship between language and social competence: how language impairment affects social growth. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 313–22.Google Scholar
McCardle, P., & Chhabra, V. (2004). The voice of evidence in reading research. Baltimore. MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Metin Orta, I., Corapci, F., Yagmurlu, B., & Aksan, N. (2013). Mediational role of effortful control and emotion dysregulation in the link between maternal responsiveness and Turkish preschoolers’ social competency and externalizing symptoms. Infant and Child Development, 22(5), 459–79.Google Scholar
Muslugume, E. (2016). Dil gelişimini destekleyici ebeveyn eğitim programinin sosyo ekonomik düzeyi düşük ailelerin çocuklarinin dil gelişimine etkisi [The effects of parents education program promoting language development of socio economic level low parents children]. Unpublished master's thesis, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Denizli.Google Scholar
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2012). Mplus users’ guide: statistical analysis with latent variables (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
Nærland, T. (2011). Language competence and social focus among preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 181(5), 599–612.Google Scholar
Nwora, A. J., & Gee, B. M. (2009). A case study of a five-year-old child with pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified using sound-based interventions. Occupational Therapy International, 16(1), 25–43.Google Scholar
Odom, S. L., McConnell, S. R., & Brown, W. H. (2008). Social competence of young children: conceptualization, assessment and influences. In Brown, W., Odom, S., & McConnell, S. (Eds.), Social competence of young children: risk, disability & intervention (pp. 3–30). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Olgan, R., & Kahriman-Ozturk, D. (2011). An investigation in the playgrounds of public and private preschools in Ankara. Education & Science, 36(161), 85–97.Google Scholar
Oner, N. (2008). Türkiye'de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testler: Bir Basvuru Kaynağı [Psychological tests used in Turkey: a reference guide] (2nd ed.). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Oneren-Sendil, C., & Tantekin-Erden, F. (2014). Peer preference: a way of evaluating social competence and behavioral well-being in early childhood. Early Child Development and Care, 184(2), 230–46.Google Scholar
Pae, H. K., & Greenberg, D. (2014). The relationship between receptive and expressive subskills of Academic L2 Proficiency in nonnative speakers of English: a multigroup approach. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 221–59.Google Scholar
Redmond, S. M., & Rice, M. L. (2002). Stability of behavioral ratings of children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 45(1), 190–201.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L. (2008). Child-directed speech: relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development, and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35, 185–205.Google Scholar
Sarilar, A., Matthews, D., & Kuntay, A. (2015). Hearing relative clauses boosts relative clause usage (and referential clarity) in young Turkish language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 175–202.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15(1), 163–91.Google Scholar
Sevimli-Celik, S., Kirazci, S., & Ince, L. (2011). Preschool movement education in Turkey: perceptions of preschool administrators and parents. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(5), 323–33.Google Scholar
Sheridan, S. M., Knoche, L., Edwards, C. P., Bovaird, J. A., & Kupzyk, K. A. (2010). Parent engagement and school readiness: effects of the getting ready intervention on preschool children's social-emotional competencies. Early Education & Development, 21(1). 125–56.Google Scholar
Slack Hines, P. (2001). The relationship between receptive language skills and school readiness. Theses, Dissertations and Capstones, 850. Retrieved from http://mds.marshall.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1851&context=etd on 3 April 2018.Google Scholar
Squires, J., & Bricker, D. (2009). Ages & Stages Questionnaires (3rd ed.) (ASQ-3). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Squires, J., Bricker, D., & Potter, L. (1997). Revision of a parent-completed developmental screening tool: ages and stages questionnaires. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22(3), 313–28.Google Scholar
Sticht, T. G., & McDonald, B. A. (1990). Teach the mother and reach the child: literacy across generations. Literacy lessons. Geneva: International Bureau of Education.Google Scholar
Taner, M., & Basal, H. A. (2005). Farklı sosyoekonomik düzeylerde okulöncesi eğitimi alan ve almayan ilköğretim birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin dil gelişimlerinin cinsiyete göre karşılaştırılması [Compare language development in first grade primary school students from different socioeconomic levels who take and do not take pre-school education according to the gender]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 395–420.Google Scholar
Tomatis, T. A. (1991). The conscious ear: my life of transformation through listening. New York: Station Hill Press.Google Scholar
Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.Google Scholar
TUIK (Turkish Statistical Institute) (2013). Ankara with selected indicators. Ankara: Turkiye Istatistik Kurumu Matbaası.Google Scholar
UNICEF (2013). Why early childhood development? Retrieved from HYPERLINK <http://www.unicef.org/earlychildhood/index_40748.html> on 10 May 2016.+on+10+May+2016.>Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development A/RES/70/1. Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/291/89/PDF/N1529189.pdf?OpenElement on 3 February 2018.Google Scholar
Uzundag, A. B., & Kuntay, A. C. (2018). Children's referential communication skills: the role of cognitive abilities and adult models of speech. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 172, 73–95.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In Gauvain, M. & Cole, M. (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 34–40). New York: Scientific American Books.Google Scholar
Walle, E. A., & Campos, J. J. (2014). Infant language development is related to the acquisition of walking. Developmental Psychology, 50, 336–48.Google Scholar
Wang, M. V, Lekhal, R., Aaro, L. E., Holte, A., & Schjolberg, S. (2014). The developmental relationship between language and motor performance from 3 to 5 years of age: a prospective longitudinal population study. BMC Psychology, 2(34), 1–10.Google Scholar
Yagmurlu, B., Citlak, B., Dost, A., & Leyendecker, B. (2009). Türk annelerin çocuk sosyalleştirme hedeflerinde eğitime bağlı olarak gözlemlenen farklılıklar [Child socialization goals of Turkish mothers: an investigation of education related within-culture variation]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 1–19.Google Scholar
Yazejian, N., Bryant, D., Freel, K., Burchinal, M., & the Educare Learning Network Investigative Team (2015). High-quality early education: age of entry and time in care differences in student outcomes for English-only and dual language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 23–39.Google Scholar
Yildiz Cicekler, C., & Sen, M. (2010). 6–7 yaş çocuklarinin resimlerden oluşturduklari öykülerdeki dil yapilari [Language structures of the 6–7-year-old children in stories made from pictures]. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 18(2), 363–78.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, S. (2016). Outdoor environment and outdoor activities in early childhood education. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 12(1), 423–37.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Jin, X., Shen, X., Zhang, J., & Hoff, E. (2008). Correlates of early language development in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(2), 145–51.Google Scholar