Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Theakston, Anna L
2004.
The role of entrenchment in children’s and adults’ performance on grammaticality judgment tasks.
Cognitive Development,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
15.
Kempe, Vera
Brooks, Patricia J.
Gillis, Steven
and
Samson, Graham
2007.
Diminutives facilitate word segmentation in natural speech: Cross-linguistic evidence.
Memory & Cognition,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 4,
p.
762.
Wonnacott, Elizabeth
Newport, Elissa L.
and
Tanenhaus, Michael K.
2008.
Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language.
Cognitive Psychology,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
165.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2008.
Negative entrenchment: A usage-based approach to negative evidence.
Cognitive Linguistics,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
Befi-Lopes, Debora Maria
and
Cáceres, Ana Manhani
2009.
Verificação da morfologia verbal em pré-escolares falantes do Português Brasileiro.
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 4,
p.
470.
Courtney, Ellen H.
2010.
Learning the Meaning of Verbs: Insights from Quechua.
First Language,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1,
p.
56.
Hsu, Anne S.
and
Chater, Nick
2010.
The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition: A Probabilistic Perspective.
Cognitive Science,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 6,
p.
972.
Goldberg, Adele E.
2011.
Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption.
cogl,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 1,
p.
131.
Ambridge, Ben
Pine, Julian M.
and
Rowland, Caroline F.
2011.
Children use verb semantics to retreat from overgeneralization errors: A novel verb grammaticality judgment study.
cogl,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 2,
p.
303.
Suttle, Laura
and
Goldberg, Adele E.
2011.
The partial productivity of constructions as induction.
Linguistics,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 6,
Boyd, Jeremy K.
Ackerman, Farrell
and
Kutas, Marta
2012.
Adult learners use both entrenchment and preemption to infer grammatical constraints.
p.
1.
Ambridge, Ben
Pine, Julian M.
and
Rowland, Caroline F.
2012.
Semantics versus statistics in the retreat from locative overgeneralization errors.
Cognition,
Vol. 123,
Issue. 2,
p.
260.
Ambridge, Ben
2013.
How Do Children Restrict Their Linguistic Generalizations? An (Un‐)Grammaticality Judgment Study.
Cognitive Science,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 3,
p.
508.
Ambridge, Ben
Pine, Julian M.
Rowland, Caroline F.
Chang, Franklin
and
Bidgood, Amy
2013.
The retreat from overgeneralization in child language acquisition: word learning, morphology, and verb argument structure.
WIREs Cognitive Science,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
p.
47.
Cadório, Inês
Lousada, Marisa
Aparici, Melina
and
Hall, Andreia
2014.
Assessment of Morphosyntactic Development in European Portuguese-Speaking Children.
Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 6,
p.
251.
Ambridge, Ben
Pine, Julian M.
Rowland, Caroline F.
Freudenthal, Daniel
and
Chang, Franklin
2014.
Avoiding dative overgeneralisation errors: semantics, statistics or both?.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
218.
Bidgood, Amy
Ambridge, Ben
Pine, Julian M.
Rowland, Caroline F.
and
Aronoff, Mark
2014.
The Retreat from Locative Overgeneralisation Errors: A Novel Verb Grammaticality Judgment Study.
PLoS ONE,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 5,
p.
e97634.
Robenalt, Clarice
and
Goldberg, Adele E.
2015.
Judgment evidence for statistical preemption: It is relatively better to vanish than to disappear a rabbit, but a lifeguard can equally well backstroke or swim children to shore.
Cognitive Linguistics,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
467.
Nagano, Tomonori
2015.
Acquisition of English verb transitivity by native speakers of Japanese
.
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
322.
Ambridge, Ben
Bidgood, Amy
Twomey, Katherine E.
Pine, Julian M.
Rowland, Caroline F.
Freudenthal, Daniel
and
Robin, Donald A.
2015.
Preemption versus Entrenchment: Towards a Construction-General Solution to the Problem of the Retreat from Verb Argument Structure Overgeneralization.
PLOS ONE,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 4,
p.
e0123723.