Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:09:24.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of coordination in the natural speech of young children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Barbara Lust  and
Cynthia A. Mervis
Barbara Lust
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Cynthia A. Mervis
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Natural speech of 32 young children from 2; 0 to 3; 1 (1·97 to 6·38 in MLU) was studied for evidence of use of coordination (by and). Analyses of the structure of coordinative expressions reflected development in structural variants as well as amount of coordination. Analyses suggested that early forms of coordination in natural speech reflected the same constraints which had been suggested by previous study of these children's language through an experimental elicited imitation task. A basis for a developmental theory of acquisition of coordination is sketched.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 279 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Address for correspondence: Dr Barbara Lust, Dept. HDFS, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. We thank Hermine Sinclair for critical advice.

References

REFERENCES

Ardery, A. (1978). On coordination in child language. Unpublished MS, Department of Linguistics, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Beilin, H. & Lust, B. (1975). A study of the development of logical and linguistic connectives. In Beilin, H. (ed), Studies in the cognitive basis of language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K. & Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. JChLang 7. 235–61.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Miller, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Variation and reduction as aspects of competence in language development. In Pick, A. (ed.), The 1974 Minnesota symposia on child psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1979). The acquisition of complex sentences. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Studies in language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1970). Psycholinguistics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P., Jacobsen, T. & Silva, M. (1976). The acquisition of conjunction: a cross-linguistic study. PRCLD 12. 71–80.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J., Flusberg, H. & Hakuta, K. (1977). Deciding among theories of development of coordination in child speech. PRCLD 13. 118–25.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E. (1971). Les relations temporelles dans le langage de l'enfant. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1969). Coordinating conjunctions in English. In Reibel, D. & Schane, S. (eds), Modern studies in English. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. (1977). Judgements of syntactic acceptability and frequency. Studia Linguistica 31. 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, J. (1971). Constraints on deletion in syntax. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
Harries, H. (1973). Coordination reduction. Stanford University Working Papers on Language Universals 11. 139–209.Google Scholar
Hood, L., Lahey, M., Lifter, K. & Bloom, L. (1978). Observational and descriptive methodology in studying child language: preliminary results in the development of complex sentences. In Sackett, G. (ed.), Observing behavior, Vol. 1. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Jeremy, R. J. (1978). Use of coordinate sentences with the conjunction and for describing temporal and locative relations between events. JPsycholingRes 7. 135–50.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. & Menn, I. (1977). On the acquisition of phonology. In Macnamara, J. (ed.), Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Limber, J. (1973) The genesis of complex sentences. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Limber, J. (1976). Unravelling competence, performance, and pragmatics in the speech of young children. JChLang 3. 309–18.Google Scholar
Lust, B. (1977). Conjunction reduction in child language. JChLang 4. 257–88.Google Scholar
Lust, B. (in press). Constraint in anaphora in first language. In Tavakolian, S. (ed.), First language acquisition and linguistic theory. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Lust, B. (1978). Constraint on anaphora in child language: a study of 6 languages. Unpublished MS, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Lust, B. & Barazangi, N. (1978). The structure of coordination in children's first language acquisition of Arabic. Paper presented to LSA meeting,University of Illinois,Champaign, Ill.Google Scholar
Lust, B. & Wakayama, T. (1979). The structure of coordination in children's first language acquisition of Japanese. In Eckman, F. & Hastings, A. (eds), Studies in first and second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Maling, J. (1972). On gapping and the order of constituents. LI 3. 101–8.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1964). Syntactic rules used by children from preschool through first grade. ChDev 35. 533–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Menyuk, P. (1969). Sentences children use. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1971). The acquisition and development of language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1970). Gapping and the order of constituents. In Bierwish, M. & Heidolph, K. (eds), Progress in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Schachter, P. (1977). Constraints on coordination. Lg 53. 86–103.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. & Welsh, C. (1973). Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental psycholinguistics. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (1970). An experimental approach to children's linguistic competence. In Hayes, J. (ed), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Solan, L. (1978). Anaphora in child language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Tavakolian, S. (1977). Structural principles in the acquisition of complex sentences. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Tavakolian, S. (1978). The conjoined clause analysis of relative clause and other structures. In Goodluck, H. & Solan, L. (eds), Papers in the structure and development of child language. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4.Google Scholar
Thieman, T. (1975). Imitation and recall of optionally deletable sentences by young children. JChLang 2. 261–9.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1978). Across-the-board rule application. LI 9. 31–43.Google Scholar