Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:45:46.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross-linguistic interaction in trilingual phonological development: the role of the input in the acquisition of the voicing contrast*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2014

ROBERT MAYR*
Affiliation:
Cardiff Metropolitan University, United Kingdom
SIMONA MONTANARI
Affiliation:
California State University, Los Angeles, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Centre for Speech and Language Therapy, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Llandaff Campus, Western Avenue, Cardiff CF5 2YB, United Kingdom. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper examines the production of word-initial stops by two simultaneous trilingual sisters, aged 6;8 and 8;1, who receive regular input in Italian and English from multiple speakers, but in Spanish from only one person. The children's productions in each language were analyzed acoustically and compared to those of their main input providers. The results revealed consistent cross-linguistic differences by both children, including between Italian and Spanish stops, although these have identical properties in the speech of Italian- and Spanish-speaking adults. While the children's English stops were largely target-like, their Italian stops exhibited non-target-like realizations in the direction of English, suggesting interactions. Interestingly, their Spanish productions were largely unaffected by cross-linguistic interactions, with target-like voiceless stops, and voiced stops predominantly realized as spirants. These findings raise interesting questions about phonological development in multilingual settings and demonstrate that the number and type of input providers may crucially affect cross-linguistic interactions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

We are grateful to Helen Pandeli and Mark Jones as well as JCL editors and reviewers for their useful comments. Thanks also go to the children and adults who participated in this research.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, G. (1985). How the young French child avoids the prevoicing problem for word-initial voiced stops. Journal of Child Language, 12, 3746.Google Scholar
Allen, J. S., & Miller, J. L. (2004). Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 31713183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amastae, J. (1995). Variable spirantization: constraint weighting in three dialects. Hispanic Linguistics, 6/7, 267285.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2011). The influence of child-directed speech on early trilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 8, 4262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). PRAAT: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1·31). Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam, online: <http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat> (last accessed 5 April 2010).Google Scholar
Bortolini, U., Zmarich, C., Fior, R., & Bonifacio, S. (1995). Word-initial voicing in the productions of stops in normal and preterm Italian infants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 31, 191206.Google Scholar
Branstine, Z. (1991). Stop–spirant alternations in Spanish: on the representations of contrast. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 21, 122.Google Scholar
Bullock, B. E., & Toribio, A. J. (2009). How to hit a moving target: on the sociophonetics of code-switching. In Isurin, L., Winford, D., & de Bot, K. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to code switching (pp. 189206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Byers-Heinlein, K. (2013). Parental language mixing: its measurement and the relation of mixed input to young bilingual children's vocabulary size. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 3248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldas, S. (2006). Raising bilingual biliterate children in monolingual cultures. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Carrasco, P., Hualde, J. I., & Simonet, M. (2012). Dialect differences in Spanish voiced stop obstruent allophony: Costa Rican versus Iberian Spanish. Phonetica, 69, 149179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 207229.Google Scholar
Cruz-Ferreira, M. (2006). Three is a crowd? Acquiring Portuguese in a trilingual environment. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Leeuw, E., Schmid, M., & Mennen, I. (2010). The effects of contact on native language pronunciation in an L2 migrant context. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 3340.Google Scholar
Deuchar, M., & Clark, A. (1996). Early bilingual acquisition of the voicing contrast in English and Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 351365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, G. J. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin/New York: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Döpke, S. (1998). Competing language structures: the acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German–English children. Journal of Child Language, 25, 555585.Google Scholar
Fabiano-Smith, L., & Bunta, F. (2012). Voice onset time of voiceless bilabial and velar stops in 3-year-old bilingual children and their age-matched monolingual peers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 26, 148163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in cross-language research (pp. 233277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 6783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandour, J., Petty, S., Dardarananda, R., Dechongkit, S., & Munkgoen, S. (1986). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in Thai: a study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language, 13, 561572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V., & Thomas, E. (2009). Bilingual first-language development: dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 213237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In Nicol, J. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: bilingual language processing (pp. 122). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heselwood, B., & McChrystal, L. (2000). Gender, accent features and voicing in Panjabi–English bilingual children. In Nelson, D. & Foulkes, P. (Eds.), Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 8, 4570.Google Scholar
Jansen, W. (2004). Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: a laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Groningen University.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M. M., Lleó, C., & Rakow, M. (2004). Voice onset time in bilingual German–Spanish children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 7188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khattab, G. (2000). VOT in English and Arabic bilingual and monolingual children. In Nelson, D. & Foulkes, P. (Eds.), Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 8, 95122.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H. M., Kuhl, P. K., & Tsao, F. M. (2003). An association between mother's speech clarity and infants’ speech discrimination skills. Developmental Science, 6, F1F10.Google Scholar
Mack, M. (1990). Phonetic transfer in a French–English bilingual child. In Nelde, P. H. (Ed.), Language attitude and language conflict (pp. 107124). Bonn: Dümmler.Google Scholar
MacKay, I., Flege, J. E., Piske, T., & Schirru, C. (2001). Category restructuring during second-language speech acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 516528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macken, M. A., & Barton, D. (1979). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: a study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language, 7, 4174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macken, M. A., & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in Spanish: a phonetic and phonological study of word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language, 7, 433458.Google Scholar
Martínez-Celdrán, E., & Regueira, X. L. (2008). Spirant approximants in Galician. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38, 5168.Google Scholar
Mayr, R., Howells, G., & Lewis, R. (2014). Asymmetries in phonological development: the case of word-final cluster acquisition in Welsh–English bilingual children. Journal of Child Language.Google ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, K. M., Evans, B. G., & Mahon, M. (2013). Acquiring a second language in an immigrant community: the production of Sylheti and English stops and vowels by London-Bengali speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 344358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, S. (2014). A case study of bi-literacy development among children enrolled in an Italian–English dual language program in Southern California. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17, 509525.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1997). The relation between phonetics and phonology. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Laver, J. (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 674694). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2000). Beyond ‘One system or two?’ Degrees of separation between the languages of French–English bilingual children. In Döpke, S. (Ed.), Cross-linguistic structures in simultaneous bilingualism (pp. 175200). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2011). Properties of dual language exposure that influence 2-year-olds’ bilingual proficiency. Child Development, 82(6), 18341849.Google Scholar
Rosner, B. S., López-Bascuas, L. E., Garíc-Albea, J. E., & Fahey, R. P. (2000). Voice-onset times for Castilian Spanish initial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 217224.Google Scholar
Simon, E. (2009). Acquiring a new L2 contrast: an analysis of the English laryngeal system of L1 Dutch speakers. Second Language Research, 25, 377408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, E. (2010). Child L2 development: a longitudinal case study on Voice Onset Times in word-initial stops. Journal of Child Language, 37, 159173.Google Scholar
Smith, R., & Hawkins, S. (2012). Production and perception of speaker-specific phonetic detail at word boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 213233.Google Scholar
Thiessen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39, 706716.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau (2013). Language use in the United States 2011: American Community Survey Reports, online: <http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-22.pdf> (last accessed 9 December 2013).+(last+accessed+9+December+2013).>Google Scholar
Vagges, K., Ferrero, F. E., Magno-Caldognetto, E., & Lavagnoli, C. (1978). Some characteristics of Italian consonants. Journal of Italian Linguistics, 3, 6985.Google Scholar
Van Alphen, P., & Smits, R. (2004). Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: the role of prevoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 455491.Google Scholar
Wang, X. (2008). Growing up with three languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Yavaş, M. (2002). VOT patterns in bilingual phonological development. In Windsor, F., Kelly, L., & Hewitt, N. (Eds.), Themes in clinical linguistics (pp. 341350). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar