Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:34:36.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Anne Fernald ,
Traute Taeschner ,
Judy Dunn ,
Mechthild Papousek ,
Bénédicte de Boysson-Bardies  and
Ikuko Fukui
Anne Fernald*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Traute Taeschner
Affiliation:
University of Rome
Judy Dunn
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Mechthild Papousek
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, Munich
Bénédicte de Boysson-Bardies
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris
Ikuko Fukui
Affiliation:
Stanford University
*
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study compares the prosodie modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants in French, Italian, German, Japanese, British English, and American English. At every stage of data collection and analysis, standardized procedures were used to enhance the comparability across data sets that is essential for valid cross-language comparison of the prosodie features of parental speech. In each of the six language groups, five mothers and five fathers were recorded in semi-structured home observations while speaking to their infant aged 0; 10–1;2 and to an adult. Speech samples were instrumentally analysed to measure seven prosodic parameters: mean fundamental frequency (f0), f0-minimum, f0-maximum, f0-range, f0-variability, utterance duration, and pause duration. Results showed cross-language consistency in the patterns of prosodic modification used in parental speech to infants. Across languages, both mothers and fathers used higher mean-f0, f0-minimum, and f0-maximum, greater f0-variability, shorter utterances, and longer pauses in infant-directed speech than in adult-directed speech. Mothers, but not fathers, used a wider f0-range in speech to infants. American English parents showed the most extreme prosodic modifications, differing from the other language groups in the extent of intonational exaggeration in Speech to infants. These results reveal common patterns in caretaker's use of intonation across languages, which may function developmentally to regulate infant arousal and attention, to communicate affect, and to facilitate speech perception and language comprehension. In addition to providing evidence for possibly universal prosodic features of speech to infants, these results suggest that language-specific variations are also important, and that the findings of the numerous studies of early language input based on American English are not necessarily generalisable to other cultures.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , October 1989 , pp. 477 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study is dedicated to Charles A. Ferguson. The research was supported by John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Network on the Transition from Infancy to Early Childhood, and by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (MH 41511) awarded to the first author. For assistance in data collection and analysis, we are especially grateful to Catherine Durand, Elizabeth Kortlander, and Louis Moses.

References

REFERENCES

Blount, B. G. & Padgug, E. J. (1976). Prosodic, paralinguistic, and interactional features in parent-child speech: English and Spanish. Journal of Child Language 4. 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, J. H. & Maxwell, S. E. (1985). Multivariate analysis of variance. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caudill, W. & Weinstein, H. (1969). Maternal care and infant behavior in Japan and America. Psychiatry 2. 12–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, T. G. (1977). Mothers' speech adjustments: the contribution of selected child listener variables. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. E. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1986). Intonation. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Divenyi, P. A. & Hirsh, I. J. (1978). Some figurai properties of auditory patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65. 1369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, P. (1963). Comparing the prosodic features of English, German, Spanish, and French. IRAL 1. 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In Cole, J. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist 66. 103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1978). Talking to children: a search for universals. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of human language. Vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1984 1984). The perceptual and affective salience of mothers' speech to infants. In Feagans, L., Garvey, C. & Golinkoff, R. (eds), The origins and growth of communication. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1985). Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development 8. 181–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. (in press). Intonation and communicative intent: is the melody the message? Child Development.Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Kermanschachi, N. & Lees, D. (1984). The rhythms and sounds of soothing: maternal vestibular, tactile, and auditory stimulation and infant state. Paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. & Kuhl, P. K. (1987). Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech, Infant Behavior and Development 10. 279–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. & Mazzie, C. (1983). Pitch-marking of new and old information in mothers' speech. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Detroit.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. & Simon, T. (1984). Expanded intonation contours in mothers' speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology 20. 104–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, A., Toda, S. & Kawai, M. (1988). Mother-infant face-to-face interaction in Japan and the United States: a laboratory comparison using 3-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology 24. 398–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnica, O. (1977). Some prosodic and paralinguistic features of speech to young children. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R. & Wanner, E. (1982). Language acquisition; the state of the art. In Gleitman, L. R. & Wanner, E. (eds), Language acquisition; the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Glenn, S. M. & Cunningham, C. C. (1983). What do babies listen to most? A developmental study of auditory preferences in non-handicapped infants and infants with Down's Syndrome. Developmental Psychology 19. 332–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M. & Ames, G. J. (1979). A comparison of fathers' and mothers' speech with their young children. Child Development 50. 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieser, D. L. & Kuhl, P. K. (1988). Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: support for universal prosodic features in motherese. Developmental Psychology 24. 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler-Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Wright, K. & Druss, B. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition 26. 269–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hladik, E. G. & Edwards, H. T. (1984). A comparative analysis of mother-father speech in the naturalistic home environment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13. 321–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, J. L., Boersma, D. C., Fields, R. B. & Olson, K. L. (1983). Paralinguistic features of adult speech to infants and small children. Child Development 54. 436–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, J. & Feldstein, S. (1970). Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kelkar, A. (1964). Marathi baby talk. Word 20. 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, S. (1973). The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (1978). Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: a cross-cultural developmental study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17. 539–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magno-Caldognetto, E. & Kori, S. (1983). Intercultural judgment of emotions expressed through voice: the Italians and the Japanese. Paper presented at the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B., White, D., McDevitt, T. & Raskin, R. (1983). Mothers' and fathers' speech to their young children: similar or different? Journal of Child Language 10. 245–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meegaskumbura, P. B. (1980). Tondol: Sinhala baby talk. Word 31. 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehler, J., Bertoncini, J. & Barriere, M. (1978). Infant recognition of mother's voice. Perception 7. 491–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menn, L. & Boyce, S. (1982). Fundamental frequency and discourse structure. Language and Speech 25. 341–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, K., Campos, J. J., Kagan, J. & Bradshaw, D. L. (1986). Issues in socio-emotional development. In Stevenson, H., Azuma, H. & Hakuta, K. (eds), Child development and education in Japan. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. (1986). From simple input to complex grammar. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Morikawa, H., Shand, N. & Kosawa, Y. (1988). Maternal speech to prelingual infants in Japan and the United States: relationships among functions, forms and referents. Journal of Child Language 15. 237–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newport, E. (1976). Motherese: the speech of mothers to young children. In Castellan, N., Pisoni, D., & Potts, G. (eds), Cognitive theory. Vol. 2. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S. G., Brokx, J. P. L. & de Rooji, J. J. (1976). Contributions of prosody to speech perception. IPO Annual Progress Report 5. 34–54.Google Scholar
Papousek, M. & Papousek, H. (in press). Melodic units in maternal speech in tonal and non-tonal languages: evidence of a universal parental support for linguistic communication. Infant Behavior and Development.Google Scholar
Papousek, M., Papousek, H. & Bornstein, M. H. (1985). The naturalistic vocal environment of young infants: on the significance of homogeneity and variability in parental speech. In Field, T. & Fox, N. (eds), Social perception in infants. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Papousek, M., Papousek, H. & Haekel, M. (1987). Didactic adjustments in fathers' and mothers' speech to their three-month-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 6. 49–56.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Ratner, N. B. & Pye, C. (1984). Higher pitch in BT is not universal: acoustic evidence from Quiche Mayan. Journal of Child Language 2. 515–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondal, J. A. (1980). Fathers' and mothers' speech in early language development. Journal of Child Language 7. 353–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruke-Dravina, V. (1976). Gibt es Universalien in der Ammensprache? Salzburger Beiträge zur Linguistik 2. 3–16.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. (1977). The adaptive significance of linguistic input to prelinguistic infants. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin 99. 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (1979). Getting it together: an ethnographic approach to the study of the development of communicative competence. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.), Development Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shimoda, K., Argyle, M. & Riccibitti, P. (1978). The intercultural recognition of emotional expressions by three national racial groups: English, Italian and Japanese. European Journal of Social Psychology 8. 169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shute, B., & Wheldall, K. (1989). Pitch alterations in British motherese: some preliminary acoustic data. Journal of Child Language 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985 a). Introduction: why study acquisition crosslinguistically? In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985 b). Cross-linguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1972). Mothers' speech to children learning language. Child Development 43. 539–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N., Spieker, S., Barnett, R. K. & MacKain, K. (1983). The prosody of maternal speech: infant age and context related changes. Journal of Child Language 10. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, D. N., Spieker, S. & MacKain, K. (1982). Intonation contours as signals in maternal speech to prelinguistic infants. Developmental Psychology 18. 727–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S., Volkmann, J. & Newman, E. B. (1937). A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 8. 185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaissière, J. (1983). Language-independent prosodic features. In Cutler, A. & Ladd, D. R. (eds), Prosody: models and measurements. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Warren-Leubecker, A. & Bohannon, J. N. (1984). Intonation patterns in child-directed speech: mother-father differences. Child Development 55. 1379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingfield, A. (1975). The intonation-syntax interaction: prosodic features in perceptual processing of sentences. In Cohen, A. & Nooteboom, S. G. (eds), Structure and process in speech perception. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Yogman, M. W. (1982). Development of the father-infant relationship. In Fitzgerald, H. E., Lester, B. M. & Yogman, M. W. (eds), Theory and research in behavioral pediatrics. Vol. 2. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar