Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:24:55.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Context-sensitive underspecification and the acquisition of phonemic contrasts*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Daniel A. Dinnsen
Daniel A. Dinnsen*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
*
Department of Linguistics, Indiana University, Memorial Hall 332, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several competing proposals for the (under)specification of phonological representations are evaluated against the facts of phonemic acquisition. Longitudinal evidence relating to the emergence of a voice contrast in the well-documented study of Amahl (from age 2;2 to 3;11) is reconsidered. Neither contrastive specification nor context-free radical underspecification is capable of accounting for the facts. The problem is in the characterization of the change in the status of a feature from being noncontrastive and conditioned by context at one stage to being contrastive with phonetic effects that diffuse gradually through the lexicon. Both frameworks must treat as accidental the persistence of the early substitution pattern and require the postulation of wholesale changes in underlying representations, where these changes do not accord well with the observed phonetic changes or with the facts available to the learner. Context-sensitive radical underspecification provides a plausible account of each stage and the transition between stages with minimal grammar change.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 1996 , pp. 57 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

I am especially grateful to Jessica Barlow for her assistance in carrying out various phases of this research and to Steve Chin, Phil Connell, Stuart Davis, Judith Gierut, David Ingram and Gregory Iverson for their many helpful comments and suggestions. Aspects of this work were first presented in 1993 at SUNY/Buffalo, the University of Washington, and the University of British Columbia. This work was supported in part by grants to Indiana University from the National Institutes of Health, DC00260, DC00076, and DC01694.

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, D. (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, D. (1980). Phonemic perception in children. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. F. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Child phonology: perception. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chen, M. & Wang, W. S.-Y. (1975). Sound change: actuation and implementation. Language 51, 255–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, S. B. & Dinnsen, D. A. (1992). Consonant clusters in disordered speech: constraints and correspondence patterns. Journal of Child Language 19, 259–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinnsen, D. A. (1993). Underspecification and phonological disorders. In Eid, M. & Iverson, G. (eds), Principles and prediction: the analysis of natural language. Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. & Chin, S. B. (1995). On the natural domain of phonological disorders. In Archibald, J. (ed.), Phonological acquisition and phonological theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A., Chin, S. B., Elbert, M. & Powell, T. (1990). Some constraints on functionally disordered phonologies: phonetic inventories and phonotactics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, C. A. (1978). Fricatives in child language acquisition. In Honsa, V. & Hardman-de-Bautista, M. J. (eds), Papers on linguistics and child language: Ruth Hirsch Weir memorial volume. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. (1976). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language 51, 419–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierut, J. A., Cho, M.-H. & Dinnsen, D. A. (1993). Geometric accounts of consonant/vowel interactions in developing systems. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 7, 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. (1992). Early phonological acquisition: a crosslinguistic perspective. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds), Phonological development: models, research, implications. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. (1994). The consequences of optimization for underspecification. Proceedings of the Northeastern Linguistics Society 25.Google Scholar
Keating, P. A. (1988). Underspecification in phonetics. Phonology 5, 275–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1976). Abstractness, opacity, and global rules. In Koutsoudas, A. (ed.), The application and ordering of grammatical rules. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1988). Phonological change. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey, Vol. 1. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1993). Blocking in nonderived environments. In Hargus, S. & Kaisse, E. (eds), Studies in lexical phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kronvall, E. & Diehl, C. (1954). The relationship of auditory discrimination to articulation defects of children with no known organic impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 19, 335–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, A. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: a phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition 38, 245–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). English phonology and phonological theory: synchronic and diachronic studies. Cambridge: C. U. P.Google Scholar
Macken, M. A. (1992). Where's phonology? In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds), Phonological development: models, research, implications. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Macken, M. A. & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: a study of voice onset time in word initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language 7, 41–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menn, L. (1976). Pattern, control and contrast in beginning speech: a case study in the development for word form and word function. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Nittrouer, S. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1987). The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of speech by young children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 30, 319–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, A. S. & Smolensky, P. (in press). Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, M. & Bleile, K. M. (1994). Consonant inventories of young children from 8 to 25 months. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 8, 295–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology: a case study. Cambridge: C. U. P.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. (1986). Towards a theory of phonological development. Lingua 68, 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. (1993). Glottal transparency. Phonology 10, 107–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1991). The underspecification of coronals: evidence from language acquisition and performance errors. In Paradis, C. & Prunet, J.-F. (eds), The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1987). Redundant values. Paper from the 23rd annual regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 339–62.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (1985). Phonetic inventories, 15–24 months: a longitudinal study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28, 505–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language 11, 247–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, A. A. & Edwards, M. L. (1993). Lexical acquisition and acquisition of the initial voicing contrast. Journal of Child Language 20, 253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. A., Figurski, G. R. & Langsdale, T. (1993). Relationships between acoustically determined knowledge of stop place and voicing contrasts and phonological treatment progress. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36, 746–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W. S.-Y. & Crawford, J. (1960). Frequency studies of English consonants. Language and Speech 3, 131–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar