Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:18:02.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contending with foreign accent in early word learning*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

RACHEL SCHMALE ,
GEORGE HOLLICH  and
AMANDA SEIDL
RACHEL SCHMALE*
Affiliation:
North Park University, USA
GEORGE HOLLICH
Affiliation:
Purdue University, USA
AMANDA SEIDL
Affiliation:
Purdue University, USA
*
[*]Address for correspondence: Rachael Schmale, North Park University – Psychology, 3225 W. Foster Ave. Box 16, Chicago, Illinois 60625, United States. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By their second birthday, children are beginning to map meaning to form with relative ease. One challenge for these developing abilities is separating information relevant to word identity (i.e. phonemic information) from irrelevant information (e.g. voice and foreign accent). Nevertheless, little is known about toddlers' abilities to ignore irrelevant phonetic detail when faced with the demanding task of word learning. In an experiment with English-learning toddlers, we examined the impact of foreign accent on word learning. Findings revealed that while toddlers aged 2 ; 6 successfully generalized newly learned words spoken by a Spanish-accented speaker and a native English speaker, success of those aged 2 ; 0 was restricted. Specifically, toddlers aged 2 ; 0 failed to generalize words when trained by the native English speaker and tested by the Spanish-accented speaker. Data suggest that exposure to foreign accent in training may promote generalization of newly learned forms. These findings are considered in the context of developmental changes in early word representations.

Type
Brief Research Reports
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 38 , Issue 5 , November 2011 , pp. 1096 - 1108
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ballem, K. D. & Plunkett, K. (2005). Phonological specificity in children at 1 ; 2. Journal of Child Language 32, 159–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., Gooding, T. N., Orlando, C. B. & Quann, C. A. (2009). Development of phonological constancy: Toddlers' perception of native- and Jamaican-accented words. Psychological Science 20, 539–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagan, J. (1971). Infant recognition memory for a series of visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 11, 244–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. & Pethick, S. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelfer, M. P. (1993). A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females. Phonetica 50, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B. & Logan, J. S. (1991). On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17, 152–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Hallé, P. & de Boysson-Bardies, B. (1994). Emergence of an early lexicon: Infant's recognition of words. Infant Behavior and Development 17, 119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, D. M. (2000). The role of talker variability in infant word representations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Houston, D. M. & Jusczyk, P. W. (2000). The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, 1570–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Jongman, A. & Wade, T. (2007). Acoustic variability and perceptual learning. In Bohn, O. S. and Munro, M. J. (eds), Language experience in second language speech learning, 135–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krentz, U. C. & Corina, D. P. (2008). Preference for language in early infancy: The human language bias is not speech specific. Developmental Science 11, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N. & Lindblom, B. (1992). Language experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255, 606–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S. & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94, 1242–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, N. & Plunkett, K. (2007). Phonological specificity of vowels and consonants in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 57, 252–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition 98, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quam, C. & Swingley, D. (2010). Phonological knowledge guides two-year-olds' and adults' interpretation of salient pitch contours in word learning. Journal of Memory and Language 62, 135–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remez, R. E., Fellowes, J. M. & Rubin, P. E. (1997). Talker identification based on phonetic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23, 651–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Remez, R. E., Van Dyk, J. L., Fellowes, J. M. & Rubin, P. E. (1998). On the perception of qualitative and phonetic similarities of voice. In Kuhl, P. K. & Crum, L. A. (eds), Proceedings of the 16th International Congresss on Acoustics and the 135th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, 2063–64. New York: Acoustical Society of America.Google Scholar
Rost, G. C. & McMurray, B. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science 12, 339–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, A. P. (2004). Production and perceptual correlates of Spanish-accented English. Proceedings of the MIT Conference: From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication, 79–84. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Schmale, R., Cristià, A., Seidl, A. & Johnson, E. K. (2010). Developmental changes in infants' ability to cope with dialect variation in word recognition. Infancy 15(6), 650–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmale, R. & Seidl, A. (2009). Accommodating variability in voice and foreign accent: Flexibility of early word representations. Developmental Science 12, 583–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheffert, S. M., Pisoni, D. B., Fellowes, J. M. & Remez, R. E. (2002). Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28, 1447–69.Google ScholarPubMed
Singh, L. (2008). Influences of high and low variability on infant word recognition. Cognition 106, 833–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, L., Morgan, J. L. & White, K. S. (2004). Preference and processing: The role of speech affect in early spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S. (1979). Perceiving bimodally specified events in infancy. Developmental Psychology 15, 626–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stager, C. L. & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature 388, 381–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Spoken word recognition and lexical representation in very young children. Cognition 76, 147–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Lexical neighborhoods and the word-form representations of 14-month-olds. Psychological Science 13, 480–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swingley, D. & Aslin, R. N. (2007). Lexical competition in young children's word learning. Cognitive Psychology 54, 99–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiessen, E. D. (2007). The effect of distributional information on children's use of phonemic contrasts. Journal of Memory and Language 56, 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F. & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development 1, 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M. & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants' ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy 3, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. S. & Morgan, J. L. (2008). Sub-segmental detail in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 114–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar