Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-6q656 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T04:52:49.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The conceptual impact of linguistic input*

A comparison of German family-children's and orphans' acquisition of kinship terms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Werner Deutsch
Werner Deutsch
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Nijmegen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study was concerned with the question of how linguistic input of the social environment might affect children's acquisition of word meaning. It was argued that the conceptual impact of linguistic input could be demonstrated where the conceptual components underlying word meaning are not primarily based on perceptual categories, as in the case of kinship terms. In two experiments, 84 German children living in families, and 84 orphans, aged from 6 to 10, were compared in their ability to use natural or artificial kinship names as terms for kinship relations. The results suggested that a mere familiarity interpretation for the actual difference in the ability to use kinship terms could be ruled out. Orphans showed a specific conceptual deficit in handling relational components even when the familiarity of the terms was equated for the two groups. Two issues these results raise are whether the orphans' deficit will disappear with increasing age, and to what extent the correct use of kinship terms is due to differences in general intelligence.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 313 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bierwisch, M. (1970). Semantics. In Lyons, J. (ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Harmonds-worth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1976). Semantic factors in the acquisition of word use and sentence construction. In Morehead, D. M. & Morehead, A. E. (eds), Normal and deficient child language. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called? PsycholRev 65. 14–21.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition 2. 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1974). Normal states and evaluative viewpoints 50. 316–32.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1975). Knowledge, context, and strategy in the acquisition of word meaning. In Dato, D. P. (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Danziger, K. (1957). The child's understanding of kinship terms: a study in the development of relational concepts. JGenetPsychol 91. 213–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Elkind, D. (1962). Children's conceptions of brother and sister: Piaget replication study IV. JGenetPsychol 99. 269–76.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1949). The logical analysis of kinship. Philosophy of science 16. 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, S. E. & Clark, E. V. (1974). ‘This man's father is my father's son’: a study of the acquisition of English kin terms. JChLang 1. 23–47.Google Scholar
Heider, E. R. (1972). Universals in color naming and memory. JExpPsychol 93. 10–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, J. (1974). The origins of language comprehension. In Solso, R. L. (ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: the Loyola Symposium. Potomac: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
King, R., Raynes, N. & Tizard, J. (1971). Patterns of residential care: sociological studies in institutions for handicapped children. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. PsycholRev 81. 267–85.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1928). Judgement and reasoning in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Romney, A. K. & D'Andrade, R. G. (1964). Cognitive aspects of English kin terms. AmAuth 66. 146–70.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1977). The role of cognitive development and linguistic input in language acquisition. JChLang 4. 153–69.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Stern, C. & Stern, W. (1907). Die Kindersprache: eine psychologische und sprachtheoretische Untersuchung. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Tizard, B., Cooperman, O., Joseph, A. & Tizard, J. (1972). Environmental effects on language development: a study of young children in long-stay residential nurseries. ChDev 43. 337–58.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. F. C. & Atkins, J. (1960). The meaning of kinship terms. AmAnth 62. 58–72.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1975). Interpersonal communication and the development of language. Paper presented at the Third International Child Language Symposium,London.Google Scholar