Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T18:19:41.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The comprehension of relative clauses in Mandarin Children with suspected specific language impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2021

Haopeng YU ,
Haiyan WANG  and
Xiaowei HE
Haopeng YU*
Affiliation:
Faculty of International Studies, Henan Normal University, China
Haiyan WANG
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages, Xinxiang Medical University, China
Xiaowei HE
Affiliation:
Faculty of English Language and Culture, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, China
*
Corresponding author. Haopeng Yu, Faculty of International Studies, Henan Normal University, Jianshe Road 46#, Xinxiang, Henan, China PR. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the comprehension of Relative Clauses (RCs) in 15 Mandarin children with suspected Specific Language Impairment (SLI) (aged between 4; 5 and 6; 0) and 29 typically developing (TD) controls. Results from a Character Picture Matching Task indicate that (i) the subject RC was better understood than the object RC in children with SLI, but there was no asymmetry in the comprehension of the two RCs in TD children; (ii) the performance of children with SLI was significantly worse than that of their TD peers; (iii) children with SLI were prone to committing thematic role reversal errors and middle errors. In order to overcome the shortcomings of previous accounts, we therefore put forward the Edge Feature Underspecification Hypothesis, which can not only explain the asymmetry of comprehension seen in children with SLI but also shed light on the nature of errors committed by them in the task.

Keywords

relative clausesspecific language impairmentedge feature underspecification hypothesis
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 1 - 26
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. (1990). Syntactic comprehension in children with expressive language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 25(2), 149–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adani, F. (2011). Rethinking the acquisition of Relative Clauses in Italian: Towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 141–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adani, F., Stegenwallner-Schütz, M., Haendler, Y., & Zukowski, A. (2016). Elicited production of Relative Clauses in German: Evidence from typically developing children and children with Specific Language Impairment. First Language, 36(3), 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adani, F., van der Lely, H. K. J., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2010). Grammatical feature dissimilarities make Relative Clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua, 120(9), 2148–2166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnon, I. (2005). Relative clause acquisition in Hebrew: Towards a processing-oriented account. Paper presented at the 29th Boston University Child Language Development Conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Arosio, F., Panzeri, F., Molteni, B., Magazù, S., & Guasti, M. T. (2017). The comprehension of Italian relative clauses in poor readers and in children with Specific Language Impairment. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arosio, F., Yatsushiro, K., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2012). Morphological information and memory resources in children’s processing of relative clauses in German. Language Learning and Development, 8(4), 340–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A. (ed.) (2004). Structures and beyond. the cartography of syntactic structures Vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why only us: language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, J. R., Mac Whinney, B., & Harasaki, Y. (2000). Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development, 71(4), 981–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, H. W. (1984). The comprehension of complex Chinese sentences by children: Relative Clause. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 26(1), 57–66.Google Scholar
Cheng, S. Y-Y. (1995). The Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Chinese (MA thesis).Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In Freidin, R., Otero, C. & Zubzarreta, M. L. (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2016). What kind of creatures are we? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (2002). Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (2020). The syntax of relative clauses: A unified analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, N., Southwood, F., & Van Hout, R. (2012). Specific language impairment as a syntax-phonology (PF) interface problem: evidence from Afrikaans. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, 41:71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Thornton, R., & Murasugi, K. (2009). Capturing the evasive passive. Language Acquisition, 16(2), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromer, R. F. (1978). Hierarchical disability in the syntax of aphasic children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1(4), 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. G., Tager Flusberg, H. B., Hakuta, K., & Cohen, M. (1979). Children's comprehension of Relative Clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8(5), 499–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, N. (2006). Speech production in Broca’s agrammatic aphasia: Syntactic tree pruning. In Grodzinsky, Y. & Amunts, K. (eds.), Broca’s region (pp. 63–82). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N. A., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1997). Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56(3), 397–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of Relative Clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31(3), 661–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2011). Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua, 121, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, N. (2008). Generalized minimality: syntactic underspecification in Broca’s Aphasia (Doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
Grillo, N. (2009). Generalized Minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism. Lingua, 119(10), 1426–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G., & Hansson, K. (2000). Comprehension and production of Relative Clauses: a comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language, 27(2), 313–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamburger, H., & Crain, S. (1982). Relative acquisition. In Kuczaj, S. A. (ed.), Language Development (Vol. 1), ( pp. 245–274). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Hu, S. A., Gavarró, A., Vernice, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2016). The acquisition of Chinese Relative Clauses: contrasting two theoretical approaches. Journal of Child Language, 43(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, S., Costa, F., & Guasti, M. T. (2020). Mandarin–Italian dual-language children’s comprehension of head-final and head-initial relative clauses. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 1379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen de López, K., Olsen, L. S., & Chondrogianni, V. (2014). Annoying Danish relatives: comprehension and production of relative clauses by Danish children with and without SLI. Journal of Child Language, 41(1), 51–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kail, R., & Salthouse, T. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychologica, 86(2), 199–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolk, H. J. (1998). Disorders of syntax in aphasia, linguistic descriptive and processing approaches. In Stemmer, B. & Whitaker, H. (eds.), Handbook of Neurolinguistics (pp. 248–261). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1976). Subject, theme, and the speaker's empathy. A reexamination of Relativization phenomena In Li, C. (ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 417–444). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lee, T. H.-T. (1992). The inadequacy of processing heuristics: Evidence from Relative Clause acquisition in Mandarin Chinese. In Lee, T. H.-T. (ed.), Research in Chinese Linguistics in Hong Kong (pp. 47–85). Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (2014). Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, X. L., de Villiers, J., Ning, C., Rolfhus, E., Hutchings, T., Lee, W., Jiang, F., & Zhang, Y. W. (2017). Research to Establish the Validity, Reliability, and Clinical Utility of a Comprehensive Language Assessment of Mandarin. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 60(3), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0334 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenzo, G., & Vares, E. (2017). The externalization component as the locus of specific impairments. Biolinguistics, 11, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, G., & Vares, E. (2019). The Distinctness Condition in SLI: More on the Specific Externalization impairment. Glosema: Revista Asturiana de Llingüística, 1, 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, D., McKee, C., & Cairns, H. S. (1998). Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ning, C. Y., Liu, X. M. L., & de Villiers, J. (2014). The diagnostic receptive and expressive assessment of Mandarin. Dallas, TX: Bethel Hearing and Speaking Training Center.Google Scholar
O’Brien, K., Grolla, E., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Long passives are understood by young children. In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T. & Saller, C. (eds.). Proceedings from the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 441–451.Google Scholar
Piñango, M. M. (1999). Syntactic displacement in Broca’s aphasia comprehension. In: Grodzinsky, Y., Bastiaanse, R. (eds.), Grammatical Disorders in Aphasia: A Neurolinguistic Perspective (pp. 75–87). London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Pinto, M., & Zuckerman, S. (2018). Coloring book: a new method for testing language comprehension. Behavior Research Methods 51(6), 1–20.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20 (3): 365–424.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Richards, N. (2010). Uttering Trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2004). Locality and left periphery. In Belletti, A. (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (pp. 223–251). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2006). On the form of Chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Cheng, L. and Corver, N. (eds.) Wh-movement: Moving on, (pp. 97–134). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sang, B., & Miao, X. C. (1990). Pibodi tupian cihui ceyan xiudingban (PPVT-R) Shanghai shiyongqu changmo de xiuding (The rivision of trail norm of Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test revised (PPVT-R) in Shanghai proper). Xinli Kexue (Information on Psychological Sciences ) 5, 22–27.Google Scholar
Schuele, M. C., & Dykes, J. C. (2005). Complex syntax acquisition: a longitudinal case study of a child with specific language impairment. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 19(4), 295–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200410001703709 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shetreet, E., & Novogrodsky, R. (2019). Differential patterns of children’s knowledge of quantifier meaning revealed under different tasks. Frontiers in Communication, 4 : 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism , 1(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S. (2001). Comprehension of reversible Relative Clauses in Specifically Language Impaired and normally developing Greek children, Brain & Language, 77(3), 419–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, Y.-C. (2006). Word order effect in children’s garden path of relative clauses. Concentric 32(2), 33–57.Google Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J. (1996). Specifically Language Impaired and normally developing children: Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation. Lingua, 98(4), 243–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J., & Battell, J. (2003). Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis. Language, 79(1), 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J., & Harris, M. (1990). Comprehension of reversible sentences in Specifically Language-Impaired. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55(1), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed