Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:36:11.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competence and performance in child language: are children really competent to judge?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Jill G. De Villiers  and
Peter A. De Villiers
Jill G. De Villiers
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University
Peter A. De Villiers
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The notion of competence as it applies to child language is critically assessed in the light of evidence collected from a number of linguistic performances which share the same word-order rule. These performances – production, comprehension, judgment and correction – parallel Moravcsik's (1969) formulation of Chomsky's criteria for tacit knowledge of a rule, i.e. competence. It was found that these criteria are not all satisfied until the child is four or five years old, as the performances appear at very different points in time. Alternative criteria for tacit knowledge are suggested, with specific models of each performance replacing a general model of competence for early child speech.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , May 1974 , pp. 11 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G., Mehler, J. H. & Valian, V. V. (in press). Linguistic capacity of very young children. In Bever, T. G. & Weksel, W. (eds), The acquisition of structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. F. (1970). Learning to talk: a cross-linguistic study of early syntactic development, with special reference to Finnish. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. (Published as Early syntactic development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. London: C.U.P., 1973.)Google Scholar
Braine, M. (1970). The acquisition of language in infant and child. In Reed, C. (ed.), The learning of language: essays in honor of David Russell. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Brown, R. W. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. W., Cazden, C. & Bellugi, U. (1968). The child's grammar from I to III. In Hill, J. P. (ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. W., Fraser, C. & Bellugi, U. (1964). Explorations in grammar evaluation. In Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. W. (eds), The acquisition of language. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Devel. 29.Google ScholarPubMed
Burling, R. (1959). Language development of a Garo and English-speaking child. Word 15. 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. ChD 39. 433–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. A. (1964). Discussion of paper by Miller & Ervin. In Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. W. (eds), The acquisition of language. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Devel. 29.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
de Villiers, P. A. & de Villiers, J. G. (1972). Early judgments of semantic and syntactic acceptability by children. JPsychRes 1. 299–310.Google ScholarPubMed
de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. JPsychRes 2. 267–78.Google ScholarPubMed
de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A. (in press). Development of the use of word order in comprehension. JPsychResGoogle Scholar
Ervin, S. (1964). Imitation and structural change in children's language. In Lennenberg, E. H. (ed.), New directions in the study of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1968). The appeal to tacit knowledge in psychological explanation. JPhilos 65. 627–40.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1972). Some reflections on L. S. Vygotsky's Thought and Language. Cognition 1. 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. W. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production. JVLVB 2. 122–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H. & Shipley, E. F. (1972). The emergence of the child as grammarian. Cognition 1. 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandy, R. E. (1973). Grammatical knowledge and states of mind. Behaviorism 1. 16–23.Google Scholar
Lovell, K. & Dixon, E. M. (1965). The growth and control of grammars in imitation, comprehension and production. JChPsycholPyschiat. 5. 1–9.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language. New York and London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1969). Sentences children use. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Miller, W. & Ervin, S. (1964). The development of grammar in child language. In Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. W. (eds), The acquisition of language. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Devel. 29.Google ScholarPubMed
Moravcsik, J. M. E. (1969). Competence, creativity and innateness. Philosophical Forum 1. 407–37.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1971). Production of utterance and language acquisition. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar: a theoretical symposium. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar