Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:07:00.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clahsen H., Spracherwerbinder Kindheit – eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern. Tübingen: Narr, 1982. Pp. 183. Dokumentation von Daten zur frühen Kindersprache. Wuppertaler Arbeitspapiere zur Sprachwissenschaft, 4, 1982. Pp. 217.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Anne E. Mills
Affiliation:
Seminar für englische Philologie, University of Tübingen, 74 Tübingen, F.R.G.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, C. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Cazden, C. & Bellugi, U. (1969). The child's grammar from I to III. In Hill, J. (ed.), Minnesota Symposia on child psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J. & Pienemann, M. (1983). Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Täbingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). Getting developmental differences or studying child development? Cognition 10. 151–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labov, W. & Labov, T. (1978). Learning the syntax of questions. In Campbell, R. N. & Smith, P. T. (eds), Recent advances in the psychology of language: language development and mother-child interaction. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Levelt, V. J. M., Mills, A. E. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). Child language research in ESF countries. An inventory. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. V. M. (1980). Different routes to multiple-word combinations. Proceedings of the 1980 Child Language Research Forum. Stanford.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. V. M. (1984). Individual differences. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), Cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3. 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A. E. (1984). The acquisition of German. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), Cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monogr.Soc.Res.Ch.Devel. 38.Google Scholar
Park, T.-Z. (1979). Some facts on negation: Wode's four-stage developmental theory of negation revisited. JChLang 6. 147–51.Google Scholar
Ramer, A. (1976). Syntactic styles in emerging language. JChLang 3. 4962.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1977). Language change in childhood and in history. In Macnamara, J. (ed.), Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1984). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Weiss, P. A. (1971). Within the gates of science and beyond. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Wode, H. (1977). Four early stages in the development of LI negation. JChLang 6. 87102.Google Scholar