Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:53:57.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's ambiguous utterances: a re-examination of processing limitations on production*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Luca Surian
Luca Surian*
Affiliation:
M.R.C. Cognitive Development Unit, London
*
Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sriluppo, Università di Padova, Via Bento Pellegrino 26, 35137 Padova, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability to convey the optimal amount of information during conversation is a fundamental aspect of language use. In this study the relationship between children's failures to produce unambiguous utterances and the mental effort demands of the communication task was investigated. Five-, six-, seven- and nine-year-old children performed a message production task and a finger-tapping task both separately and simultaneously. The decrease in finger-tapping frequency during the simultaneous performance was used as an estimate of effort demands of the message production task. Working memory capacity was assessed by means of a spatial memory test and an object features identification task. Children's intuitions about message adequacy were recorded in two message evaluation tasks. By age six children proved to be able to select the relevant information when they were explicitly asked to do so, indicating that effort demands of the communication task did not exceed their computational resources. However, results suggested that the relative effort requirements of the communication task decrease with increasing age. These findings support a performance theory of communication development in which effort demands are a determinant of children's message adequacy.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 151 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

I wish to thank Beatrice Benelli, Rob Guttentag, Remo Job, Gary Lange, Marc Marschark and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. Geoff Hall, Annette Karmiloff-Smith and John Morton are also thanked for close reading and suggestions on an earlier draft. Thanks also go to Julia Grant and Ann Whittaker for their advice and to Elsa Miozzo, the teachers, and the students of the Piazzola sul Brenta (Padua, Italy) elementary school for their kind collaboration.

References

REFERENCES

Asher, S. R. (1979). Referential communication. In Whitehurst, G. J. & Zimmerman, B. (eds), The functions of language and cognition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Beal, C. R. & Belgrad, S. L. (1990). The development of message evaluation skills in young children. Child Development 61, 705–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beal, C. R. & Flavell, J. H. (1984). Development of the ability to distinguish communicative intention and literal meaning. Child Development 55, 920–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. & Adams, C. (1991). What do referential communication tasks measure? A study of children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 12, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorklund, D. F. & Harnishfeger, K. K. (1987). Developmental differences in the mental effort requirements for the use of an organizational strategy in free recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 44, 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brainerd, C. J. & Reyna, V. F. (1989). Output-interference theory of dual-task deficits in memory development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 47, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14, 597–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, W. & Pechmann, T. (1982). Social interaction and the development of definite descriptions. Cognition 11, 159–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flavell, J. H., Speer, J. R., Green, F. L. & August, D. L. (1981). The development of comprehension monitoring and knowledge about communication. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 46 (Serial No. 192).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1992). A theory of the child's theory of mind. Cognition 44, 283–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds), Syntax and semantics. New York: Academic Pres.Google Scholar
Guttentag, R. E. (1984). The mental effort requirement of cumulative rehearsal: a developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 37, 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttentag, R. E. (1989). Age differences in dual-tasks performance: procedures, assumptions, and results. Developmental Review 9, 146–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory in comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99, 122–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. (1991). Strategies to communicate route directions by telephone: a comparison of the performance of 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds and adults. Journal of Child Language 18, 175–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, P. & Beveridge, M. (1981). Information and meaning in child communication. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P., Boada, H. & Forns, M. (1992). New directions in referential communication research. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 10, 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, P. & Russell, J. (1989). Young children's understanding of the say—mean distinction in referential speech. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 47, 467–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navon, D. (1984). Resources – a theoretical soapstone? Psychological Review 91, 216–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1923). Le langage et la pensée chez l'enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Pynte, J., Girotto, V. & Baccino, T. (1991). Children's communicative abilities revisited: verbal versus perceptual disambiguating strategies in referential communication. Journal of Child Language 18, 191–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, C. J. & Patterson, C. J. (1983). Perspective taking and referential communication: the question of correspondence reconsidered. Child Development 54, 1005–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, E. J. (1981). The child's understanding of inadequate messages: a problem of ignorance or egocentrism? In Dickson, W. P. (ed.), Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. J. & Robinson, W. P. (1978). The roles of egocentrism and weakness in comparing children's explanations of communicative failure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 26, 147–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, E. J. & Whittaker, S. J. (1986). Children's conceptions of meaning–message relationships. Cognition 22, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sodian, B. (1990). Understanding verbal communication: children's ability to deliberately manipulate ambiguity in referential messages. Cognitive Development 5, 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1987). Précis of Relevante: communication and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10, 697–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surian, L. (1991). Do children exploit the Maxim of Antecedent in order to interpret ambiguous descriptions? Journal of Child Language 18, 451–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surian, L. & Job, R. (1987). Children's use of conversational rules in a referential communication task. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 4, 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J. (1976). The development of communication: changes with age and modelling. Child Development 47, 473–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J. & Sonnenschein, S. (1985). The development of communication: a functional analysis. Annals of Child Development 2, 1–48.Google Scholar