Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:05:35.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in the explicitness of mothers' directives as children age*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

David Bellinger
Affiliation:
Cornell University

Abstract

This study investigates the surface forms which mothers use to direct their children's behaviour. It is generally supposed that social factors control a speaker's choice of directive form. However, it is shown that mothers' use of the various forms may be related to a cognitive variable, viz. the degree to which the forms possess the surface properties and, hence, clarity of canonical imperatives. As children get older, mothers' directives lose, in a meaningful order, properties which help to specify their mood and content. It is suggested that the social properties of the context do eventually replace the cognitive demands of the various forms as the primary influence on mother's choices.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This paper is based on portions of a dissertation submitted to Cornell University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. The research was supported by Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant SOC75–O7152 from the National Science Foundation to the author and by Training Grant MH-08520-12 awarded to Cornell University by the National Institute of Mental Health. This paper was prepared while the author was at the Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York, during which time support was provided by Public Health Service Postdoctoral Fellowship 1-F32-MH07094-01 awarded by the National Institute of Mental Health. Portions of the paper were presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, March 1977. Thanks go to Dr Alfred L. Baldwin, the chairman of my graduate committee, for his guidance and support throughout my graduate study and to Dr Julia Matthews Bellinger for many helpful comments on the manuscript. Address for correspondence: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Enders, M41, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, U.S.A.

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, B. (1978). Children's understanding of speech acts in unconventional directive frames. ChDev 49. 311–18.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bellinger, D. (1977). The structure of maternal speech acts. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? the structure of some American English directives. Lang Soc 5. 2566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. & Miller, W. (1977). Early discourse: some questions about questions. In Lewis, M. & Rosenblum, L. (eds), Interaction, conversation and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1975). Requests and responses in children's speech. JChLang 2. 4163.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. & Lakoff, G. (1971). Conversational postulates. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Linguistics Department, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds), Syntax and semantics. Vol. III. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1977). How to do things by asking: form–function relations in mothers' questions. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development,New Orleans.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1978). On the development of communicative understandings: an early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages. CogPsych 10. 271301.Google Scholar
Watson, L. & Donahue, M. (1976). How to get some action. Paper presented at the first annual Boston University Conference on Language Development,Boston.Google Scholar