Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:33:23.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can non-interactive language input benefit young second-language learners?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2014

TERRY KIT-FONG AU ,
WINNIE WAILAN CHAN ,
LIAO CHENG ,
LINDA S. SIEGEL  and
RICKY VAN YIP TSO
TERRY KIT-FONG AU*
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
WINNIE WAILAN CHAN
Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Institute of Education
LIAO CHENG
Affiliation:
Harvard University
LINDA S. SIEGEL
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
RICKY VAN YIP TSO
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
*
Address for correspondence: Terry Kit-fong Au, Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Centennial Campus, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China. tel: (852) 3917 2383; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To fully acquire a language, especially its phonology, children need linguistic input from native speakers early on. When interaction with native speakers is not always possible – e.g. for children learning a second language that is not the societal language – audios are commonly used as an affordable substitute. But does such non-interactive input work? Two experiments evaluated the usefulness of audio storybooks in acquiring a more native-like second-language accent. Young children, first- and second-graders in Hong Kong whose native language was Cantonese Chinese, were given take-home listening assignments in a second language, either English or Putonghua Chinese. Accent ratings of the children's story reading revealed measurable benefits of non-interactive input from native speakers. The benefits were far more robust for Putonghua than English. Implications for second-language accent acquisition are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 323 - 350
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We thank the children, parents, and staff of Laichikok Catholic Primary School in Hong Kong for their support of this research. This work was supported by a grant (HKU7400/06H) from the Research Grants Council, Hong Kong SAR (China). We are grateful to a team of dedicated research assistants for data collection, coding, and analysis, to Kathy Shum and Sing-hang Cheung for helping with data analysis, and to Karen Ravn for commenting on earlier drafts.

References

REFERENCES

Akhtar, N. (2005). The robustness of learning through overhearing. Developmental Science 8, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, D. R. & Hanson, K. G. (2010). From blooming, buzzing confusion to media literacy: the early development of television viewing. Developmental Review 30, 239–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, T. K. (2013). Songs as ambient language input in phonology acquisition. Language Learning and Development 9, 266–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, T. K., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A. & Oh, J. S. (2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science 13, 238–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, T. K., Oh, J. S., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A. & Romo, L. F. (2008). Salvaging a childhood language. Journal of Memory & Language 58, 998–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (eds), Joint attention: its origins and role in development, 131–58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: a perceptual assimilation model. In Goodman, J. C. & Nusbaum, H. C. (eds), The development of speech perception: the transition from speech sounds to spoken words, 167–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. & Hakuta, K. (1994). In other words: the science and psychology of second-language acquisition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. & Hakuta, K. (1999). Confounded age: linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In Birdsong, D. (ed.), Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 161–181. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language 68, 706–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisitions. Journal of Memory & Language 44, 235–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B. & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 447–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, J. S., Mattys, S. L. & Gage, S. H. (2009). Preserved implicit knowledge of a forgotten childhood language. Psychological Science 20, 1064–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B. & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 977–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A. Y. W. (2010). An investigation into Cantonese ESL learners’ acquisition of English initial consonant clusters. Linguistics 48, 99–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiswick, B. R. & Miller, P. W. (2004). Linguistic distance: a quantitative measure of the distance between English and other languages. IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 1246, online: <http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20510>..>Google Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B. (2012). Ordinal – Regression Models for Ordinal Data R package version 2012.09-11, online: <http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/>..>Google Scholar
Csibra, G. (2010). Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind & Language 25, 141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: a psycholinguistic study of a modern-day ‘wild child’. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
De Boysson-Bardies, B. (1993). Ontogeny of language-specific syllabic productions. In de Boysson-Bardies, B., de Schonen, S., Jusczyk, P., McNeilage, P. & Morton, J. (eds), Developmental neurocognition: speech and face processing in the first year of life, 353–63. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene-Lambertz, G. & Houston, D. (1998). Faster orientation latencies toward native language in two-month-old infants. Language & Speech 41, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology, trans. Ruger, H. A. & Bussenius, C. E.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P. & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science 171, 303–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 209–35. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is the melody the message? Child Development 60, 1497–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H. & Tsukada, K. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics 34, 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Wang, C. (1989). Native-language phonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final English /t/–/d/ contrast. Journal of Phonetics 17, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H. & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory & Language 41, 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, R. L. (2008). Repetition and spacing effects. In Roediger, H. L. III (ed.), Learning and memory: a comprehensive reference. Vol. 2: cognitive psychology of memory, 65–78. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W.-O., Lee, S.-H., Tsang, S.-M. & Luan, V. H. (2004). Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition 91, 43–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyltenstam, K., Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N. & Park, H.-S. (2009). Dominant-language replacement: the case of international adoptees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., Oh, J. S. & Au, T. K. (2003). Production benefits of childhood overhearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114, 465–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K. (2010). Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron 67, 713–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K. & Meltzoff, A. N. (1982). The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. Science 218, 1138–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K. & Meltzoff, A. N. (1996). Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 2425–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M. & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 100, 9096–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mair, V. H. (1991). What is a Chinese ‘dialect/topolet’? Reflections on some key Sino-English linguistic terms. Sino-Platonic Papers 29, online: <http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp029_chinese_dialect.html>.Google Scholar
Mayberry, R. I. (1993). First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second language acquisition: the case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 36, 1258–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maye, J., Werker, J. F. & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 82, B101–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehler, J. & Christophe, A. (1995). Maturation and learning of language in the first year of life. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.), The cognitive neurosciences: a handbook for the field, 943–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mezzacappa, E. (2004). Alerting, orienting, and executive attention: developmental properties and sociodemographic correlates in an epidemiological sample of young, urban children. Child Development 75, 1373–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. & Ayduk, O. (2002). Self-regulation in a cognitive-affective personality system: attentional control in the service of the self. Self and Identity 1, 113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, J. S., Au, T. K. & Jun, S.-A. (2010). Early childhood language memory in the speech of perception of international adoptees. Journal of Child Language 37, 1123–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oh, J. S., Jun, S.-A., Knightly, L. M. & Au, T. K. (2003). Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition 86, B53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshima-Takane, Y. (1988). Children learn from speech not addressed to them: the case of personal pronouns. Journal of Child Language 15, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5, 261–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, online: <http://www.R-project.org/>..>Google Scholar
Ramsey, S. R. (1987). The languages of China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rvachew, S. (1994). Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 37, 347–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachs, J., Bard, B. & Johnson, M. L. (1981). Language learning with restricted input: case studies of two hearing children of deaf parents. Applied Psycholinguistics 2, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, L., Liederman, J., Mierzejewski, R. & Barnes, J. (2011). Rapid reacquisition of native phoneme contrasts after disuse: you do not always lose what you do not use. Developmental Science 14, 949–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C., Arlman-Rupp, A., Hassing, Y., Jobse, J., Joosten, J. & Vorster, J. (1976). Mothers’ speech in three social classes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, C. K. & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language & Speech 53, 273–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
So, L. K. H. & Dodd, B. J. (1995). The acquisition of phonology by Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 22, 473–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tees, R. C. & Werker, J. F. (1984). Perceptual flexibility: maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology 38, 579–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development 57, 1454–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, P. & Aitchison, J. (1980). Learning language the hard way. First Language 1, 122–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F. & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development 7, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F. & Tees, R. C. (2005). Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology 46, 233–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, L. & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research 12, 233–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test–Revision 3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Association.Google Scholar