Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:05:24.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The association between comprehension of spoken sentences and early reading ability: the role of phonetic representation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Virginia A. Mann ,
Donald Shankweiler  and
Suzanne T. Smith
Virginia A. Mann
Affiliation:
Haskins Laboratories and Bryn Mawr College
Donald Shankweiler
Affiliation:
Haskins Laboratories and University of Connecticut
Suzanne T. Smith
Affiliation:
Haskins Laboratories and University of Connecticut
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When repeating spoken sentences, children who are good readers tend to be more accurate than poor readers because they are able to make more effective use of phonetic representation in the service of working memory (Mann, Liberman & Shankweiler 1980). This study of good and poor readers in the third grade has assessed both the repetition and comprehension of relative-clause sentences to explore more fully the association between early reading ability, spoken sentence processing and use of phonetic representation. It was found that the poor readers did less well than the good readers on sentence comprehension as well as on sentence repetition, and that their comprehension errors reflected a greater reliance on two sentence-processing strategies favoured by young children: the minimum-distance principle and conjoined-clause analysis. In general, the pattern of results is consonant with a view that difficulties with phonetic representation could underlie the inferior sentence comprehension of poor beginning readers. The finding that these children place greater reliance on immature processing strategies raises the further possibility that the tempo of their syntactic development may be slower than that of good readers.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , October 1984 , pp. 627 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blumstein, S., Goodglass, H., Statlender, S. & Biber, C. (1983). Comprehension strategies determining reference in aphasia: a study of reflexivization. Br & Lang 18. 115–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, S., Shankweiler, D. & Mann, V. A. (1983). Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. JExpChPsychol 35. 345–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Brown, H. D. (1971). Children's comprehension of relativized English sentences. ChDev 42. 1923–6.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. (1981 a). Deficient syntactic control in poor readers: is a weak phonetic memory code responsible? AppPsycholing 2. 201–12.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. (1981 b). Reading disability, linguistic access and short-term memory: comments prompted by Jorm's review of developmental dyslexia. AustJPsychol 33. 83–95.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. & Shea, P. (1979). Semantic and phonetic memory codes in beginning readers. Mem & Cog 7. 333–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax in children from five to ten. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
De Renzi, E. & Faglioni, P. (1978). Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token Test. Cortex 14. 41–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Renzi, E. & Vignolo, L. A. (1962). The token test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasia. Brain 85. 665–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. G., Tager-Flusberg, H. B., Hakuta, K. & Cohen, M. (1979). Children's comprehension of relative clauses. JPsycholingRes 8. 499–518.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M. (1965). Peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines, Minn. American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Hieronymus, A. N. & Lindquist, E. F. (1978). Iowa test of basic skills. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Katz, R. B. (1982). Phonological deficiencies in children with reading disability: evidence from an object-naming task. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Katz, R. B., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (1981). Memory for item order and phonetic recoding in the beginning reader. JExpChPsychol 33. 474–84.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. G. & Turvey, M. T. (1972). Language codes and memory codes. In Melton, A. W. & Martin, E. (eds), Coding processes and human memory. Washington, D.C.: Winston.Google Scholar
Liberman, I., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Orthography and the beginning reader. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Venezky, R. L. (eds), Orthography, reading, and dyslexia. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Mann, V. A., Shankweiler, D. & Werfelman, M. (1982). Children's memory for recurring linguistic and non-linguistic material in relation to reading ability. Cortex 18. 367–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C. & Fischer, F. W. (1977). Phonetic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reader. In Reber, A. S. & Scarborough, D. L. (eds), Toward a psychology of reading: the proceedings of the CUNY Conferences. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mann, V. A. & Liberman, I. Y. (in press).: Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory: can they presage early reading problems?. JLearnDis.Google Scholar
Mann, V. A., Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Children's memory for sentences and word strings in relation to reading ability. Mem & Cog 8. 329–35.Google Scholar
Orgass, B. & Poeck, K. (1966). Clinical validation of a new test of aphasia: an experimental study on the token test. Cortex 2. 222–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. & Goldman, S. (1976). Discourse memory and reading comprehension skill. JVLVB 14. 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeck, K., Orgass, B., Kerschensteiner, M. & Hartje, W. (1974). A qualitative study of token test performance in aphasic and non-aphasic brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 49–54.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. S. (1967). The grammar of English predicate constructions. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Satz, P., Taylor, H. G., Friel, J. & Fletcher, J. (1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disabilities: a six year follow-up. In Benton, A. L. & Pearl, D. (eds), Dyslexia: an appraisal of current knowledge. New York.: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Mark, L. M., Fowler, C. A. & Fischer, F. W. (1979). The speech code and learning to read. JExpPsychol: HumLearnMem 5. 531–45.Google Scholar
Shankweiler, D., Smith, S. T. & Mann, V. A. (in press). Repetition and comprehension of spoken sentences by reading-disabled children. Br & Lg.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. JVLVB 13. 272–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. (1974). Relative clause formation between 29–36 months: a preliminary report. PRCLD 8. 104–10.Google Scholar
Tavakolian, S. L. (1981). The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. In Tavakolian, S. L. (ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Weinstein, R. & Rabinovitch, M. S. (1971). Sentence structure and retention in good and poor readers. JEducPsychol 62. 25–30.Google Scholar
Wiig, E. H, & Roach, M. A. (1975). Immediate recall of semantically varied sentences by learning disabled readers. PerceptMotSkills 40. 119–25.Google Scholar