Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:20:33.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arguments against Hurford's ‘Aux Copying Rule’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Stan A. Kuczaj II
Affiliation:
Southern Methodist University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Cazden, C. & Bellugi, U. (1969). The child's grammar from I to III. In Hill, J. P. (ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology Vol. II. Minneapolis; University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. (1975). A child and the English question formation rule. JChLang 2. 299301.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Lg 45. 715–62.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1963). Syntactic structures in the language of children. ChDev 34. 407–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Menyuk, P. (1969). Sentences children use. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1971). The acquisition and development of language. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Miller, W. & Ervin, S. (1964). The development of grammar in child language. In Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (eds), The acquisition of language. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 29, 934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, C. (1974). Predication: a study of its development. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar