Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:57:50.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An experimental investigation of adult perception of one-word utterances*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Rachel L. Olney  and
Ellin Kofsky Scholnick
Rachel L. Olney
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Ellin Kofsky Scholnick
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to examine the extent to which adult judgments of first words depend on visual and auditory cues, spontaneous utterances were collected for boys and girls of 1; 5, 1; 6 and 1; 10 as well as adults naming the same toys. Vocalizations clearly appropriate to the original visual context were dubbed onto new contexts varying in the number of phonetic features (0-2) by which the first phoneme of the utterance differed from the initial phoneme labelling the visual context. College students' perceptual accuracy declined with degree of mismatch, although the identical speech occurred in each context. The older the speaker, the less perception was affected by visual context. Whereas the meaning of child speech was judged by visual cues, adult meanings were judged mostly by auditory input. Biases in perceiving early speech may prompt reconsideration of current methodology and theory in early language acquisition.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 131 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This report is derived from a dissertation submitted by the first author in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Maryland. The research was supervised by the second author. Both authors would like to thank the dissertation committee: Professors Nancy Anderson, William O. Dingwall, David L. Horton, Janet W. Johnson and James G. Martin for their advice and Dr Carol B. Mills and Robert Phillips for their assistance in data analyses. The research was supported in part through grants from the Biomedical Science Support Committee and the Computer Science Center to the Center for Language and Cognition at the University of Maryland. Address for Correspondence: Dr Rachel L. Olney, Department of Psychology, Bates College, Lewiston, Maine 04240.

References

REFERENCES

Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: the use of single word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lightbown, P. & Hood, L. (1975). Structure and variation in child language. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 40, No. 2.Google Scholar
Jones, N. Blurton (1972). Characteristics of ethological studies of human behaviour. In Jones, N. Blurton (ed.), Ethological studies of child behaviour. London: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S. (1976). Language development (2nd edn). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Dore, J., Franklin, M. B., Miller, R. T. & Ramer, A. L. H. (1976). Transitional phenomena in early language acquisition. JChLang 3. 13–28.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Lg 51. 419–39.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. (1973). Who is ‘dada’? Some aspects of the semantic and phonological development of first words. Lg&Sp 16. 34–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewis, M. M. (1951). Infant speech. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 38, Nos. 1–2.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. PsychRev 81. 267–85.Google Scholar
Oiler, D. K., Wieman, L. A., Doyle, W. J. & Ross, C. (1976). Infant babbling and speech. JChLang 3. 1–11.Google Scholar
Staats, A. W. & Staats, C. K. (1966). Complex human behavior. New York: Holt, Rineharst & Winston.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. F. (1960). Observational child study. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Handbook of research methods in child development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar