Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:17:05.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquiring case-marked pronouns in Hebrew: the interaction of linguistic factors*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Anita Rom  and
Revital Dgani
Anita Rom
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
Revital Dgani
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children's production of case-marked pronouns in Hebrew was studied with respect to possessive marking, direct-object marking, and ‘on’- locative marking. In each of these three instances the preposition appears in a bound form with a suffixal pronominal. One hundred and five children between 2;0 and 5:5 were tested in a game-like procedure designed to elicit each of the three prepositions with 1st, 2nd and 3rd personal pronouns. Results indicate that general cross-linguistic principles are operating in the acquisition process, while language specific morphophonological complexity affects relative order of acquisition. A developmental sequence may be seen in the five response patterns identified.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 61 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berman, R. A. (1981 a). Regularity vs anomaly: the acquisition of Hebrew inflectional morphology. JChLang 8. 265–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Berman, R. A. (1981 b). Language development and language knowledge: evidence from the acquisition of Hebrew morphophonology. JChLang 8. 609–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Berman, R. A. (in press). Acquisition of Hebrew. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), Cross linguistic study of child language. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and language disorders. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, R. (1980). Speech roles and the development of personal pronouns. JChLang 7. 509–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Chiat, S. (1981). Context specificity and generalization in the acquisition of pronominal distinctions. JChLang 8. 75–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Chiat, S. (1982). If I were you, and you were me: the analysis of pronouns in a pronoun-reversing child. JChLang 9. 359–79.Google Scholar
Clark, E. & Sengul, C. J. (1978). Strategies in the acquisition of deixis. JChLang 5. 457–72.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1977). The acquisition of personal pronouns and language ‘simplification’. L & S 20. 146–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Deutch, W. & Pechmann, T. (1978). Ihr, dir or mir? On the acquisition of pronouns in German children. Cognition 6. 155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, J. G. & De Villiers, P. A. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the development of grammatical morphemes in child speech. JPsycholingRes 2. 267–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Dromi, E. (1979). More on the acquisition of locative prepositions: an analysis of Hebrew data. JChLang 6. 547–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Dromi, E. & Berman, R. (1982). A morphemic measure of early language development: data from modern Hebrew. JChLang 9. 403–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Huxley, R. (1970). The development of the correct use of subject personal pronouns in two children. In Flores d'Arcais, G. B. & Levelt, W. J. M. (eds), Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. R. & Slobin, D. I. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. JChLang 6. 529–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, D. (1983). Developmental trends in the grammar of 2–3 year old children. Unpublished MA thesis, Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
Lipp, E. (1977). The acquisition of Estonian inflections. JChLang 4. 531–47.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1976). Hungarian research on the acquisition of morphology and syntax. JChLang 3. 397–410.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 43, No. 174.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. (1979). Learning how and when to use pronouns and determiners. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition: studies in first language development. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Tanz, C. (1974). Cognitive principles underlying children's errors in pronominal case marking. JChLang 1. 271–6.Google Scholar
Tanz, C. (1980). Studies in the acquisition of deictic terms. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Waryas, C. L. (1973). Psycholinguistic research in language intervention programming: the pronoun system. JPsycholingRes 2. 221–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Waterman, P. & Shatz, M. (1982). The acquisition of personal pronouns and proper names by an identical twin pair. JSHR 25. 149–54.Google ScholarPubMed