Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T22:33:04.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accelerating language learning in young children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Froma P. Roth
Froma P. Roth
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To examine the effects of direct intervention on language learning, 18 children ranging in age from 3;6 to 4;6 were systematically taught linguistic structures still beyond their developmental grasp. Four types of relative clause sentences were trained, using a toy manipulation task. Solid improvement was found in the performance of subjects in the two experimental conditions between the Pre- and Post-test Phases. No significant improvement was demonstrated by the control condition subjects. This successful outcome is viewed as demonstrating that the language learning process is somewhat independent of cognitive development. In addition, error response analyses indicated that the First Noun strategy accounted for the majority of errors, providing support for the canonical–sentoid hypothesis.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 89 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amidon, A. & Carey, P. (1972). Why five-year olds cannot understand ‘before’ and ‘after’. JVLVB 11. 417–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, E. & Harms, R. (1968). Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Baird, R. (1974). Recall of embedded sentences: perceptual or performance deficit? Bull-PsychonomSoc 3. 36–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, R. & Koslick, J. D. (1974). Recall of grammatical relations with clause-containing sentences. JPsycholingRes 3. 165–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. MPQ 21. 205–26.Google Scholar
Beilin, H. (1964). Perceptual-cognitive conflict in the development of an invariant area concept. JExpChPsych 1. 208–26.Google Scholar
Beilin, H. & Kagan, J. (1969). Pluralization rules and the conceptualization of number. DevPsychol 1. 697–706.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G., Fodor, J. A. & Garrett, M. (1966). The psychological segmentation of speech. Paper presented at the International Congress of Psychology,Moscow.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G., Lackner, J. R. & Kirk, R. (1969). The underlying structures of sentences are the primary units of speech processing. PerceptPsychophys 5. 225–31.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G., Mehler, J. R. & Valian, V. V. (1970). Linguistic capacity of very young children. In Bever, T. G. & Weksel, W. (eds), The acquisition of structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One word at a time: the use of single word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1974). Talking, understanding and thinking. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Language perspectives: acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L. (1966). Prompted recall of sentences. JVLVB 6. 203–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogan, P. (1968). The nesting constraint in child language. Language Behavior Research Laboratory Working Papers 15. Berkeley, Ca: University of California.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (1973). Children's comprehension of relativized English sentences. ChDev 42. 1923–6.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A. (1979). The disappearance scheme. In Keenan, E. (ed.), Studies in developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. (1965). Environmental assistance to the child's acquisition of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1970). How young children describe events in time. In Flores d'Arcais, G. B. & Levelt, W. J. M. (eds), Advances in psycholinguistics. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1973). Non-linguistic strategies and the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition 2. 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. (1977). Strategies and the mapping problem in first language acquisition. In MacNamara, J. (ed.), Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. (1970). ‘Children are nice to understand’: surface structure clues for recovery of a deep structure. BJPsych 61. 397–408.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. (1971). The development of the ability to decenter time. BJPsychol 62. 353–65.Google ScholarPubMed
de Villiers, J. & de Villiers, P. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. JPsycholingRes 2. 267–78.Google ScholarPubMed
de Villiers, J. (1978). Language acquisition. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G., Tager-Flusberg, H., Hakuta, K. & Cohen, M. (1976). Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Unpublished paper, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. L. (1950). Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1970). Discourse agreement: how children answer questions. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Escalona, S. (1973). Basic modes of social interaction: their emergence and patterning during the first two years of life. MPQ 19. 205–32.Google Scholar
Feier, C. D. (1977). Comprehension of spoken sentences containing relative clauses by adults of varying ages. Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1971). Recognition of syntactic structures. In Horton, D. L. & Jenkins, J. J. (eds), The perception of language. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. JVLVB 4. 414–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G. & Garrett, M. F. (1974). The psychology of language. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. & Garrett, M. (1967). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. PerceptPsychophys 2. 289–96.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. & Olbrei, I. (1973). Semantic heuristics and syntactic analysis. Cognition 2. 319–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, D. J. & Lynch, R. H. (1969). Decision processes during sentence comprehension: effects of surface structure on decision time. PerceptPsychophys 5. 145–8.Google Scholar
Garrett, M. F. (1965). Syntactic structures and judgements of auditory events. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Garrett, M. F., Bever, T. G. & Fodor, J. A. (1966). The active use of grammar in speech perception. PerceptPsychophys 1. 30–2.Google Scholar
Gough, P. B. (1960). Grammatical transformation and speed of learning. JVLVB 4. 107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakes, D., Evans, J. & Brannon, L. (1976). Understanding sentences with relative clauses. MemCog 4. 283–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Hakes, D. & Foss, D. (1970). Decision processing during sentence comprehension: effects of surface structure reconsidered. PerceptPsychophys 8. 413–16.Google Scholar
Hart, B. (1975). The use of adult cues to test the language competence of young children. JChLang 2. 105–24.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Broadbent, D. E. (1960). Perception of sequence in auditory events. QJExp-Psychol 13. 162–70.Google Scholar
Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
MacNamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning infants. PsychRev 79. 1–13.Google Scholar
McLean, J. E. & Snyder, L. K. (1978). A transactional approach to early language training. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. & Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In Luce, R. D, Bush, R. R. & Galanter, E. (eds), Handbook in mathematical psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. & Isard, S. (1964). Free recall of self-embedded English sentences. Information and Control 7. 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Some evidence for the cognitive primacy of categorization and its functional basis. MPQ 19. 21–39.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. PsychRev 81. 267–85.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. (1977). Facilitating children's syntax acquisition. DevPsychol 13. 101–7.Google Scholar
Olds, H. F. (1968). An experimental study of syntactic factors influencing children's comprehension of certain complex relationships. Center for Research and Development on Educational Differences, 4. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In Mussen, P. H. (ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology. 3rd edn.New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. (1977). The adaptive significance of linguistic input to pre-linguistic infants. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Savin, H. & Perchonock, E. (1965). Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences. JVLVB 4. 348–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. JVLVB 13. 272–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, A. (1977). On strategies for processing relative clauses: a comparison of children and adults. JVLVB 4. 305–18.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. (1967). Acquisition du langage et développement de la pensée. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Sinclair-de-Zwart, H. (1973). Language acquisition and cognitive development. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1970). Universals of grammatical development in children. In Flores d'Arcais, G. B. & Levelt, W. J. M. (eds), Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1971). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Dingwall, W. O. (ed.), A survey in linguistic science. College Park: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies in child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Smedslund, J. (1961 a). The acquisition of conservation of substance and weight in children. I. ScandJPsych 2. 11–20.Google Scholar
Smedslund, J. (1961 b). The acquisition of substance and weight in children. III. Extinction of conservation of weight acquired ‘normally’ and by means of empirical controls as a balance scale. ScandJPsych 2. 85–7.Google Scholar
Smith, M. D. (1974). Relative clause formation between 29–36 months: a preliminary report. PRCLD 8. 104–10.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1972). Mother's speech to young children learning language. ChDev 43. 549–65.Google Scholar
Stolz, W. S. (1967). A study of the ability to decode grammatically novel sentences. JVLVB 6. 867–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavakolian, S. L. (1977). Structure and function in child language. Unpublished dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Walker, E. (1969). Grammatical relations in sentence memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Wallach, G. P. (1977). The implications of different language comprehension strategies in learning disabled children: effects of thematization. Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Wolhill, J. F. & Lowe, R. C. (1962). Experimental analysis of the development of the conservation of number. ChDev 33. 153–67.Google Scholar