Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:08:29.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why do children fail to overgeneralize the progressive inflection?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Stan A. Kuczaj II
Affiliation:
Southern Methodist University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Address for correspondence: Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275.

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. ChDev 39. 433–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Ervin, S. (1964). Imitation and structural change in children's language. In Lenneberg, E. (ed.), New directions in the study of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. (1976). -ing, -s, and -ed: a study of the acquisition of certain verb inflections. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. (in press). The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. JVLVB.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1963). Syntactic structures in the language of children. ChDev 34. 407–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Menyuk, P. (1964). Alternation of rules in children's grammar. JVLVB 3. 480–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1969). Sentences children use. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1971 a). Data for the symposium. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1971 b). On the learning of morphological rules. In Slobin, D. (ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar