Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:13:22.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When memorized instances compete with rules: The case of number-noun agreement in written French

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2007

PIERRE LARGY
Affiliation:
University of Toulouse le Mirail, France Requests for reprints should be addressed to Pierre Largy, Université de Toulouse le Mirail, U.F.R. de Psychologie, F-31058 Toulouse cedex 9, France.
MARIE-PAULE COUSIN
Affiliation:
University of Toulouse le Mirail, France
PETER BRYANT
Affiliation:
Oxford University, UK
MICHEL FAYOL
Affiliation:
University of Clermont-Ferrand & CNRS, France

Abstract

It is claimed by Totereau, Thévenin & Fayol (1997) that French children understand the rule for spelling the plural inflection very early on. However, no evidence contradicts the alternative that they learn the spelling of a word's singular and plural forms by treating the two forms as entirely different words. We tested this by asking French first and second graders (85 six-year-old and 89 seven-year-old children, respectively) to read and write rare words, either in just the singular or in just the plural, and then testing their spelling. The children tended to attach plural inflections to words which they had encountered only as plural and to omit them from words encountered before only as singular.

Type
Note
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by the Ministère de la Jeunesse, de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche (Ecole et Sciences cognitives: décision n ° 03 3 179, projet AF 13).