Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:06:31.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What can frequency effects tell us about the building blocks and mechanisms of language learning?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2015

INBAL ARNON
INBAL ARNON*
Affiliation:
Hebrew University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 274 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbot-Smith, K., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage based account of syntactic acquisition. Linguistic Review, 23, 275–290.Google Scholar
Arnon, I,. & Cohen Priva, U. (2013). More than words: the effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech, 56, 349–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M. (2012). Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: how order-of- acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition, 122, 292–305.Google Scholar
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning. Psychological Science, 19, 241–248.Google Scholar
Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cognitive Science, 34, 1131–1157.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211.Google Scholar
Gomez, R. L., & Lakusta, L. A. (2004). A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 7, 567–580.Google Scholar
Hale, J. (2006). Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science, 30, 609–642.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2010). Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology, 61(1), 23–62.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, M. M. M., Theakston, A. L., & Lieven, E. V. (2009). Can input explain children's me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language, 36, 1091–1114.Google Scholar
Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177.Google Scholar
Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children's first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. (eds), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168–196). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101–B111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S. M. (2013). Error and expectation in language learning: the curious absence of ‘mouses’ in adult speech. Language, 89, 760–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K., & Thorpe, K. (2010). The effects of feature-label order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science, 34, 909–957.Google Scholar
Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2007). Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 1–23.Google Scholar
Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition, Wiley Interdisciplinary Review Cognitive Science, 1, 906–914.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, G. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61, 569–613.Google Scholar