Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:27:09.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

To attend or not to attend to unwelcome reanalyses? A reply to Pinker*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Ernst L. Moerk
Affiliation:
California State University, Fresno

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Forner, M. (1977). The mother as LAD: interaction between order and frequency of parental input and child production. Paper presented at the 6th annual University of Minnesota Linguistics Symposium.Google Scholar
Moerk, E. L. (1980). Relationships between parental input frequencies and children's language acquisition: a reanalysis of Brown's data. JChLang 7. 105–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1981). On the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. JChLang 8. 477–84.Google ScholarPubMed