Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:23:50.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tense and aspect in sentence interpretation by children with specific language impairment*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

LAURENCE B. LEONARD  and
PATRICIA DEEVY
LAURENCE B. LEONARD*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
PATRICIA DEEVY
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
Address for correspondence: Laurence B. Leonard, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, 500 Oval Drive, Heavilon Hall, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) are sensitive to completion cues in their comprehension of tense. In two experiments, children with SLI (ages 4 ; 1 to 6 ; 4) and typically developing (TD) children (ages 3 ; 5 to 6 ; 5) participated in a sentence-to-scene matching task adapted from Wagner (2001). Sentences were in either present or past progressive and used telic predicates. Actions were performed twice in succession; the action was either completed or not completed in the first instance. In both experiments, the children with SLI were less accurate than the TD children, showing more difficulty with past than present progressive, regardless of completion cues. The TD children were less accurate with past than present progressive requests only when the past actions were incomplete. These findings suggest that children with SLI may be relatively insensitive to cues pertaining to event completion in past tense contexts.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , March 2010 , pp. 395 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported in part by research grant R01 DC00458 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health. The authors thank Jeanette S. Leonard, Hope Gulker, Lisa Weil, Elgustus Polite, Jessie Grskovic, Andrea Miller, Ashley Flad, Megan Garrity, Amanda Niehaus, Heather Redden, Selena Willett, Gernise Dixon and Emily Ernstberger for their assistance in this project.

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association (2005). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV. Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F. & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 3, 167–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of inflection in child language. Language 56, 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgemeister, B., Blum, L. & Lorge, I. (1972). Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. & Dunn, L. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. & Rice, M. (1994). Preference for verb interpretation in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 182–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L., Deevy, P., Kurtz, R., Krantz Chorev, L., Owen, A., Polite, E., Elam, D. & Finneran, D. (2007). Lexical aspect and the use of very morphology by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 759–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L., Eyer, J., Bedore, L. & Grela, B. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, 741–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V., Wulfeck, B. & Ellis Weismer, S. (1999). Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: a study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norbury, C. F., Bishop, D. V. M. & Briscoe, J. (2001). Production of English finite verb morphology: a comparison of SLI and mild-moderate hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 165–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oetting, J. & Horohov, J. (1997). Past-tense marking by children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, 62–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penner, Z., Schulz, P. & Wymann, K. (2003). Learning the meaning of verbs: what distinguishes language-impaired children from normally developing children? Linguistics 41, 289–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plante, E. & Vance, R. (1994). Selection of preschool language tests: a data-based approach. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 25, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynell, J. & Gruber, C. (1990). Reynell Developmental Scales: US Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Rice, M. (2003). A unified model of specific and general language delay: grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation. In Levy, Y. & Schaeffer, J. (eds), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of SLI, 63–94. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rice, M. & Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 39, 1239–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M., Wexler, K. & Cleave, P. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38, 850–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M., Wexler, K. & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41, 1412–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M., Wexler, K. & Redmond, S. (1999). Grammaticality judgments of an extended optional infinitive grammar: evidence from English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42, 943–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, P. & Wittek, A. (2003). Opening doors and sweeping floors: what children with specific language impairment know about telic and atelic verbs. In Beachley, B., Brown, A. & Conlin, F. (eds), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Language Development, Vol. 2, 727–38. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R. (1995). The acquisition of tense–aspect morphology: a prototype account. Language 71, 743–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (1997). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, L. (2001). Aspectual influences on early tense comprehension. Journal of Child Language 28, 661–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weist, R., Wysocka, H., Witkowska-Stadnik, K., Buczowska, E. & Konieczna, E. (1984). The defective tense hypothesis: on the emergence of tense and aspect in child Polish. Journal of Child Language 11, 347–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, E. & Kresheck, J. (1983). Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test – II. Dekalb, IL: Janelle.Google Scholar
Wiig, E., Secord, W. & Semel, E. (2004). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals – Preschool 2. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2005). International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems (10 Revision). Geneva.Google Scholar