Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:17:21.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Television as a talking picture book: a prop for language acquisition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Dafna Lemish  and
Mabel L. Rice
Dafna Lemish
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Mabel L. Rice
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study provides longitudinal observations of young children's behaviours while viewing television in their own homes, over a time when the children were actively involved in the process of language acquisition. Sixteen children were observed for a period ranging from 0; 6 to 0;8. At the beginning, their ages ranged from 0; 6.15 to 5.15; at the end, from 1; 2.15 to 3;0. The observations yielded documentation of an overwhelming and consistent occurrence of language-related behaviours among children and parents in the viewing situation. The categories of child and adult talk are reported, with description and examples of each category. The categories are compared with those reported for parent–child interactions outside the viewing experience, – in particular joint book-reading. A model of television as a talking picture book is proposed. It is argued that television has the potential to serve as a facilitator of children's language acquisition.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 251 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, D. R. (1983). Home television viewing by preschool children and their families. Paper presented at the biennial convention of the Society for Research on Child Development,Detroit,Michigan.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., Alwitt, L. F., Lorch, E. P. & Levin, S. R. (1979). Watching children watch television. In Hale, G. & Lewis, M. (eds), Attention and the development of cognitive skills. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., Field, D. E. & Sanders, J. (1981). The effects of TV program comprehensibility on preschool children's visual attention to television. ChDev 52. 151–57.Google Scholar
Ball, S. & Bogatz, G. A. (1970). The first year of Sesame Street: an evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Ball, S. & Bogatz, G. A. (1972). Summative research on Sesame Street: implications for the study of preschool children. In Pick, A. D. (ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology, Vol. 6. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., Newport, E. L. & Gleitman, H. (1984). The current status of the motherese hypothesis. JChLang 11. 43–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Goddard, M., Durkin, K. & Rutter, D. R. (1985). The semantic focus of maternal speech: a comment on Nino and Bruner (1978). J ChLang 12. 209–14.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M. & Smith, J. H. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. & Branscombe, A. (in press). The book as narrative prop in language acquisition. In Schieffelin, B. & Gilmore, P. (eds), The acquisition of literacy: Ethnographic perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. & Shatz, M. (1982). Linguistic input and the child's acquisition of language. PsychBull 92. 3–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Hollenbeck, A. R. (1978). Television viewing patterns of families with young infants. J SocPsych 105. 259–64.Google Scholar
Huston, A. C. & Wright, J. C. (1983). Longitudinal analyses of children's home television viewing. Funded grant proposal submitted to the National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
Huston, A. C., Wright, J. C., Rice, M. L., Kerkman, D., Seigle, J. & Bremer, M. (1983). Family environment and television use by preschool children. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development,Detroit,Michigan.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. O. (1977). Making it last: repetitions in children's discourse. In Ervin-Tripp, S. & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (eds), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lemish, D. (1984). The ‘pampered’ Sesame Street viewer. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lemish, D. (in press). Viewers in diapers: the early development of television viewing. In Lindlof, T. R. (ed.), Natural audiences: qualitative research of media uses and effects. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. & Mervis, C. A. (1982). Leopards are kitty-cats: object labelling by mothers for their thirteen-month-olds. ChDev 53. 267–73.Google Scholar
Ninio, A. (1980). Picture-book reading in mother–infant dyads belonging to two subgroups in Israel. ChDev 51. 587–90.Google Scholar
Ninio, A. (1983). Joint book reading as a multiple vocabulary acquisition device. DevPsych 19. 445–51.Google Scholar
Ninio, A. & Bruner, J. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. JChLang 5. 1–15.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. L. (1978). A pedagogical analysis of recurrent formats on Sesame Street and The Electric Company. Paper presented at the International Conference on Children's Educational Television,Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L. (1983). The role of television in language acquisition. DevRev 3. 211–24.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L. (1984). The words of television. Journal of Broadcasting 28. 445–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. L. & Haight, P. L. (in press). The ‘motherese’ of Mr Rogers: the dialogue of educational television programs. JSHD.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. & Eisenberg, A. R. (1984). Cultural variation in dialogue. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Pickar, J. R. (eds), Communicative competence: acquisition and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1982). On mechanisms of language acquisition: can features of the communication environment account for development? In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Singer, J. L. (1980). The power and limitations of television: a cognitive-affective analysis. In Tannenbaum, P. (ed.), The entertainment function of television. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1984). Parent–child interaction and the development of communicative ability. In Schiefelbusch, R. L. & Pickar, J. (eds.), Communicative competence: acquisition and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds) (1977). Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. & Goldfield, B. A. (1983). Turn the page please: situation-specific language acquisition. J ChLang 10. 551–69.Google Scholar
Watson-Gegeo, K. A. & Boggs, S. T. (1977). From verbal play to talk story: the role of routines in speech events among Hawaiian children. In Ervin-Tripp, S. & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (eds), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1974). Learning to code experience through language. JChLang 1. 243–69.Google Scholar
Wells, G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Language at home and at school, Vol. 2. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar