Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-8qdnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T16:14:02.267Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Talking about comparisons: a study of young children's comparative adjective usage*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Dena Gitterman  and
Judith R. Johnston
Dena Gitterman
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Judith R. Johnston
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores factors other than the concept of comparison which influence the learning of specific comparative adjective forms, namely, (a) the nature of the perceptual input, and (b) the nature of the event. Thirty subjects, age 4; 5 to 7; 9, were asked to describe objects reflecting various attribute differences in both multiple-object comparison and single-object, dynamic-change tasks. Children used comparative adjectives to talk about dynamic changes prior to static comparisons, and attributes based on visual or tactile input were easier than those based on both. These results are interpreted as indicating that perceptual cue redundancy and heterogeneity affects the learning of attribute dimensions, and that children first use the -er suffix in a non-comparative sense.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , October 1983 , pp. 605 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, E. J. (1976). Sizing things up: the acquisition of the meaning of dimensional adjectives. JChLang 3. 205–19.Google Scholar
Bloom, K., Lightbown, P. & Hood, P. (1975). Structure and variation in child language. MonogrSocResChDevel 40 (2, Serial No. 160).Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1972). On the child's acquisition of antonyms in two semantic fields. JVLVB 11. 750–8.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. & Wales, R. (1970). On the acquisition of some relational terms. In Hayes, J. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1976). Comprehension and production of adjectives and seriation. JChLang 3. 369–84.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kučera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Rhode Island: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. & Benedict, H. (1974). The comprehension of relative, absolute, and contrastive adjectives by younger children. JPsycholingRes 3. 333–42.Google Scholar
Palermo, D. S. (1973). More about less: a study of language comprehension. JVLVB 12. 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1967). Six psychological studies. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ricciuti, H. N. (1965). Object grouping and selective ordering behavior in infants 12 to 24 months old. MPQ 11. 129–48.Google Scholar
Sinclair de Zwart, H. (1969). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Elkind, D. & Flavell, J. H. (eds), Studies in cognitive development. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Wannemacher, J. T. & Ryan, M. L. (1978). Less is not more: a study of children's comprehension of ‘less’ in various task contexts. ChDev 49. 660–8.Google Scholar