Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:17:01.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural priming in Spanish as evidence of implicit learning*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2015

PERLA B. GÁMEZ  and
PRIYA M. SHIMPI
PERLA B. GÁMEZ*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago
PRIYA M. SHIMPI
Affiliation:
School of Education, Mills College
*
[*]Address for Correspondence: Perla B. Gámez, Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60660. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study uses a structural priming technique with young Spanish speakers to test whether exposure to a rare syntactic form in Spanish (fue-passive) would increase the production and comprehension of that form. In Study 1, 14 six-year-old Spanish speakers described pictures of transitive scenes. This baseline study revealed that fue-passives were virtually non-existent in children's spontaneous speech. Using the priming technique in Study 2, an additional 56 Spanish-speaking children were exposed to fue-passive or active picture descriptions; we varied whether children repeated the modeled form. With repetition, production of fue-passives increased past baseline usage. When not asked to repeat, comprehension and production of fue-passives was no different than chance. Results extend the existing literature by experimentally testing input effects on the production and comprehension of infrequently used constructions, further corroborating the relation between input frequency and language skill. Findings are consistent with the view that an implicit learning mechanism guides language learning.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 207 - 233
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adobe (2005). InDesign CS. (version 3.0·1) [software program]. San Jose, CA: Adobe Systems Incorporated.Google Scholar
Allen, S. E. & Crago, M.B. (1996). Early passive acquisition in Inuktitut. Journal of Child Language 23, 129–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedore, L. M., Fiestas, C. E., Pena, E. D. & Nagy, V. J. (2006). Cross-language comparisons of maze use in Spanish and English in functionally monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencini, G. M. L. & Valian, V. (2008). Abstract sentence representation in 3-year-olds: evidence from comprehension and production. Journal of Memory and Language 59,97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A. & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J. & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Persistence of emphasis in language production: a cross-linguistic approach. Cognition 112, 300–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18, 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F. & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition 104, 437–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, K. & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, K. & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition 35, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohman, T. M., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Mendez-Perez, A. & Gillam, R. B. (2010). What you hear and what you say: language performance in Spanish–English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 13, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J. & Cleland, A. A. (1999). Syntactic priming in written production: evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6, 635–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, P. & Tomasello, M. (1999). Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology 35, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, F., Dell, G. S. & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113, 234–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K. & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: a comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, A. A. & Pickering, M. J. (2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language 49, 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1990). Locatives, impersonals and expletives in Sesotho. Linguistic Review 7, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., Moloi, F. & Machobane, M. (2010). 3-year-olds’ comprehension, production, and generalization of Sesotho passives. Cognition 115, 238–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espinoza, A. M. (1997). Contrastive analysis of the Spanish and English passive voice in scientific prose. English for Specific Purposes 6, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, V. S. & Bock, J. K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 21, 1011–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gámez, P. B., Shimpi, P. M., Waterfall, H. & Huttenlocher, J. (2009). Priming a perspective in Spanish monolingual children: the use of syntactic alternatives. Journal of Child Language 36, 269–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gámez, P. B. & Vasilyeva, M. (2015). Increasing second language learners’ production and comprehension of developmentally-advanced syntactic forms. Language Learning & Development 11, 128–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldwater, M. B., Tomlinson, M., Echols, C. H. & Love, B. C. (2011). Structural priming as structure-mapping: young children use analogies from previous utterances to guide sentence production. Cognitive Science 35, 156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, R. L. & Gerken, L. A. (2001). Artificial language learning as a means for investigating language acquisition. In Tomasello, M. & Bates, E. (eds), Essential readings in language development, 42–48. Oxford & NY: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Green, J. N. (1975). On the frequency of passive constructions in modern Spanish. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies LII, 345–362.Google Scholar
Harris, F. N. & Flora, J. A. (1982). Children's use of get passives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 11, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J. & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish–English bilinguals. Psychological Science 15, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review 26, 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E. & Levine, S. C. (2002). Language input at home and at school: relation to syntax. Cognitive Psychology 45, 337–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M. & Shimpi, P. (2004). Syntactic priming in young children. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 182–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J. & Hedges, L. (2010). Sources of variability in children's language growth. Cognitive Psychology 61, 343–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaeger, T. F. & Snider, N. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition 127, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jisa, H., Reilly, J. S., Verhoeven, L., Baruch, E. & Rosado, E. (2002). Passive voice constructions in written texts: a cross-linguistic developmental study. Written Language and Literacy 4, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J. & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory &Cognition 39, 381–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology 48, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maratsos, M., Fox, D. E. C., Becker, J. A. & Chalkley, M. A. (1985). Semantic restrictions on children's passives. Cognition 19, 167–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P. & McLean, J. F. (2011). Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children's short and full passives. Cognition 121, 268–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F. & Sorace, A. (2012). Is young children's passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 66, 568–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernandez, S., Lewedag, V. & Oller, D. K. (1997). Input factors in lexical learning of bilingual infants (ages 10 to 30 months). Applied Psycholinguistics 18, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 633–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134, 427–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, A. (1992). The acquisition of passive in Spanish and the question of A-chain maturation. Language Acquisition 2, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, C. & Quixtan Poz, P. (1988). Precocious passives (and antipassives) in Quiché Mayan, Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 27, 71–80.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española & Asociación de Academias de la Lengua (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Rowland, C., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. & Lieven, E. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition 125, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274, 1926–1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. Developmental Science 6, 557–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: the persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development 2, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimpi, P. M., Gámez, P. B., Huttenlocher, J. & Vasilyeva, M. (2007). Syntactic priming in 3- and 4-year-old children: evidence for abstract representations of transitive and dative forms. Developmental Psychology 43, 1334–1346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzman, S. M. (1987). Passives and prototypes in Zulu children's speech. African Studies 46, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolchinsky, L. & Rosado, E. (2005). The effect of literacy, text type, and modality on the use of grammatical means for agency alternation in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 209–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74, 209–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooley, K. M. & Bock, K. (2014). On the parity of structural persistence in language production and comprehension. Cognition 132, 101–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasilyeva, M., Huttenlocher, J. & Waterfall, H. (2006). Effects of language intervention on syntactic skill levels in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology 42, 164–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasilyeva, M. & Waterfall, H. (2012). Beyond syntactic priming: evidence for activation of alternative syntactic structures. Journal of Child Language 39, 258–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H., Gámez, P. B., Gómez, L. E., Bowers, E. & Shimpi, P. (2010). Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 37, 1047–1064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasilyeva, M., Waterfall, H. & Gomez, L. (2011). Using priming procedures with children. In Hoff, E. (ed.), The guide to research methods in child language 162–176. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernice, M., Pickering, M. & Hartsuiker, R. (2012). Thematic emphasis in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 27, 631–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehurst, G., Ironsmith, M. & Goldfein, M. (1974). Selective imitation of the passive construction through modeling. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 17, 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, R. W. (1991). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery–Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W. & Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F. (1995). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery–Revised, Spanish Form. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar