Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:17:23.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strategies used to communicate route directions by telephone: a comparison of the performance of 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds and adults*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Peter Lloyd*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
*
Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Abstract

Standard outcome measures used in a referential communication (route finding) task showed that 7-year-olds were inferior to 10-year-olds and adults in terms of adequacy of messages provided (as speakers) and selection of referent (as listeners). Because the task involved negotiation of route directions by telephone, a richer dialogue resulted than is usual in referential communication studies. This made possible an analysis of the strategies used and revealed differences untapped by the standard measures. The types of strategies used (COMPONENTS, NUMBERING, DIRECTIONAL, MINIMAL) varied as a function of age, with the adults using much directional information and the children very little. Much of the younger children's description was either minimal or used inadequately specified mature strategies. Adults frequently used dual strategies (e.g. directional + numbering). Older children showed little evidence of these individually but achieved them, in practice, through dialogue with their partners. Age differences in quantity of communication (number of turns) were found to be linked to strategy use. The advantages of the telephone as an experimental medium of communication are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The help of Elena Lieven and Carole McCaffrey, who were involved in the planning and execution of this research, is gratefully acknowledged. I also wish to acknowledge the cooperation of the pupils and staff of Wadeson Road Primary School.

References

REFERENCES

Asher, S. R. (1978). Referential communication. In Whitehurst, G. J. & Zimmerman, B. J. (eds), The Junctions of language and cognition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boada, H. (1986). El desarollo de la communication en el nino. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Dickson, W. P. (ed.) (1981). Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dickson, W. P. (1982). Two decades of referential communication research: a review and meta-analysis. In Brainerd, C. J. & Pressley, M. (eds), Verbal processes in children. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Evans, M. A. & Rubin, K. H. (1979). Hand gestures as a communicative mode in school-age children. Journal of Genetic Psychology 135. 189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R. M. & Higgins, E. T. (1975). The development of referential communication skills. In Horowitz, F. D. (ed.), Review of child development research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. (1990 a). Children's communication in the school years. In Hughes, M. & Grieve, R. (eds), Understanding children: essays in honour of Margaret Donaldson. Oxford: Blackwell (in the press).Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. (1990 b). The ability to communicate route directions by telephone: a comparison of the performance of 7-year-olds, 10-year-olds and adults. Psicologia de Lenguas (in the press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, P. & Beveridge, M. C. (1981). Information and meaning in child communication. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. J. & Whittaker, S. J. (1986). Learning about verbal referential communication in the early school years. In Durkin, K. (ed.), Language development in the school years. Beckenham, Kent: Groom Helm.Google Scholar