Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:16:19.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some contributions of mothers' speech to their children's syntactic growth*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Erika Hoff-Ginsberg
Erika Hoff-Ginsberg
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Parkside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between mothers' speech and the rate of child syntax growth for 22 2½-year-old children whose speech was sampled at two-month intervals over a six-month period. The relations which appeared suggest that linguistic experience does contribute to syntax development, but that the relation between linguistic input and language growth is different for different domains of language and at different points in the course of development. The results further suggest that there are multiple bases to the benefit of input to language acquisition. One mechanism particularly suggested by the findings is that children analyse the distributional properties of the speech they hear and may induce linguistic structure from the relationship between the structural properties of adjacent utterances in discourse.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 367 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1979). A functionalist approach to the acquisition of grammar. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Cazden, C. & Bellugi, U. (1968). The child's grammar from I to III. In Hill, J. (ed.), The 1967 Minnesota symposium on child psychology, Vol. 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, D. & Chomsky, N. (1980). Linguistic perspectives on language development. In Caplan, D. (ed), Biological studies of mental processes. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Cross, T.G. (1977). Mothers' speech adjustments: the contribution of selected child listener variables. In Snow, C. and Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Cross, T.G. (1978). Mothers' speech and its association with linguistic development in young childen. In Waterson, N. & Snow, C. (eds), The development of communication. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Furrow, D., Nelson, K. & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers' speech to children and syntactic development: some simple relationships. JChLang 6. 423–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Gleitman, L. R., Newport, E. L. & Gleitman, H. (1984). The current status of the motherese hypothesis. JChLang 11. 43–79.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. & Shatz, M. (1982). Linguistic input and the child's acquisition of language. PsychBull 92. 3–26.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. & Chalkley, A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Moerk, E. (1972). Principles of dyadic interaction in language learning. MPQ 18. 229–57.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L., Meier, R. P. & Newport, E. L. (in prep.). Structural packaging in the. input to language learning: intonational and morphological marking of constituents in an artificial language.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L. & Newport, E. L. (1981). The role of constituent structure in the induction of an artificial language. JVLVB 20. 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. E. (1976). Facilitating children's syntax acquisition. DevPsych 13. 101–7.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. (1980). Theories of the child's acquisition of syntax: a look at rare events and at necessary, catalytic, and Irrelevant components of mother–child conversation. AnnNYAcSci 345. 45–67.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E., Carskaddon, G. & Bonvillian, J. D. (1973). Syntax acquisition: impact of experimental variation in adult verbal interaction with the child. ChDev 44. 497–504.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. & Nelson, K. (1978). Cognitive pendulums and their linguistic realization. In Nelson, K. E. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 1. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E., Denninger, M., Kaplan, B. & Bonvillian, J. D. (1979). Varied angles on how children progress in syntax. Paper presented to the Society for Research in Child Development, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. R. (1977). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1981). A theory of the acquisition of lexical-interpretive grammars. In Bresnan, J. (ed), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1971). Production of utterances and language acquisition. In Slobin, D. I. (ed), The ontogenesis of grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M., Hoff-Ginsberg, E. & Maclver, D. (forthcoming). The effects of enriched input on children's acquisition of auxiliary verbs.Google Scholar