Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T14:10:45.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restrictions on addition: children's interpretation of the focus particles auch ‘also’ and nur ‘only’ in German*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2011

FRAUKE BERGER  and
BARBARA HÖHLE
FRAUKE BERGER*
Affiliation:
Linguistics Department, University of Potsdam
BARBARA HÖHLE
Affiliation:
Linguistics Department, University of Potsdam
*
Address for correspondence: Frauke Berger, Linguistics Department, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children up to school age have been reported to perform poorly when interpreting sentences containing restrictive and additive focus particles by treating sentences with a focus particle in the same way as sentences without it. Careful comparisons between results of previous studies indicate that this phenomenon is less pronounced for restrictive than for additive particles. We argue that this asymmetry is an effect of the presuppositional status of the proposition triggered by the additive particle. We tested this in two experiments with German-learning three- and four-year-olds using a method that made the exploitation of the information provided by the particles highly relevant for completing the task. Three-year-olds already performed remarkably well with sentences both with auch ‘also’ and with nur ‘only’. Thus, children can consider the presuppositional contribution of the additive particle in their sentence interpretation and can exploit the restrictive particle as a marker of exhaustivity.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 383 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center ‘Information structure’ – SFB 632, Project C3 ‘L1-Acquisition of linguistic means to mark information structure: Prosodic, syntactic and lexical aspects’. We are grateful to Nadja Kühn, Caroline Magister, Eva Gercke, Silvia Dobler, Anne Adelt, Maja Stegenwallner and Marie Zielina for assistance in recruiting and testing participants, to Antje Sauermann and Silvana Poltrock for their support in the statistical analyses of the data, and to Robin Hörnig, Thomas Weskott and Malte Zimmermann, as well as to Edith L. Bavin and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Bates, D. M., Maechler, M. & Dai, B. (2008). lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes. (R package version 0.999375-31) [Software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Bergsma, W. (2002). Children's interpretations of Dutch sentences with the focus particle alleen (‘only’). In Lasser, I. (ed.), The process of language acquisition: Proceedings of the 1999 GALA Conference, 263–80. Frankfurt (Main): Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bergsma, W. (2006). (Un)stressed ook in Dutch. In van Geenhoven, V. (ed.), Semantics in acquisition, 329–48). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, J. & SzendrŐi, K. (2006). Acquisition of focus marking in European Portuguese – Evidence for a unified approach to focus. In Torrens, V. & Escobar, L.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages, 319–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Ni, W. & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing and modularity. In Clifton, C., Frazier, L. & Rayner, K. (eds), Perspectives on sentence processing, 443–67. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to research on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davies, C. & Katsos, N. (2010). Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations? Lingua 120(8), 1956–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, C. (2009). Stepping stones and stumbling blocks: Why negation accelerates and additive particles delay the acquisition of finiteness in German. In Dimroth, C. & Jordens, P. (eds), Functional categories in learner language, 137–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drozd, K. & van Loosbroek, E. (1998). Dutch children's interpretation of focus particle constructions. Poster presented at the 23rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
von Fintel, K. (2008). What is presupposition accommodation, again? Philosophical Perspectives 22(1), 137–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gualmini, A., Maciukaite, S. & Crain, S. (2003). Children's insensitivity to contrastive stress in sentences with ONLY. In Arunachalam, S., Kaiser, E. & Williams, A. (eds), Proceedings of PLC 25, 87–110. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Heizmann, T. (2007). Child acquisition of exhaustivity in clefts. In Caunt-Nulton, H., Kulatilake, S. & Woo, I. (eds), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 298–309. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hendriks, P. & Koster, C. (2010). Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition. Introduction to special issue on asymmetries in language acquisition. Lingua 120(8), 1887–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, B., Berger, F., Müller, A., Schmitz, M. & Weissenborn, J. (2009). Focus particles in children's language: Production and comprehension of auch ‘also’ in German learners from 1 year to 4 years of age. Language Acquisition 16(1), 36–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1969). A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In Binnick, R. I., Davison, A., Green, G. & Morgan, J. (eds), Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 98–107. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hornby, P. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behavior 13, 530–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüttner, T., Drenhaus, H., van de Vijver, R. & Weissenborn, J. (2004). The acquisition of the German focus particle auch ‘too’: Comprehension does not always precede production. In Brugos, A., Micciulla, L. & Smith, C. E. (eds), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, on-line supplement. Retrieved from <www.bu.edu/linguistics/BUCLD/supp.html>.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. & Peters, S. (1979). Conventional implicature. In Oh, C.-K. & Dinneen, D. A. (eds), Syntax & Semantics Volume 11: Presupposition, 1–56. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Katsos, N. & Smith, N. (2010). Pragmatic tolerance and speaker–comprehender asymmetries. In Franich, K., Iserman, K. M. & Keil, L. L. (eds), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston Conference in Language Development, 221–32. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kim, C. (2008). Processing presupposition: Verifying sentences with (‘only’). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14(1). Retrieved from, http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol14/iss1/17>.Google Scholar
König, E. (1991). The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (1999). Additive particles under stress. In Strolovitch, D. & Lawson, A. (eds), Proceedings of SALT 8, 111–28. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. (2009). Presupposition and anaphora: Remarks on the formulation of the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 40(3), 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuoka, K. (2004). Addressing the syntax/semantics/pragmatics interface: The acquisition of the Japanese additive particle mo. In Brugos, A., Micciulla, L. & Smith, C. E. (eds), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, On-line supplement. Retrieved from <www.bu.edu/linguistics/BUCLD/supp.html>.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, K., Miyoshi, N., Hoshi, K., Ueda, M., Yabu, I. & Hirata, M. (2006). The acquisition of Japanese focus particles: Dake ‘only’ and mo ‘also’. In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T. & Zaller, C. (eds), Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development, On-line supplement. Retrieved from <www.bu.edu/linguistics/BUCLD/supp.html>.Google Scholar
Müller, A. (2010). Wie interpretieren Kinder nur? Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Informationsstruktur. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Müller, A., Höhle, B., Schmitz, M. & Weissenborn, J. (2009). Information structural constraints on children's early language production: The acquisition of the focus particle auch (‘also’) in German-learning 12- to 36-month-olds. First Language 29(4), 373–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, A., Schulz, P. & Höhle, B. (2011). Pragmatic children: How German children interpret sentences with and without the focus particle only. In Meibauer, J. & Steinbach, M. (eds), Experimental pragmatics/semantics, 79–100. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, A., Schulz, P. & Höhle, B. (in press). How the understanding of focus particles develops: Evidence from child German. In Pirvulescu, M., Cuervo, C., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Steele, J. & Strik, N. (eds), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2010). Somerville: MA, Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Nederstigt, U. (2003). Auch and noch in child and adult German. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notley, A., Zhou, P., Crain, S. & Thornton, R. (2009). Children's interpretation of focus expressions in English and Mandarin. Language Acquisition 16(4), 240–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicatures. Cognition 78, 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A. (2006). From scalar semantics to implicature: Children's interpretation of aspectuals. Journal of Child Language 33, 721–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papafragou, A. & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition 86, 253–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papafragou, A. & Tantalou, N. (2004). Children's computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition 12(1), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., Rowland, C. & Filik, R. (2003). Children's comprehension of sentences with focus particles. Cognition 89, 263–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., White, D., Filik, R. & Jaz, K. (2006). Children's interpretation of ambiguous focus in sentences with ‘only’. Language Acquisition 13(3), 253–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, Z., Tracy, R. & Weissenborn, J. (2000). Where scrambling begins: Triggering object scrambling at the early stage in German and Bernese Swiss German. In Powers, S. M. & Hamann, C. (eds), The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization, 127–64. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 2.11.0) [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 447–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6), 701–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SzendrŐi, K. 2004. Acquisition evidence for an interface theory of focus. In van Kampen, J. & Baauw, S. (eds), Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2003, 457–68. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Taglicht, J. (1984). Message and emphasis. On focus and scope in English. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Zhou, P. & Crain, S. (2010). Focus identification in child Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 37, 965–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed