Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:07:45.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prosody signals the emergence of intentional communication in the first year of life: evidence from Catalan-babbling infants*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2012

NÚRIA ESTEVE-GIBERT*
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain
PILAR PRIETO
Affiliation:
ICREA – Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain
*
Address for correspondence: Universitat Pompeu Fabra – Departament de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge, Edifici Roc Boronat 138, Barcelona – 08018, Spain. tel: 935422409; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

There is considerable debate about whether early vocalizations mimic the target language and whether prosody signals emergent intentional communication. A longitudinal corpus of four Catalan-babbling infants was analyzed to investigate whether children use different prosodic patterns to distinguish communicative from investigative vocalizations and to express intentionality. A total of 2,701 vocalizations from 0;7 to 0;11 were coded acoustically (by marking pitch range and duration), gesturally, and pragmatically (by marking communicative status and specific pragmatic function). The results showed that communicative vocalizations were shorter and had a wider pitch range than investigative vocalizations and that these patterns in communicative vocalizations depended on the intention of the vocalizations: requests and expressions of discontent displayed wider pitch range and longer duration than responses or statements. These results support the hypothesis that babbling children can successfully use a set of prosodic patterns to signal intentional speech.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

An earlier version of this article was presented at the VI Conference on Language Acquisition (Barcelona, 8–10 September 2010). We would like to thank participants at that meeting, and especially S. López-Ornat, J. Trueswell, and L. Bosch. We are grateful to the editor, the action editor and the two reviewers for their comments, which have been very helpful to us in revising the text. We also thank M. Armstrong, J. Borràs-Comes, and S. Berends for the reliability coding, M. M. Vanrell for her help with statistics, and Paolo Roseano for his help with Praat figures, all of them members of the Grup d'Estudis de Prosòdia. Finally, we thank the children and the children's parents for voluntarily taking part in this study. This research has been funded by three research grants awarded by the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, FFI2009-07648/FILO ‘The role of tonal scaling and tonal alignment in distinguishing intonational categories in Catalan and Spanish’, by the Consolider-Ingenio 2010 (CSD2007-00012) Program, and by a grant awarded by the Generalitat de Catalunya to the Grup d'Estudis de Prosòdia (2009SGR-701).

References

REFERENCES

Allwood, J., Cerrato, L., Jokinen, K., Navarretta, C. & Paggio, P. (2007). The MUMIN coding scheme for the annotation of feedback, turn management and sequencing. In Martin, J. C., Paggio, P., Kuehnlein, P., Stiefelhagen, R. & Pianesi, F. (eds), Multimodal corpora for modeling human multimodal behaviour. Special issue of Language Resources and Evaluation 41(3/4), 273–87. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Astruc, L., Prieto, P., Payne, E., Post, B. & Vanrell, M. M. (in press). Tonal targets in early child English, Spanish, and Catalan. Language and Speech.Google Scholar
Balog, H. L. & Brentari, D. (2008). The relationship between early gesture and intonation. First Language 28, 141–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balog, H. L., Roberts, F. & Snow, D. (2009). Discourse and intonation development in the first-word period. Enfance 3, 293304.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L. & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 21, 205226.Google Scholar
Blake, J. & Boysson-Bardies, B. de (1992). Patterns in babbling: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language 19, 5174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.01). University of Amsterdam 2005 [http://www.praat.org/].Google Scholar
Chen, L. & Kent, R. (2009). Development of prosodic patterns in Mandarin-learning infants. Journal of Child Language 36, 7395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Odorico, L. & Franco, F. (1991). Selective production of vocalization types in different communication contexts. Journal of Child Language 18, 475–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, B. L., MacNeilage, P. F., Matyear, C. L. & Powell, J. K. (2000). Prosodic correlates of stress in babbling: An acoustical study. Child Development 71, 1258–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engstrand, O., Williams, K. & Lacerda, F. (2003). Does babbling sound native? Listener responses to vocalizations produced by Swedish and American 12- and 18-month-olds. Phonetica 60, 1744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flax, J., Lahey, M., Harris, K. & Boothroyd, A. (1991). Relations between prosodic variables and communication function. Journal of Child Language 18, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, S. & Vigário, M. (2008). The intonation of one-word and first two-word utterances in European Portuguese. Paper presented at the XI International Conference for the Study of Child Language (IASCL).Google Scholar
Furrow, D. (1984). Young children's use of prosody. Journal of Child Language 11(1), 203213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furrow, D., Podrouzek, W. & Moore, C. (1990). The acoustical analysis of children's use of prosody in assertive and directive contexts. First Language 10, 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, R. (1987). Intonation with single words: Purposive and grammatical use. Journal of Child Language 14, 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, J. M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science 16(5), 367–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karousou, A. (2003). Análisis de las vocalizaciones tempranas: su patrón evolutivo y su función determinante en la emergencia de la palabra. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Murray, A. D. (1982). Acoustic features of infant vocalic utterances at 3, 6, and 9 months. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72, 353–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, A. & Utman, J. (1992). From babbling towards the sound systems of English and French: A longitudinal two-case study. Journal of Child Language 19(1), 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1967). Intonation, perception, and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mampe, B., Friederici, A. D., Christophe, A. & Wermke, K. (2009). Newborns' cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology 19(23), 1994–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcos, H. (1987). Communicative functions of pitch range and pitch direction in infants. Journal of Child Language 14, 255–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özçalişkan, S. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition 96, 101113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papaeliou, C., Minadakis, G. & Cavouras, D. (2002). Acoustic patterns of infant vocalizations expressing emotions and communicative functions. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 45(2), 311–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papaeliou, C. F. & Trevarthen, C. (2006). Prelinguistic pitch patterns expressing ‘communication’ and ‘apprehension’. Journal of Child Language 33, 163–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1936). La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., Estrella, A., Thorson, J. & Vanrell, M. M. (2012). Is prosodic development correlated with grammatical and lexical development? Evidence from emerging intonation in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Child Language 39(2), 258–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, Y., MacWhinney, B., Byrne, R., Hedlund, G., Maddocks, K., O'Brien, P. & Warehem, T. (2006). Introducing Phon: A software solution for the study of phonological acquisition. In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T. & Zaller, Colleen (eds), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 489500. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. (1993). The emergence of intentional communication. In Gleason, J. (ed.), The development of language, 4064. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sansavini, B., Guarini, S. & Stefanini, C. (2010). Early development of gestures, object-related actions, word comprehension and word production, and their relationships in Italian infants. Gesture 10(1), 5285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarriá, E. (1991). Observación de la comunicación intencional preverbal: un sistema de codificación basado en el concepto de la categoría natural. Psicotema 3, 359–80.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin 99, 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. (2006). Regression and reorganization of intonation between 6 and 23 months. Child Development 77, 281–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. & Balog, H. L. (2002). Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research. Lingua 112, 1025–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1993). On the interpersonal origins of self-concept. In Neisser, U. (ed.), The perceived self. Ecological and interpersonal knowledge of the self-knowledge, 174–84. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M. & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development 78, 705722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1977). Descriptive analyses of infant communicative behaviour. In Schaffer, H. R. (ed.), Studies in mother–infant interaction, 227–70. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Bullowa, M. (ed.), Before speech, 321–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1982). The primary motives for cooperative understanding. In Butterworth, G. & Light, P. (eds), Social cognition: Studies of the development of understanding, 77109. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, C. (1990). Signs before speech. In Sebeok, T. A. & Sebeok, J. U. (eds), The semiotic web, 689755. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. & DePaolis, R. A. (1998). Perception and production in early vocal development: Evidence from the acquisition of accent. In Gruber, M. C., Higgins, D., Olson, K. S. & Wysocki, T. (eds), Chicago Linguistic Society 34, 373–86.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., DePaolis, R. A. & Davis, B. L. (1998). Is there a ‘trochaic bias’ in early word learning? Evidence from infant production in English and French. Child Development 69, 933947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, B., Welch, K. B. & Galecki, A. T. (2007). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Whalen, D. H., Levitt, A. G. & Wang, Q. (1991). Intonational differences between the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language 18, 501516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed