Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:47:25.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perseverant responding in children's picture naming*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2008

JOSEPHINE BOOTH  and
MELANIE VITKOVITCH
JOSEPHINE BOOTH
Affiliation:
University of East London
MELANIE VITKOVITCH*
Affiliation:
University of East London
*
Address for correspondence: Melanie Vitkovitch, School of Psychology, University of East London, Romford Road, London, E15 4LZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two groups of children were given pictures of animals to name as quickly as they could. The groups comprised 40 nursery aged children (mean age 3 ; 11) and 40 Year 2 children (mean age 6 ; 9) attending primary school in London. The 30 animals were presented one by one, on cards, and any errors made by the children were noted. Consistent with a similar object naming study with adults (Vitkovitch, Kirby & Tyrrell, 1996) and a study with children (Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002), picture naming errors referred to earlier named objects. However, while adults showed below-chance interference from objects that had only just been named (Lag 1), children were most susceptible to interference from very recently named objects (see also Gershkoff-Stowe, 2002). Furthermore, the proportion of younger children making Lag 1 errors was higher than the proportion of older children making Lag 1 errors. The results are discussed in relation to the activation levels of lexical representations.

Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 235 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, J. I. D. (1991). Conditions of error priming in number-fact retrieval. Memory & Cognition 19, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, J. I. D. & Clark, J. M. (1989). Time course of error priming in number-fact retrieval: Evidence for excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15, 920–9.Google Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (2002). Object naming, vocabulary growth, and the development of word retrieval abilities. Journal of Memory and Language 46, 665–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Connell, B. & Smith, L. (2006). Priming overgeneralizations in two- and four-year-old children. Journal of Child Language 33, 461–86.Google Scholar
Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. In Dempster, F. N. & Brainerd, C. J. (eds) Interference and inhibition in cognition, 175–204. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of behavioural research. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 22, 1–75.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardised set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6, 174–215.Google Scholar
Vitkovitch, M. & Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Perseverant naming errors in speeded picture naming: Its in the links. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 17, 664–80.Google Scholar
Vitkovitch, M., Kirby, A. & Tyrrell, L. (1996). Patterns of excitation and inhibition in picture naming. Visual Cognition 3, 61–80.Google Scholar
Vitkovitch, M. & Rutter, C. (2000). The effects of response stimuli interval on error priming in sequential object naming. Visual Cognition 7, 645–70.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, L. R. & Monsell, S. (1994). Inhibition of spoken word production by priming a semantic competitor. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 332–56.Google Scholar
Zellner, M. & Bauml, K. H. (2005). Intact retrieval inhibition in children's episodic recall. Memory & Cognition 33, 396–404.Google Scholar