Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:13:02.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performing without competence*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Ruth Clark
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Speech Therapy

Abstract

Speech in children should be viewed as a developing skill. During acquisition the child becomes increasingly capable of organizing linguistic structure at a number of different levels concurrently. One boy seemed to have strategies for simplifying the tasks of speech reception and production. He would incorporate the immediately prior utterance, or some portion of it, intact into his utterance as if to avoid structuring his entire utterance from scratch. Another strategy was to extend his repertoire of structures to express more complex ideas simply by combining two existing structures without reordering any of the elements to match adult syntax. If such strategies are widespread they may account for the recorded facts about the development of children's question forms. Psychological variables, commonly called performance factors, should not be regarded merely as putting restrictions on the extent to which a child's linguistic knowledge can be expressed. Rather, they affect the manner in which syntactic structures develop. Just as the acquisition of linguistic structure is affected by psychological processes, so is the efficiency of these processes affected in its turn by the child's growing linguistic knowledge.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper appeared in the research report of the Department of Linguistics at Edinburgh University, ‘Work in Progress’, no. 6 (1973). I have been helped in revising the paper by discussions with my colleagues in the research, Sandy Hutcheson, Paul Van Buren and Douglas Young.

References

REFERENCES

Bellugi, U. (1968). Linguistic mechanisms underlying child speech. In Zale, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the conference on language and language behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. (1971). Simplification in children's language. In Huxley, R. & Ingram, E. (eds), Language acquisition: models and methods. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. M. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1968). The development of wh-questions in child speech. JVLVB 7. 279–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J. & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley; London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. (1968). The acquisition of noun and verb inflections. ChD 39. 433–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Cherry, C. (1957). On human communication. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. (forthcoming). Adult theories, child strategies and their implications for the language teacher. In Allen, J. P. B. & Corder, S. P. (eds), Edinburgh course in applied linguistics. London: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Clark, R., Hutcheson, S. & Van Buren, P. (forthcoming). Comprehension and production in language acquisition. JL 10. 3954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. & Van Buren, P. (1973). How a two year old orders words about. Edinburgh Working Papers in Linguistics. 2.Google Scholar
Fitts, P. M. & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. S. (1967). Topicalization in child language. FL 3. 3765.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. (1969). Memory and intelligence in the child. In Elkind, D. & Flavell, J. H. (eds), Studies in cognitive development. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Klima, E. S. & Bellugi, U. (1966). Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (eds), Psycholinguistics papers. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1971). Explaining linguistic universals. In Morton, J. (ed.), Biological and social factors in psycholinguistics. London: Logos Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two. PsychRev 63. 8197.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar. AmPsych 17. 748–62.Google Scholar
Olson, G. M. (1973). Developmental changes in memory and the acquisition of language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair-de-Zwart, H. (1969). Developmental psycholinguistics. In Elkind, D. & Flavell, J. H. (eds), Studies in cognitive development. New York: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1972). Seven questions about language development. In Dodwell, P. C. (ed.) New horizons in psychology 2. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar