Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:24:30.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old and new ways not to study comprehension: comments on Petretic & Tweney's (1977) experimental review of Shipley, Smith & Gleitman (1969)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Lila R. Gleitman ,
Elizabeth F. Shipley  and
Carlota Smith
Lila R. Gleitman
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Elizabeth F. Shipley
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Carlota Smith
Affiliation:
University of Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper rebuts a recent article in this journal (Petretic & Tweney 1977), which claimed to overthrow prior findings of ours. We show that subject populations, methods, and scoring procedures differed materially in the two studies, logically disallowing comparative interpretation of them. We demonstrate that the original study concerned syntactic organization; and that interpretation of it, or of the recent study, as bearing on comprehension is largely unjustified. Finally, we comment on our prior work in the context of new developments and findings about child language which postdate its publication in 1969.

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , October 1978 , pp. 501 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H. & Shipley, E. (1972). The emergence of the child as grammarian. Cognition 1. 137–64.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. (1974). The origin of language comprehension. In Solso, R. S. (ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Newport, E., Gleitman, H. & Gleitman, L. R. (1977) Mother, I'd rather do it myself: some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge, C.U.P.Google Scholar
Petretic, P. A. & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Does comprehension precede production? The development of children's responses to telegraphic sentences of varying grammatical adequacy. JChLang 4. 201–9.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. & Truswell, L. (1978). Comprehension of two-word instructions by children in the one-word stage. JChLang 5. 17–24.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (in press). On the development of communicative understandings: an early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages. CogPsych.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. & Gelman, R. (1973). The development of communication skills: modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 38 No. 5 (Serial No. 152).Google ScholarPubMed
Shipley, E. F., Smith, C. S. & Gleitman, L. R. (1969). A study in the acquisition of language: free responses to commands. Lg 45. 322–43.Google Scholar