Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:43:33.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Object movement in preschool children's word learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2009

JASON SCOFIELD ,
ANDREA MILLER  and
TRAVIS HARTIN
JASON SCOFIELD*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
ANDREA MILLER
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
TRAVIS HARTIN
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
*
Address for correspondence: Jason Scofield, 222 Child Development Research Center, Human Development and Family Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0160. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two studies examined whether preschool children preferred to select a moving object over stationary objects when determining the referent of a novel word. In both studies three- and four-year-olds observed three novel objects, one moving object and two stationary objects. In Study 1, children (n=44) were asked to select the object that best matched a novel word. In Study 2, children (n=45) were asked to select the object that best matched a novel fact. Results across the two studies indicated that three- and four-year-olds showed a preference for selecting the moving object and that this preference was similar for both words and facts. These results suggest that preschool children are able to use movement to determine the referent of a novel word, especially when other cues are unavailable or unhelpful, but that movement may not be uniquely helpful for word learning.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 181 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akhtar, N., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (1996). The role of discourse novelty in early word learning. Child Development 67, 635–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtar, N. & Tomasello, M. (1998). Intersubjectivity in early language learning and use. In Braten, S. (ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny, 316–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint attention. Child Development 63, 875–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word meaning. Journal of Child Language 20, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (eds), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development, 131–58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Behrend, D. A. (1990). Constraints and development: A reply to Nelson, 1988. Cognitive Development 5, 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrend, D. A., Scofield, J. & Kleinknecht, E. E. (2001). Beyond fast mapping: Young children's extensions of novel words and novel facts. Development Psychology 37, 698–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, L. (1998). Language acquisition in its developmental context. In Damon, W., Kuhn, D. & Siegler, R. (eds), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language, 309–370. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. & Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 15, 17–29.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K. & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 64(4) (Serial No. 255).Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1990). On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17, 417–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. B. (1973). A two process model of infant visual attention. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 19, 157–80.Google Scholar
Colunga, E. & Smith, L. B. (2008). Knowledge embedded in process: The self-organization of skilled noun learning. Developmental Science 11, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diesendruck, G. (2005). The principles of conventionality and contrast in word learning: An empirical examination. Developmental Psychology 41, 451–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diesendruck, G. & Markson, L. (2001). Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology 37, 630–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fantz, R. L. (1963). Pattern vision in newborn infants. Science 140, 296–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fantz, R. L. (1964). Visual experience in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science 146, 668–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2006). Baby wordsmith: From associationist to social sophisticate. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15, 30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bloom, L., Smith, L. B., Woodward, A. L., Akhtar, N., Tomasello, M. & Hollich, G. (2000). Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Hollich, G. (1999). Emergent cues for early word learning. In Mac-Whinney, B. (ed.), The emergence of language, 305–331. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Hennon, E. A. & Maguire, M. J. (2004). Hybrid theories at the frontier of developmental psychology: The emergentist coalition model of word learning as a case in point. In Geoffrey Hall, D. & Waxman, S. R. (eds.), Weaving a lexicon, 173–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollich, G., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2007). Young children associate novel words with complex objects rather than salient parts. Developmental Psychology 43, 1051–1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollich, G., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M., with Hennon, E., Chung, H. L., Rocroi, C., Brand, R. J. & Brown, E. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 65(3) (Serial No. 262).Google ScholarPubMed
Houston-Price, C., Plunkett, K. & Duffy, H. (2006). The use of social and salience cues in early word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 95, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hund, A. M. & Plumert, J. M. (2007). What counts as by? Young children's use of relative distance to judge nearbyness. Developmental Psychology 43, 121–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaswal, V. K. & Hansen, M. B. (2006). Learning words: Children disregard some pragmatic information that conflicts with mutual exclusivity. Developmental Science 9, 158–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, M. A. & Woodward, A. L. (2007). Word learning. In Gaskell, G. (ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 617–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markman, E. M. (1990). Constraints children place on word meanings. Cognitive Science 14, 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E. M. & Wachtel, G. F. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20, 121–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markson, L. & Bloom, P. (1997). Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children. Nature 385, 813–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merriman, W. E. & Bowman, L. L. (1989). The mutual exclusivity bias in children's word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 54(3/4) (Serial no. 220).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C., Angelopoulos, M. & Bennett, P. (1999). Word learning in the context of referential and salience cues. Developmental Psychology 35, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 38(1/2) (Serial No. 149).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin-Dubois, D., Graham, S. A. & Riddle, A. S. (1995). Salient object parts and infants' acquisition of novel object words. First Language 15, 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruden, S. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hennon, E. A. (2006). The birth of words: Ten-month-olds learn words through perceptual salience. Child Development 77, 266–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, L. K. & Smith, L. B. (1998). Memory and attention make smart word learning: An alternative account of Akhtar, Carpenter, and Tomasello. Child Development 69, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scofield, J. & Behrend, D. A. (2007). Two-year-olds differentially disambiguate words and facts. Journal of Child Language 34, 875–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, A. M., Morison, V., Town, C. & Rose, D. (1985). Movement perception and identity constancy in the newborn baby. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 3, 211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. B., Jones, B. & Landau, B. (1996). Naming in young children: A dumb attentional mechanism? Cognition 60, 143–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. (eds), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development, 103–129. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Akhtar, N. (1995). Two-year-olds use pragmatic cues to differentiate reference to objects and actions. Cognitive Development 10, 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Haberl, K. (2003). Understanding attention: 12- and 18-month-olds know what is new for other persons. Developmental Psychology 39, 906–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., Strosberg, R. & Akhtar, N. (1996). Eighteen-month-old children learn words in non-ostensive contexts. Journal of Child Language 23, 157–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waxman, S. R. & Booth, A. E. (2000). Principles that are invoked in the acquisition of words, but not facts. Cognition 77, B33–B43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., Cohen, L., Lloyd, V., Casasola, M. & Stager, C. (1998). Acquisition of word object associations by 14-month old infants. Developmental Psychology 34, 1289–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A. (1993). The effect of labeling on children's attention to objects. In Clark, E. V. (ed.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Child Language Research Forum, 35–47. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. L. & Markman, E. M. (1998). Early word learning. In Damon, W., Kuhn, D. & Siegler, R. (eds), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, perception, and language, 371–420. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar