Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T22:19:01.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metaphor processing in middle childhood and at the transition to early adolescence: the role of chronological age, mental age, and verbal intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

Matthias DECKERT Open the ORCID record for Matthias DECKERT [Opens in a new window] ,
Michaela SCHMOEGER ,
Ines SCHAUNIG-BUSCH  and
Ulrike WILLINGER
Matthias DECKERT*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna
Michaela SCHMOEGER
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna
Ines SCHAUNIG-BUSCH
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna
Ulrike WILLINGER
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna
*
*Corresponding author: Matthias Deckert, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. tel: 0043-1-40400-31050; fax: 0043-1-40400-31410; E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Metaphor development in conjunction with verbal intelligence and linguistic competence in middle childhood and at the transition to early adolescence was investigated. 298 individuals between seven and ten years (chronological age) who attended grades two–four (mental age) were tested for metaphor processing by the Metaphoric Triads Task, for linguistic competence (HELD), and verbal intelligence (WISC-III). Chronological age significantly predicted metaphor processing with a breakpoint of 8.2 years regarding identification and comprehension, and 10.2 years regarding preference. Fourth-graders showed highest metaphor processing scores. Verbal intelligence significantly predicted metaphor processing; this effect became stronger with increasing age. Attributional metaphors were best understood and most preferred. Chronological and mental age are associated with metaphor processing in an age span that is seemingly crucial for metaphor development. Verbal analogical reasoning, concept formation, verbal abstraction, and semantic knowledge predicted metaphor comprehension. Understanding facts, principles, and social situations, and resultant inferential verbal reasoning predicted metaphor preference.

Keywords

metaphor processingdevelopmentverbal intelligence
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 334 - 367
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alessandroni, N. (2017). Development of metaphorical thought before language: the pragmatic construction of metaphors in action. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(4), 618–42.Google Scholar
Asch, S., & Nerlove, H. (1960). The development of double function terms in children: an exploratory investigation. In Kaplan, B. & Wapner, S. (Eds.), Perspectives in psychological theory: essays in honor of Heinz Werner (pp. 47–60). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2013). Metaphorically speaking: cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 255–67.Google Scholar
Berk, L. E. (2014). Development through the lifespan, 6th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Billow, R. M. (1981). Observing spontaneous metaphor in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 430–45.Google Scholar
Blakemore, S. J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 267–77.Google Scholar
Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 295–308.Google Scholar
Bonny, J. W., & Lourenco, S. F. (2013). The approximate number system and its relation to early math achievement: evidence from the preschool years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(3), 375–88.Google Scholar
Brain Development Cooperative Group (2012). Total and regional brain volumes in a population-based normative sample from 4 to 18 years: the NIH MRI study of normal brain development. Cerebral Cortex, 22(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. W. (1971). The perception and expression of metaphor as a function of intellectual level and cognitive style. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
Cicone, M., Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1981). Understanding the psychology in psychological metaphors. Journal of Child Language, 8(1), 213–16.Google Scholar
Citron, F. M., Güsten, J., Michaelis, N., & Goldberg, A. E. (2016). Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response. NeuroImage, 139, 218–30.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coney, J., & Lange, A. (2006). Automatic and attentional processes in the comprehension of unfamiliar metaphors. Current Psychology, 25(2), 93–119.Google Scholar
Coulson, S., & Lai, V. T. (2015). Editorial: the metaphorical brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–3. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00699Google Scholar
Del Missier, F., Visentini, M., & Mäntylä, T. (2015). Option generation in decision making: ideation beyond memory retrieval. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1584, 1–16. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01584Google Scholar
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–68.Google Scholar
Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(4), 239–50.Google Scholar
Fair, D. A., Dosenbach, N. U., Church, J. A., Cohen, A. L., Brahmbhatt, S., Miezin, F. M., … & Schlaggar, B. L. (2007). Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(33), 13507–12.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. S. (2017) Development across the life span, 8th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure-mapping: the relational shift. Child Development, 59, 47–59.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In Gibbs, R. W. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109–28). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Smith, L. (2012). Analogical reasoning. In Ramachandran, V. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 130–6). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Tendahl, M. (2006). Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind & Language, 21(3), 379–403.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: from metaphor to idioms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Haught, C. (2006). On the relation between metaphor and simile: when comparison fails. Mind and Language, 21, 360–78.Google Scholar
Godbee, K., & Porter, M. (2013). Comprehension of sarcasm, metaphor and simile in Williams syndrome. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(6), 651–65.Google Scholar
Goldstein, A., Arzouan, Y., & Faust, M. (2012). Killing a novel metaphor and reviving a dead one: ERP correlates of metaphor conventionalization. Brain and Language, 123(2), 137–42.Google Scholar
Grimm, H., & Schoeler, H. (1990). Heidelberg Evaluation of Language Development – HELD [Heidelberger Sprachentwicklungstest – HSET]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Helstrup, T. (1988). The influence of verbal and imagery strategies on processing figurative language. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29(2), 65–84.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26(1), 55–88.Google Scholar
Horton, W. S. (2007). Metaphor and readers’ attributions of intimacy. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 87–94.Google Scholar
Horton, W. S. (2013). Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(3), 148–66.Google Scholar
Huang, S. F., Oi, M., & Taguchi, A. (2015). Comprehension of figurative language in Taiwanese children with autism: the role of theory of mind and receptive vocabulary. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(8/10), 764–75.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, P. R. (1994). Synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. In Dawson, G. & Fischer, K. W. (Eds.), Human behavior and the developing brain (pp. 137–52). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1999). Constructional grounding: the role of interpretational overlap in lexical and constructional acquisition. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. (1991). Developmental versus language-based factors in metaphor interpretation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 470–83.Google Scholar
Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). Developmental levels of processing in metaphor interpretation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Kallady, K. (2015). Review of Therapeutic metaphors for children and the child within. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 32(1), 89–90.Google Scholar
Kasirer, A., & Mashal, N. (2014). Verbal creativity in autism: comprehension and generation of metaphoric language in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and typical development. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00615Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: a computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 257–66.Google Scholar
Kogan, N., & Chadrow, M. (1986). Children's comprehension of metaphor in the verbal and pictorial modality. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 285–95.Google Scholar
Kogan, N., Connor, K., Gross, A., & Fava, D. (1980). Understanding visual metaphor: developmental and individual differences. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1–78.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain's metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–14. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. L. (1980/2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lebel, C., & Beaulieu, C. (2011). Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(30), 10937–47.Google Scholar
Lenroot, R. K., & Giedd, J. N. (2006). Brain development in children and adolescents: insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 718–29.Google Scholar
Lifshitz-Vahav, H., Shnitzer, S., & Mashal, N. (2016). Participation in recreation and cognitive activities as a predictor of cognitive performance of adults with/without Down syndrome. Aging & Mental Health, 20(9), 955–64.Google Scholar
Lutzer, V. D. (1991). Gender differences in preschooler's ability to interpret common metaphors. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(1), 69–74.Google Scholar
Malgady, R. G. (1981). Metric distance models of creativity and children's appreciation of figurative language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(6), 866–71.Google Scholar
Mashal, N., & Kasirer, A. (2012). Principal component analysis study of visual and verbal metaphoric comprehension in children with autism and learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 33(1), 274–82.Google Scholar
Melogno, S., Pinto, M. A., & Levi, G. (2012). Metaphor and metonymy in ASD children: a critical review from a developmental perspective. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1289–96.Google Scholar
Narayanan, S. (1997). KARMA: Knowledge-Based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Nerlich, B., Clarke, D. D., & Todd, Z. (1999). ‘Mummy, I like being a sandwich’: metonymy in language acquisition. In Panther, K.-U. & Radden, G. (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 361–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., & Sullivan, M. P. (1987). Verbal and perceptual analogical reasoning and proportional metaphor comprehension in young children. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 30(3), 367–76.Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, H., Ranta, H., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2016). Individual differences in the processing of written sarcasm and metaphor: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 433–50.Google Scholar
Oosterbaan, R. J. (2002). Drainage research in farmers’ fields: analysis of data - part of project ‘Liquid Gold’ of the International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement. Wageningen, the Netherlands. Retrieved from <https://www.waterlog.info/segreg.htm>..>Google Scholar
Oosterbaan, R. J. (2011). SegReg: Segmented Linear Regression with Breakpoint and Confidence Intervals. Retrieved from <https://www.waterlog.info/segreg.htm>..>Google Scholar
Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary (2010). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionary Online (2017). Retrieved from <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bright>..>Google Scholar
Ozcaliskan, S. (2005). On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: Is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity? Journal of Child Language, 32(2), 291–318.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. (1990). The comprehension of metaphor by preschool children. Journal of Child Language, 17(1), 185–203.Google Scholar
Pereira de Barros, D., Primi, R., Koich Miguel, F., Almeida, L. S., & Oliveira, E. P. (2010). Metaphor creation: A measure of creativity or intelligence? European Journal of Education and Psychology, 3(1), 103–15.Google Scholar
Pérez-Hernández, L., & Duvignau, K. (2016). Metaphor, metonymy, and their interaction in the production of semantic approximations by monolingual children: a corpus analysis. First Language, 36(4), 383–406.Google Scholar
Pouscoulous, N. (2011). Metaphor: For adults only? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 25, 64–92.Google Scholar
Purves, D., Augustine, G. J., & Fitzpatrick, D. et al. (2001). Neuroscience, 2nd en. Sunderland, MA: Sinlauer Associates.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5(3), 159–63.Google Scholar
Royston, P., Altman, D. G., & Sauerbrei, W. (2006). Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Statistics in Medicine, 25(1), 127–41.Google Scholar
Rubio-Fernández, P., & Grassmann, S. (2016). Metaphors as second labels: Difficult for preschool children? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(4), 931–44.Google Scholar
Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010a). The atypical development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children with autism. Autism, 14(1), 29–46.Google Scholar
Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010b). Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 547–63.Google Scholar
Schaunig, I., Willinger, U., & Formann, A. K. (2004). Children's comprehension of metaphoric language. Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie [German Journal of Educational Psychology], 18(1), 53–61.Google Scholar
Schmoeger, M. (2004). Metaphor comprehension and nonverbal abilities. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Sell, M. A., Kreuz, R. J., & Coppenrath, L. (1997). Parents’ use of nonliteral language with preschool children. Discourse Processes, 23(2), 99–118.Google Scholar
Shaw, P., Kabani, N. J., Lerch, J. P., Eckstrand, K., Lenroot, R., Gogtay, N., … & Giedd, J. N. (2008). Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(14), 3586–94.Google Scholar
Silberstein, L. (1980). Autumn leaves and old photographs: a developmental study of metaphor preferences. Technical Report No. 14. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Silberstein, L., Gardner, H., Phelps, E., & Winner, E. (1982). Autumn leaves and old photographs: the development of metaphor. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 135–50.Google Scholar
Siltanen, S. A. (1989). Effects of three levels of context on children's metaphor comprehension. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150(2), 197–215.Google Scholar
Siquerra, M., & Gibbs, R. (2007). Children's acquisition of primary metaphors: a cross-linguistic study. Organon, 43, 161–79.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In Horn, L. R., & Ward, G. (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–32). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (2010). Commentary: a behavioral scientist looks at the science of adolescent brain development. Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 160–4.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (2016). Adolescence, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., Vandell, D., & Bornstein, M. (2010). Development: infancy through adolescence. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka, C., Matsui, M., Uematsu, A., Noguchi, K., & Miyawaki, T. (2012). Developmental trajectories of the fronto-temporal lobes from infancy to early adulthood in healthy individuals. Developmental Neuroscience, 34(6), 477–87.Google Scholar
Tewes, U., Rossmann, P., & Schallberger, U. (1999). Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder - 3: Auflage. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Uda, S., Matsui, M., Tanaka, C., Uematsu, A., Miura, K., Kawana, I., & Noguchi, K. (2015). Normal development of human brain white matter from infancy to early adulthood: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Developmental Neuroscience, 37(2), 182–94.Google Scholar
Vandermorris, S., Sheldon, S., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (2013). Differential contributions of executive and episodic memory functions to problem solving in younger and older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19(10), 1087–96.Google Scholar
Van Herwegen, J., Dimitriou, D., & Rundblad, G. (2013). Development of novel metaphor and metonymy comprehension in typically developing children and Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 1300–11.Google Scholar
Varga, E., Schnell, Z., Tényi, T., Németh, N., Simon, M., Hajnal, A., … & Herold, R. (2014). Compensatory effect of general cognitive skills on non-literal language processing in schizophrenia: a preliminary study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 29, 1–16.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S. (1987). Children and metaphors. Child Development, 58(3), 870–85.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A., Reynolds, R., & Wilson, P. (1984). Sources of difficulty in the young child's understanding of metaphorical language. Child Development, 55(4), 1585–606.Google Scholar
Waggoner, J. E., & Palermo, D. S. (1989). Betty is a bouncing bubble: children's comprehension of emotion-descriptive metaphors. Developmental Psychology, 25(1), 152–63.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1991) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3rd ed. (WISC-III). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wendelken, C., O'Hare, E. D., Whitaker, K. J., Ferrer, E., & Bunge, S. A. (2011). Increased functional selectivity over development in rostrolateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 17260–8.Google Scholar
Whaley, B. B. (1994). ‘Food is to me as gas is to cars?’: Using figurative language to explain illness to children. Health Communication, 6(3), 193–204.Google Scholar
Williams, S. W. (1988). Going west to get east: using metaphors as instructional tools. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 20(1/2), 79–98.Google Scholar
Willinger, U., Deckert, M., Schmoeger, M., Schaunig-Busch, I., Formann, A. K. & Auff, E. (2017). Developmental steps in metaphorical language abilities: the influence of age, gender, cognitive flexibility, information processing speed and analogical reasoning. Language and Speech. doi:10.1177/0023830917746552Google Scholar
Winner, E. (1988/1997). The point of words: children's understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. K., & Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology, 12, 289–97.Google Scholar
Yin, D., Liu, W., Zeljic, K., Wang, Z., Lv, Q., Fan, M., … & Wang, Z. (2016). Dissociable changes of frontal and parietal cortices in inherent functional flexibility across the human life span. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(39), 10060–74.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Deckert et al. supplementary material

Deckert et al. supplementary material 1

Download Deckert et al. supplementary material(File)
File 158.9 KB