Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:10:56.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lexicon–phonology relationships and dynamics of early language development – a commentary on Stoel-Gammon's ‘Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2010

JAN EDWARDS*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
BENJAMIN MUNSON
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
MARY E. BECKMAN
Affiliation:
Ohio State University, Columbus
*
Address for correspondence: Jan Edwards, Department of Communicative Disorders, UW-Madison, Goodnight Hall, 1976 Willow Dr., Madison, WI 53706. Tel: 608 262-6474. Fax: 608 262-6464. Email: [email protected].

Extract

We applaud Stoel-Gammon's (this issue) call for a more comprehensive account of the relationship between lexicon and phonology, and we strongly endorse her suggestions for future research. However, we think that it will not be enough simply to integrate findings and methods from the adult-centered and child-centered literatures. Both of these literatures suggest that we need to rethink standard assumptions about what phonological representations are and how they emerge to support the very large vocabularies that speakers develop over the course of a lifetime. Our commentary focuses on three themes relevant to this reconceptualization.

Type
Review Article and Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This work was supported in part by NIH grant R01 DC02932 and NSF grant BCS0729140 to Jan Edwards, by NSF grant BCS0729277 to Benjamin Munson and by NSF grant BCS0729306 to Mary E. Beckman.

References

REFERENCES

Arbisi-Kelm, T., Edwards, J., Munson, B. & Kong, E.-J. (2010). Cross-linguistic perception of velar and alveolar obstruents: a perceptual and psychoacoustic study. Poster presentation at the Acoustical Society of America, also in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E. (2003). Input representations (inside the mind and out). In Garding, G. & Tsujimura, M. (eds), WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 7094. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E., Munson, B. & Edwards, J. (2007). The influence of vocabulary growth on developmental changes in types of phonological knowledge. In Cole, J. & Hualde, J. (eds), Laboratory Phonology 9, 241–64. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cristià, A. (2009). Individual variation in infant speech processing: implications for language acquisition theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2008). Methodological questions in studying consonant acquisition. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 22, 937–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E. & Munson, B. (2004). The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 421–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holliday, J. J., Beckman, M. E. & Mays, C. (in press). Did you say susi or shushi? Measuring the emergence of robust fricative contrasts in English- and Japanese-acquiring children. InterSpeech2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, E., Munson, B., Li, F., Holliday, J., Beckman, M., Edwards, J. & Schellinger, S. (2009). Why do adults vary in how categorically they rate the accuracy of children's speech? Poster presented at the spring 2009 meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. Also in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 2753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, E.-J., Beckman, M. E. and Edwards, J. (2007). Fine-grained phonetics and acquisition of Greek voiced stops. In Trouvain, J. & Barry, W. (eds), Proceedings of the International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, 865–68. Saarbrucken: University of Saarland.Google Scholar
Li, F., Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2009). Contrast and covert contrast: the phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers. Journal of Phonetics 37, 111–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metsala, J. L. & Walley, A. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (eds), Word recognition in beginning literacy, 89–120. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Munson, B., Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2005 a). Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48, 6178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munson, B., Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2005 b). Phonological knowledge in typical and atypical speech-sound development. Topics in Language Disorders 25, 190206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munson, B., Edwards, J., Schellinger, S. K., Beckman, M. E. & Meyer, M. K. (2010). Deconstructing phonetic transcription: covert contrast, perceptual bias, and an extraterrestrial view of vox humana. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 24, 245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munson, B., Kaiser, E. & Urberg Carlson, K. (2008). Assessment of children's speech production 3: fidelity of responses under different levels of task delay. Poster presented at the 2008 ASHA Convention, Chicago, 20–22 November.Google Scholar
Munson, B., Kurtz, B. A. & Windsor, J. (2005). The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48, 1033–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munson, B., McDonald, E. C., DeBoe, N. L. & White, A. R. (2006). Acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men's sexual orientation from read speech. Journal of Phonetics 34, 202–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2001). Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained. Language and Cognitive Processes 16, 691–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellinger, S., Edwards, J., Munson, B. & Beckman, M. E. (2008). Assessment of children's speech production 1: transcription categories and listener expectations. Poster presented at the 2008 ASHA Convention, Chicago, 20–22 November.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C., Williams, K. & Buder, E. H. (1994). Cross-language differences in phonological acquisition: Swedish and American /t/. Phonetica 51, 146–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storkel, H. L. (2002). Restructuring similarity neighborhoods in the developing mental lexicon. Journal of Child Language 29, 251–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urberg Carlson, K., Kaiser, E. & Munson, B. (2008). Assessment of children's speech production 2: testing gradient measures of children's productions. Poster presented at the 2008 ASHA Convention, Chicago, 20–22 November.Google Scholar
Urberg Carlson, K., Munson, B. & Kaiser, E. (2009). Gradient measures of children's speech production: visual analog scale and equal appearing interval scale measures of fricative goodness. Poster presented at the spring 2009 meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. Also in Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125, 2529.Google Scholar
Walley, A. (1988). Spoken word recognition by young children and adults. Cognitive Development 3, 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar