Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:31:53.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lexical and syllabic patterns in phonological acquisition*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

J. S. Shibamoto
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
D. L. Olmsted
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis

Abstract

Following Ferguson & Farwell (1975), this paper looks at phonological development in lexical terms and extends their method to consideration of syllables within words. Ferguson & Farwell dealt with word-initial consonants only; we attempt to determine whether the sets of phone classes in all positions are the same, whether differences that occur from position to position are primarily within the phone class or in the number and distribution of phone classes at each level in the tree, and what effect position in the syllable has on phone classes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. G. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition Lg 51. 419–39.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1974). Fronting in child phonology. JChLang 1. 233–41.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1942). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Leopold, W. F. (19391949). Speech development of a bilingual child. 4 vols. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Olmsted, D. L. (1971). Out of the mouth of babes. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmsted, D. L. (1977). Some ‘universals’ in recent research on child language. In Juilland, A. (ed.), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg. Saratoga: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Wang, S. Y. (1969). Competing changes as a cause of residue. Lg 45. 925.Google Scholar