Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:17:42.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning transitive verbs from single-word verbs in the input by young children acquiring English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

ANAT NINIO
ANAT NINIO*
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
*
Address for correspondence: Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Psychology, Jerusalem 91905, Israel. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The environmental context of verbs addressed by adults to young children is claimed to be uninformative regarding the verbs' meaning, yielding the Syntactic Bootstrapping Hypothesis that, for verb learning, full sentences are needed to demonstrate the semantic arguments of verbs. However, reanalysis of Gleitman's (1990) original data regarding input to a blind child revealed the context of single-word parental verbs to be more transparent than that of sentences. We tested the hypothesis that English-speaking children learn their early verbs from parents' single-word utterances. Distribution of single-word transitive verbs produced by a large sample of young children was strongly predicted by the relative token frequency of verbs in parental single-word utterances, but multiword sentences had no predictive value. Analysis of the interactive context showed that objects of verbs are retrievable by pragmatic inference, as is the meaning of the verbs. Single-word input appears optimal for learning an initial vocabulary of verbs.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 43 , Issue 5 , September 2016 , pp. 1103 - 1130
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antinucci, F. & Parisi, D. (1975). Early semantic development in child language. In Lennenberg, E. H. & Lennenberg, E. (eds), Foundations of language development: a multidisciplinary approach, Vol. 1, (pp. 189–202). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S. & Berman, R. A. (2003). The emergence of grammar: early verbs and beyond. Journal of Child Language 30, 845–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: studies in the acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. (1980). The case of an (S)VO language: subjectless constructions in Modern Hebrew. Language 56, 759–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, M. R. & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition 81, B33–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1975/76). From communication to language: a psychological perspective. Cognition 3, 255–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, C., Casadio, P. & Bates, E. (1999). A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in Italian. Journal of Child Language 26, 69–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, C. C. Y., Tardif, T., Chen, J., Pulverman, R. B., Zhu, L. & Meng, X. (2011). English- and Chinese-learning infants map novel labels to objects and actions differently. Developmental Psychology 47(5), 1459–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, R. M. W. (2005). A semantic approach to English grammar, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2000). Chapter 1. Introduction. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. Y. (Eds,), Changing valency: case studies in transitivity (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doron, E. (1999). V-movement and VP-ellipsis. In E. Benmamoun & S. Lappin (Eds.), Fragments: studies in ellipsis and gapping (pp. 124–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N., Ibnbari, L. & Taube, S. (2013). Missing objects as topic drop. Lingua 136, 145–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1986). Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. Berkeley Linguistic Society 12, 95–107.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb meaning: the role of analogy in children's interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology 31, 41–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, W. N. & Kučera, H. (1979). Brown corpus manual of information to accompany a standard corpus of present-day American English, revised and amplified. Providence, RI: Brown University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
García-Velasco, D. & Portero Muñoz, C. (2002). Understood objects in functional grammar. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 76, 1–24.Google Scholar
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L. & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition 73, 135–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb learning. Language Acquisition 1, 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2004). Pragmatics and argument structure. In Horn, L. & Ward, G. (eds), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 427–41). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. (2002). An elucidation of null direct object structures in Modern Hebrew. In Mikkelsen, L. & Potts, C. (eds), WCCFL 21: Proceedings of the 21st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 99–112). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S. & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 35, 515–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haegeman, L. (1990). Understood subjects in English diaries: on the relevance of theoretical syntax for the study of register variation. Multilingua 9(2), 157–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, H. & Noyer, R. (2000). Formal versus encyclopedia properties of vocabulary: evidence from nominalisations. In Peeters, B. (ed.), The lexicon–encyclopedia interface (pp. 349–74). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–74.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (1989). Pro-drop in Chinese: a generalized control theory. In Jaeggli, O. & Safir, K. J. (eds), The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 185–214). Dordrecht: Kluwer/Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibbotson, P., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2013). The communicative contexts of grammatical aspect use in English. Journal of Child Language 41(3), 705–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imai, M., Li, L., Haryu, E., Okada, H., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M. & Shigematsu, J. (2008). Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese-, English-, and Japanese-speaking children. Child Development 79, 979–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keren-Portnoy, T., Vihman, M. & Lindop-Fisher, R. (in prep.). Do infants learn from isolated words? An ecological study. University of York and University College London.Google Scholar
Landau, B. & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience: evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, I. (2010). The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 41, 357–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederer, A., Gleitman, L. & Gleitman, H. (1995). Verbs of a feather flock together: structural properties of parental speech. In Tomasello, M. & Merriam, E. (eds), Acquisition of the verb lexicon (pp. 277–97). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lew-Williams, C., Pelucchi, B. & Saffran, J. R. (2011). Isolated words enhance statistical language learning in infancy. Developmental Science 14, 1323–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, D. (2008). Intransitive or object deleting? Classifying English verbs used without an object. Journal of English Linguistics 36, 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. Psychological Review 79, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Massam, D. & Roberge, Y. (1989). Recipe context null objects. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 134–9.Google Scholar
Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meaning. Journal of Child Language 17, 357–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L. & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1995). Input to verb learning: evidence for the plausibility of syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology 31, 827–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninio, A. (1992). The relation of children's single-word utterances to single-word utterances in the input. Journal of Child Language 19, 87–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ninio, A. (2011). Syntactic development, its input and output. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninio, A. (2015). The first vocabulary of transitive verbs in Hebrew is apparently learned from single-word parental utterances. Complementary resource for a poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 20 March 2015. Online: <http://micro5.mscc.huji.ac.il/~msninio/1wd_longtext_online.docx>..>Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Cassidy, K. & Gleitman, L. R. (2007). When we think about thinking: the acquisition of belief verbs. Cognition 105, 125–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Schaffer, H. R., Hepburn, A. & Collis, G. M. (1983). Verbal and nonverbal aspects of parents’ directives. Journal of Child Language 10, 337–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development 57(6), 1454–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. & Kruger, A. (1992). Joint attention on actions: acquiring verbs in ostensive and nonostensive contexts. Journal of Child Language 19, 311–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66(2), 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verlinden, A. & Gillis, S. (1988). Nouns and verbs in the input: Gentner (1982) reconsidered. In Van Besien, F. (ed.), First language acquisition, (pp. 163–87). Antwerp: ABLA.Google Scholar
Zamuner, T. S., Gerken, L. A. & Hammond, M. (2005). The acquisition of phonology based on input: a closer look at the relation of cross-linguistic and child language data. Lingua 10, 1403–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinober, B. W. & Martlew, M. (1985). The development of communicative gestures. In Barrett, M. (ed.), Children's single-word speech (pp. 183–215). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar