Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T14:23:31.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implicit contrast in adjectives vs. nouns: implications for word-learning in preschoolers*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Susan A. Gelman  and
Ellen M. Markman
Susan A. Gelman
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Ellen M. Markman
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On some views of language, when one uses a term to describe or label an object, a contrast is always implied. However, there is an important difference between nouns and adjectives in their contrastive use: adjectives imply a contrast between members of a single noun category, whereas nouns do not imply a contrast between members of a single adjective category. For example, describing a car as new suggests a contrast with other cars. However, labelling it as a car does not as clearly imply a contrast with other new objects. There is no logical necessity for this distinction – it is not captured by the literal meanings of words. Yet it is a conceptual distinction implicit in the use of these terms. In two studies, we tested preschool children's appreciation for this conceptual distinction, using both familiar and unfamiliar words. In Study I, 4-year-olds (but not 3-year-olds) were able to disambiguate the meanings of simple nouns and adjectives by assuming that the adjectives, unlike the nouns, implied a contrast between category members. In Study II, children selected pictures to match totally novel adjectives and nouns (e.g. the fep one, the skub). Relying on part of speech alone, they interpreted these unfamiliar nouns and adjectives differently. Implications for children's use of referential language and word-learning strategies are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 125 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bateman, W. G. (1916). The language status of three children at the same ages. The Pedagogical Seminary 23. 211–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Bohn, W. E. (1914). First steps in verbal expression. The Pedagogical Seminary 21. 578–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1967). Adjectives in English: attribution and predication. Lingua 18. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, W. (1914). The development of a child's vocabulary. The Pedagogical Seminary 21. 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, G. C.(1915). The language of a three-year-old child. The Pedagogical Seminary 22. 89–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. W. (1957). Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. JAbSocPsychol 55. 1–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Carey, S. (1982). Semantic development: state of the art. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Gale, M. C. & Gale, H. (1900). The vocabularies of three children of one family to two and a half years of age. In Gale, H., Psychological Studies, I. Minneapolis, Minn.: the authors.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. & Taylor, M. (1983). Semantic vs. syntactic clues: the proper–common distinction in 2-year-olds. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of Language, 2nd ed.Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J., (1964). Semantic theory and the meaning of ‘good’. JPhilos 61. 739–66.Google Scholar
Katz, N., Baker, E. & Macnamara, J. (1974). What's in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper names. ChDev 45. 469–73.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1966). Towards a ‘notional’ theory of the ‘parts of speech’. JL 2. 209–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1976). Some attributes of adjectives used by young children. Cognition 4. 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, B. J. & Schulz, R. W. (1960). Meaningfulness and verbal learning. Chicago: Lippincott.Google Scholar