Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T14:30:28.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From babbling towards the sound systems of English and French: a longitudinal two-case study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Andrea G. Levitt  and
Jennifer G. Aydelott Utman
Andrea G. Levitt*
Affiliation:
Haskins Laboratories and Wellesley College
Jennifer G. Aydelott Utman
Affiliation:
Haskins Laboratories and Wellesley College
*
Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02181, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The utterances of one French and one American infant at 0;5, 0;8, 0;11, and 1;2 were transcribed and acoustically analysed for syllable duration and vowel formant values. Both general and language-specific effects emerged in the longitudinal study. Initial similarities in the consonantal repertoires of both infants, increasing control in producing target F1 and F2 values, and developmental changes in babbling characteristics over time seem to reflect universal patterns. Yet the babbling of the infants differed in ways that appear to be due to differences in their language environments. Shifts in the infants' sound repertoires reflected phoneme frequencies in the adult languages. The English-learning infant produced more closed syllables, which is characteristic of English, than the French-learning infant. The French-learning infant tended to produce more regularly-timed nonfinal syllables and showed significantly more final-syllable lengthening (both characteristic of French) than the English-learning infant.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 19 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research reported here was supported by grant DC00403 to Haskins Laboratories. Recording of the French infant was begun when the first author was a NATO postdoctoral fellow at the CNRS in Paris, France. Analyses of the data were conducted by the second author as part of a senior honors thesis at Wellesley College. We thank the families of our American and our French infants for their co-operation. We are grateful to the Sloan Foundation and to Wellesley College for additional support for this project. Portions of this paper were presented at the April 1990 conference of the International Conference on Infant Studies in Montreal, Canada. Catherine Best, Alice F. Healy, Michael Studdert-Kennedy and Doug Whalen provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper.

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, K. B., MacWhinney, B. & Stoel, C. (1970). An experiment in the recognition of babbling. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 1, 71–6.Google Scholar
Bond, Z. S., Petrosino, L. & Dean, C. R. (1982). The emergence of vowels: 17 to 26 months. Journal of Phonetics 10, 417–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. de (1989). Material evidence of infant selection from the target language: a cross-linguistic phonetic study. Paper presented at the Conference on Phonological Development, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. de, Halle, P., Sagart, L. & Durand, C. (1989). A cross-linguistic investigation of vowel formants in babbling. Journal of Child Language 16, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. de, Sagart, L. & Durand, C. (1984). Discernible differences in the babbling of infants according to target language. Journal of Child Language 11, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buhr, R. (1980). The emergence of vowels in an infant. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 23, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1965). Comparing the phonetic features of English, German, Spanish and French. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Dinger, M. C. & Blom, J. G. (1973). An investigation of infant babbling. Proceedings from the Institute of Phonetic Sciences (University of Amsterdam), 3, 42–50.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1978). Learning to pronounce: the earliest stages of phonological development in the child. In Minifie, F. D. & Lloyd, L. L. (eds), Communication and cognitive abilities – early behavioral assessment. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Bauer, H. R. (1985). Vocalizations of one-year-olds. Journal of Child Language 12, 491–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konopczynski, G. (1986). Vers un modèle développemental du rhythme français: problèmes d'isochronie réconsidérés à la lumière des données de l'acquisition du langage. Bulletin de I'Institut de Phonétique de Grenoble 15, 157–90.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1975). A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mack, M. & Lieberman, P. (1985). Acoustic analysis of words produced by a child from 46 to 149 weeks. Journal of Child Language 12, 527–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macken, M. A. & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: a study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language 7, 41–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menn, L. (1971). Phonotactic rules in beginning speech. Lingua 26, 225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1971). The acquisition and development of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. & Menn, L. (1979). Early strategies for the perception and production of words and sounds. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (eds), Language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. R. & Kent, R. D. (1990). Phonetic variation in multisyllabic babbling. Journal of Child Language 17, 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, D. K. (1980). The emergence of the sounds of speech in infancy. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanagh, J. F. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Child phonology, vol. 1: Production. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. & Smith, L. (1977). Effect of final-syllable position of vowel duration in infant babbling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62, 994–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oller, D. K., Wieman, L. A., Doyle, W. J. & Ross, C. (1976). Infant babbling and speech. Journal of Child Language 3, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olney, R. & Scholnick, E. (1976). Adult judgements of age and linguistic differences in infant vocalizations. Journal of Child Language 3, 145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. (1945). Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L., Brown-Sweeney, S. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1989). A quantitative analysis of reduplicated and variegated babbling. First Language 9, 175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R. (1980). Stages of speech development in the first year of life. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanaugh, J. F. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Child phonology, vol. 1: Production. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thevenin, D. M., Ellers, R. E., Oller, D. K. & Lavoie, L. (1985). Where's the drift in babbling drift? A cross-linguistic study. Applied Psycholinguistics 6, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M., Macken, M., Miller, R., Simmons, H. & Miller, J. (1985). From babbling to speech: a re-assessment of the continuity issue. Language 61, 397–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihman, M., Ferguson, C. & Elbert, M. (1986). Phonological development from babbling to speech: common tendencies and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics 7, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, R. (1966). Some questions on the child's learning of phonology. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds), The genesis of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wenk, B. J. & Wioland, F. (1982). Is French really syllable-timed? Journal of Phonetics 10, 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D. H., Levitt, A. G. & Wang, Q. (1991). Intonational differences between the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language 18, 501–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed