Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:51:15.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Everyday caretaker talk to toddlers vs. threes and fours*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Frances Fuchs Schachter ,
Diana Fosha ,
Sarah Stemp ,
Nancy Brotman  and
Sonia Ganger
Frances Fuchs Schachter
Affiliation:
Center for Toddler Development, Barnard College, Columbia University
Diana Fosha
Affiliation:
Center for Toddler Development, Barnard College, Columbia University
Sarah Stemp
Affiliation:
Center for Toddler Development, Barnard College, Columbia University
Nancy Brotman
Affiliation:
Center for Toddler Development, Barnard College, Columbia University
Sonia Ganger
Affiliation:
Center for Toddler Development, Barnard College, Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interpersonal functions of everyday caretaker speech usage are examined when addressed to toddlers, threes, and fours. Twelve teachers, 4 at each age level, were each observed for 24 3-minute intervals during free play, and their speech classified into 45 responsive and spontaneous functional categories based on our previously developed classification scheme for spontaneous child speech (Schachter et al. 1974). The results support hypotheses derived from Piagetian theory concerning early developments in ego-differentiation. Speech patterns with increments in speech to toddlers include explicating desires, providing substitutes for prohibitions, reporting on the child, and word teaching, called alter-ego speech. Patterns with increments for threes and/or fours include enhancing the child's ego, assisting him to fulfil desires himself, and encouraging persistence, called ego-supportive speech, as well as modulations (explanations, justifications, etc.) and admonitions with appeals to norms, called ego-socializing speech. Implications for language acquisition are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 221 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, J. W. & Raynor, J. O. (1974). Motivation and achievement. Washington, D.C.: Winston.Google Scholar
Bellugi-Klima, U. H. (1967). The acquisition of the system of negation in children's speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. M. (1968). A new approach to behavioral ecology. In Minnesota symposia on child psychology 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1965). Environmental assistance to the child's acquisition of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1972). Two paradoxes in the acquisition of language structure and function. Paper presented at Conference on the Development of Competence in Early Childhood,Ciba Foundation,London.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B., Baratz, J. C., Labov, W. & Palmer, F. H. (1972). Language development in day care programs. In Grotberg, E. H. (ed.), Day care: resources for decisions. Washington, D.C.: Office of Economic Opportunity, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Cramer, E. M. & Bock, R. D. (1966). Multivariate analysis. RevEducRes 36. 604–17.Google Scholar
Dollard, J. & Auld, F. Jr. (1959). Scoring human motives: a manual. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Drach, K. (1969). The language of the parent: a pilot study. Language Behavior Research Laboratory Working Papers 14. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1964). An analysis of the interaction of language, topic and listener. AmA 66. 86–102.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972 a). Social dialects in developmental sociolinguistics. In Gordon, I. J. (ed.), Early childhood education. (71st Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972 b). On sociolinguistic rules: alternation and co-occurrence. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B. (1973). Code switching in children's language. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. FL 6. 322–61.Google Scholar
Katz, E. W. (1966). A content-analytic method for studying themes of interpersonal behavior. PsychBull 66. 419–22.Google Scholar
Kohut, H. (1968). The psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 23. 86–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Minuchin, P. & Biber, B. (1968). A child development approach to language in the preschool disadvantaged child. In Brottman, M. A. (ed.), Language remediation for the disadvantaged preschool child. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 33. 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, E. N., Carskaddon, G. and Bonvillian, J. D. (1973). Syntax acquisition: impact of experimental variation in adult verbal interaction with the child. ChDev 44, 497–504.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1926). Language and thought of the child. New York: Humanities Press, 3rd edn. 1959.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sachs, J., Brown, R. & Salerno, R. A. (1972). Adults' speech to children. Paper presented at International Symposium on First Language Acquisition,Florence,Italy.Google Scholar
Schachter, F. F., Kirshner, K., Klips, B., Friedricks, M. & Saunders, K. (1974). Everyday preschool interpersonal speech usage: methodological, developmental, and sociolinguistic studies. Mongr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 39.Google Scholar
Schoggen, P. (1963). Environmental forces in the everyday lives of children. In Barker, R. G. (ed.), The stream of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. New York: C.U.P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (in the Press). On the nature of talk to children. In Lenneberg, E. & D. (eds), Foundations of language development.Google Scholar
Snow, E. E. (1972). Mother's speech to children learning language. ChDev 43. 549–65.Google Scholar
Soskin, W. F. & John, V. (1963). The study of spontaneous talk. In Barker, R. G. (ed.), The stream of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Spitz, R. A. (1951). The psychogenic diseases in infancy: an attempt at their etiologic classification. The psychoanalytic study of the child 6. 255–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, B. L. & Watts, J. C. (1973). Experience and environment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2nd edn.Google Scholar