Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:47:24.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Entrainment of prosody in the interaction of mothers with their young children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

EON-SUK KO ,
AMANDA SEIDL ,
ALEJANDRINA CRISTIA ,
MELISSA REIMCHEN  and
MELANIE SODERSTROM
EON-SUK KO
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
AMANDA SEIDL
Affiliation:
Purdue University
ALEJANDRINA CRISTIA
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
MELISSA REIMCHEN
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
MELANIE SODERSTROM*
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba
*
Address for correspondence: Melanie Soderstrom, Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3 T 2N2. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Caregiver speech is not a static collection of utterances, but occurs in conversational exchanges, in which caregiver and child dynamically influence each other's speech. We investigate (a) whether children and caregivers modulate the prosody of their speech as a function of their interlocutor's speech, and (b) the influence of the initiator of the conversation on durational characteristics of the exchange. We analyzed naturalistic conversations from 13 mother–infant/toddler dyads aged 12–30 months across full-day recordings of 3–5 days per dyad using LENA and automated analytic tools. We found small, but significant, effects of mothers and their children influencing each other's speech, particularly in pitch measures. We also found longer utterances and shorter response latencies for the initiator of a conversation. While mothers show more mature conversational capabilities (more entrainment, shorter response latencies), our findings converge with prior research to highlight the active role of young children in the conversational exchange.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 284 - 309
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

Eon-Suk Ko, Institute for Cognitive Science, Seoul National University; Amanda Seidl, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University; Alejandrina Cristia, Laboratoire de Science Cognitives et Psycholinguistiques, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Melissa Reimchen, Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba; Melanie Soderstrom, Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba. This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant NRF-2014S1A5B5A02014474 to EK, and a SSHRC grant 430-2011-0459 to MS. AC acknowledges the institutional support of ANR-10-LABX-0087 and ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02.

References

REFERENCES

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390–412.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B. (2013). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, R package version 1.0-4. Online: <http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Beebe, B., Alson, D., Jaffe, J., Feldstein, S. & Crown, C. L. (1988). Vocal congruence in mother–infant play. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 17, 245–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Begus, K., Gliga, T. & Southgage, V. (2014). Infants learn what they want to learn: responding to infant pointing leads to superior learning, PLoS ONE 9(10), online: <e108817.doi: 10·1371/journal.pone.0108817>.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2013). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.39. Online: <http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/>..>Google Scholar
Brennan, S. E., Galati, A. & Kuhlen, A. K. (2010). Two minds, one dialog: coordinating speaking and understanding. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 53, 301–44.Google Scholar
Buder, E. H., Warlaumont, A. S., Oller, D. K. & Chorna, L. B. (2010). Dynamic indicators of mother–infant prosodic and illocutionary coordination. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody. Online: <https://umdrive.memphis.edu/awarlmnt/www/Buder_Warlaumont_Oller_Chorna_2010.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Cristia, A. (2011). Fine-grained variation in caregivers’ /s/ predicts their infants’ /s/ category. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 3271–80.Google Scholar
De Jong, N. H. & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods 2, 385–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlund, J., Heldner, M. & Hirschberg, J. (2009). Pause and gap length in face-to-face interaction. Proceedings of Interspeech 2009, 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Brighton, UK. Online: <http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/download/fedora_content/download/ac:159987/CONTENT/edlund_al_09.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Elias, G. & Broerse, J. (1996). Developmental changes in the incidence and likelihood of simultaneous talk during the first two years: a question of function. Journal of Child Language 23(1), 201–17.Google Scholar
Feldstein, S., Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Crown, C. L., Jasnow, M., Fox, H. & Gordon, S. (1993). Coordinated interpersonal timing in adult–infant vocal interactions: a cross-site replication. Infant Behavior and Development 16(4), 455–70.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. & Berninger, G. (1981). Timing and turn-taking in children's conversations. Discourse Processes 4, 27–57.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. H. & Schwade, J. A. (2008). Social feedback to infants’ babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychological Science 19(5), 515–23.Google Scholar
Gorisch, J., Wells, B. & Brown, G. J. (2012). Pitch contour matching and interactional alignment across turns: an acoustic investigation. Language and Speech 55(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hermes, D. & van Gestel, J. C. (1991). The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90, 97–102.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. & Naigles, L. (2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development 73(2), 418–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2008). Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science 11(6), F31–9.Google Scholar
Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C. L. & Jasnow, M. D. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: coordinated timing in development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development Serial 66(2). Wiley. Article Stable URL: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3181589>.Google Scholar
Jaffe, J. & Feldstein, S. (1970). Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levitan, R. & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. Proceedings of Interspeech, 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Florence, Italy. Online: <http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~julia/papers/levitan&hirschberg11.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Lieberman, A. F. & Garvey, C. (1977). Interpersonal pauses in preschoolers’ verbal exchanges. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Masataka, N. (1992). Pitch characteristics of Japanese maternal speech to infants. Journal of Child Language 19, 213–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McRoberts, G. W. & Best, C. T. (1997). Accommodation in mean f0 during mother–infant and father–infant vocal interactions: a longitudinal case study. Journal of Child Language 24, 719–36.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198(4312), 75–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27, 169–225.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2013). A language and environment for statistical computing, Version 3·0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online: <http://www.R-project.org>..>Google Scholar
Shimura, Y. & Yamanoucho, I. (1992). Sound spectrographic studies on the relation between Motherese and pleasure vocalization in early infancy. Pediatrics International 34(3), 259–66.Google Scholar
Siegel, G. M., Cooper, M., Morgan, J. L. & Brenneise-Sarshad, R. (1990). Imitation of intonation by infants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 33(1), 9–15.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1977). The development of conversation between mothers and babies. Journal of Child Language 4(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, M. & Wittebolle, K. (2013). When do caregivers talk? The influences of activity and time of day on caregiver speech and child vocalizations in two childcare environments. Plos One 8(11), e80646.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E. & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592.Google Scholar
Striano, T., Henning, A. & Stahl, D. (2006). Sensitivity to interpersonal timing at 3 and 6 months of age. Interaction Studies 7(2), 251–71.Google Scholar
Tice (Casillas), M., Bobb, S. & Clark, E. (2011). Timing in turn-taking: children's responses to their parents’ questions. Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Los Angeles, California, 202–203. Online: <http://projects.ict.usc.edu/nld/semdial2011/proceedings/semdial2011_tice_1.pdf>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tice+(Casillas),+M.,+Bobb,+S.+&+Clark,+E.+(2011).+Timing+in+turn-taking:+children's+responses+to+their+parents’+questions.+Proceedings+of+the+15th+Workshop+on+the+Semantics+and+Pragmatics+of+Dialogue,+Los+Angeles,+California,+202–203.+Online:+.>Google Scholar
Zimmerman, F. J., Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Christakis, D. A., Xu, D., Gray, S. & Yapanel, U. (2009). Teaching by listening: the importance of adult–child conversations to language development. Pediatrics 124(1), 342–9.Google Scholar