Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:11:14.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of feedback on young children's inappropriate word usage*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Kathy L. Chapman ,
Laurence B. Leonard  and
Carolyn B. Mervis
Kathy L. Chapman*
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University
Laurence B. Leonard
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Carolyn B. Mervis
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
*
Kathy L. Chapman, Communication Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study compared the effects of three types of adult feedback (acceptance, correction with joint labelling, and correction with explanation) on young children's inappropriate word usage. Four children were visited in their homes twice a week, from the time they were between 1;1 and 1;3 until they were approximately 1;7. Differential feedback was applied by the experimenter whenever the children extended a term to referents that were inappropriate, but similar to appropriate ones. Comprehension and production probes were administered prior to, during, and following the feedback trials to assess changes in word usage over time. Results indicated that the three types of feedback varied in their relative effectiveness in facilitating a positive change in word usage. Correction with explanation was more effective than correction with joint labelling, which in turn was more effective than simple acceptance.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 101 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research reported was part of a dissertation conducted by the first author and submitted in partial fulfilment of degree requirements at Purdue University. Appreciation is extended to the parents who allowed their children to participate. The comments and suggestions provided by Richard G. Schwartz and Macalyne Fristoe are gratefully acknowledged. Carolyn B. Mervis's work on this project was supported in part by grant number BNS 81-21169 from the National Science Foundation.

References

REFERENCES

Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Chapman, K. (1984). Inappropriate word usage in young children: a longitudinal investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Chapman, K. & Leonard, L. B. (1981). Inappropriate word extensions in the speech of young language-disordered children. Paper presented at the University of Wisconsin Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders,Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, J. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. & Kuczaj, S. (1982). Toward a theory of substantive word-meaning acquisition. In Kuczaj, S. (ed.), Language development: Vol. 1. Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gruendel, J. (1977). Referential extension in early language development. ChDev 48. 1567–76.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1981) Tigers and leopards are kitty-cats: mother-child interactions and children's early categories. Paper presented at the Interdisciplinary Conference,Park City, Utah.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1982). Mother-child interaction and early lexical development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1984). Early lexical development: the contributions of mother and child. In Sophian, C. (ed.), Origins of cognitive skills. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. & Canada, K. (1981). Child-basic categories and early lexical development. Paper presented to the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1983). On the existence of competence errors in early comprehension: reply to Fremgen & Fay and Chapman & Thomson. JChLang 10. 431–40.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. (1980). Overextension in early language development. JChLang 7. 321–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J. & Chapman, R. (1977). Who is ‘Daddy’ revisited: the status of two-year-olds' overextended words in use and comprehension. JChLang 4. 359–76.Google Scholar