Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:48:26.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2008

JUDITH C. GOODMAN ,
PHILIP S. DALE  and
PING LI
JUDITH C. GOODMAN*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
PHILIP S. DALE
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico and
PING LI
Affiliation:
University of Richmond
*
Address for correspondence: Judith C. Goodman, Department of Communication Science and Disorders, 303 Lewis Hall, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 64111. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies examining factors that influence when words are learned typically investigate one lexical category or a small set of words. We provide the first evaluation of the relation between input frequency and age of acquisition for a large sample of words. The MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory provides norming data on age of acquisition for 562 individual words collected from the parents of children aged 0 ; 8 to 2 ; 6. The CHILDES database provides estimates of frequency with which parents use these words with their children (age: 0 ; 7–7 ; 5; mean age: 36 months). For production, across all words higher parental frequency is associated with later acquisition. Within lexical categories, however, higher frequency is related to earlier acquisition. For comprehension, parental frequency correlates significantly with the age of acquisition only for common nouns. Frequency effects change with development. Thus, frequency impacts vocabulary acquisition in a complex interaction with category, modality and developmental stage.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , August 2008 , pp. 515 - 531
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Preparation of this article was made possible in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (BCS-0131829) to PL. We thank Shihfen Tu for the initial calculations of age of acquisition from the CDI database and Janet Patterson for her helpful comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to the many child language researchers who contributed data to the CHILDES database that made possible the estimates of input frequency utilized here.

References

REFERENCES

Barrett, M., Harris, M. & Chasin, J. (1991). Early lexical development and maternal speech: a comparison of children's initial and subsequent uses of words. Journal of Child Language 18, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Dale, P. S. & Thal, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Paul, Fletcher & Brian, MacWhinney (eds) Handbook of child language, 96–151. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language 6, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackwell, A. A. (2005). Acquiring the English adjective lexicon: relationships with input properties and adjectival semantic typology. Journal of Child Language 32, 535–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornstein, M. H., Cote, L. R., Maital, S., Painter, K., Park, S., Pascual, L., Pecheux, M., Ruel, J., Venuti, P. & Vyt, A. (2004). Cross-linguistic analysis of vocabulary in young children: Spanish, Dutch, French, Hebrew, Italian, Korean and American English. Child Development 75, 1115–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brent, M. R. & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition 81, B33–B44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In Bresnan, J., Miller, G. & Halle, M. (eds) Linguistic theory and psychological reality, 264–93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choi, S. & Gopnik, A. (1995). Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: a cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language 22, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V. & Hecht, B. F. (1983). Comprehension, production and language acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology 34, 325–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P. S. & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 28, 125–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dromi, E. (1987). Early lexical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59 (5, Serial No. 242).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S. & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual, 2nd ed.Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Kuczaj, S. A. (ed.) Language development: Vol. 2. Language, thought and culture, 301–334. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. & Reznick, J. S. (1990). Early lexical acquisition: rate, content and the vocabulary spurt. Journal of Child Language 17, 171–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Bloom, L., Smith, L. B., Woodward, A. L., Akhtar, N., Tomasello, M. & Hollich, G. (2000). Becoming a word learner: a debate on lexical acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A. & Choi, S. (1990). Do linguistic differences lead to cognitive differences? A cross-linguistic study of semantic and cognitive development. First Language 10, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M., Barrett, M., Jones, D. & Brookes, S. (1988). Linguistic input and early word meaning. Journal of Child Language 15, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M. & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology 27, 236–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Li, P., Burgess, C. & Lund, K. (2000). The acquisition of word meaning through global lexical co-occurrences. In Clark, E. V. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 167–78. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Li, P., Zhao, X. & MacWhinney, B. (2007). Dynamic self-organization and early lexical development in children. Cognitive Science 31, 581–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk, 3rd ed.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Naigles, L. R. and Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language 25, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development 38, 1–2, Serial #149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, J. (2002). Relationships of expressive vocabulary to frequency of reading and television experience among bilingual toddlers. Applied Psycholinguistics 23, 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. L., Oetting, J. B., Marquis, J., Bode, J. & Pae, H. K. (1994). Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 37, 106–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, R. G. & Terrell, B. Y. (1983). The role of input frequency in lexical acquisition. Journal of Child Language 10, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tardif, T., Gelman, S. A. & Xu, F. (1999). Putting the ‘noun bias’ in context: a comparison of English and Mandarin. Child Development 70, 620–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardif, T., Shatz, M. & Naigles, L. (1997). Caregiver speech and children's use of nouns versus verbs: a comparison of English, Italian and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 24, 535–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorndike, E. L. & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, M. & Koda, K. (2005). Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language. Language Learning 55, 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Z. O. & Snow, C. E. (2001). Lexical output as related to children's vocabulary acquisition: effects of sophisticated exposure and support for meaning. Developmental Psychology 37, 265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar