Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:15:41.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Directionality preferences in the interpretation of anaphora: data from Korean and Japanese*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

William O'Grady ,
Yoshiko Suzuki-Wei  and
Sook Whan Cho
William O'Grady
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Yoshiko Suzuki-Wei
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Sook Whan Cho
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent work by Lust and others has led to the prediction that children acquiring left-branching languages will exhibit a preference for backward patterns of anaphora. In this paper, we test this prediction against data from Korean and Japanese and show it to be false. An alternative hypothesis proposing a preference for forward patterns of anaphora is outlined and possible explanations for earlier experimental results supporting Lust's prediction are considered.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 409 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dougherty, R. (1970). A grammar of coordinate conjoined structures. I. Lg 46. 850–98.Google Scholar
Huang, J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. LIn 15. 531–75.Google Scholar
Lust, B. (1981). Constraints on anaphora in child language: a prediction for a universal. In Tavakolian, S. (ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Lust, B. (1983). On the notion ‘Principal Branching Direction’: a parameter in Universal Grammar. In Otsu, Y. et al. (eds), Studies in generative grammar and language acquisition. Tokyo: International Christian University.Google Scholar
Lust, B. & Mangione, L. (1983). The Principal Branching Direction parameter in first language acquisition of anaphora. In Sells, P. & Jones, C. (eds), Proceedings of NELS 13. University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Graduate Linguistics Students Association.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. (1981). Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic (but were ashamed to ask). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. (1983). Grammatical theory: its limits and its possibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W. (1983). Anaphoric relations in the clause and the NP. Papers from the nineteenth meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. 317–28. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W. (1984). The syntax of Korean anaphora. LangRes 20. 81–101.Google Scholar
Solan, L. (1983). Pronominal reference: child language and the theory of grammar. Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terazu, N. (1983). Comments on the paper by Lust. In Otsu, Y. et al. (eds), Studies in generative grammar and language acquisition. Tokyo: International Christian University.Google Scholar
Yang, D.-W. (1982). Control and binding in Korean. LingJ of Korea 7. 257–83.Google Scholar