Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:07:08.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of polite stance in preschoolers: how prosody, gesture, and body cues pave the way

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2019

Iris HÜBSCHER Open the ORCID record for Iris HÜBSCHER [Opens in a new window] ,
Martina GARUFI  and
Pilar PRIETO
Iris HÜBSCHER*
Affiliation:
Departament de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalunya URPP Language and Space, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Martina GARUFI
Affiliation:
Scuola di lettere e beni culturali, Università di Bologna, Italy
Pilar PRIETO
Affiliation:
Departament de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalunya Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, ICREA, Barcelona, Catalunya
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gesture and prosody are considered to be important precursors in early language development. In the present study, we ask whether those cues play a similar role later in children's acquisition of more complex pragmatic skills, such as politeness. 64 three- to five-year-old Catalan-dominant children participated in a request production task in four different conditions. They were prompted to request an object from either a classmate or an unfamiliar adult experimenter, with the implied cost of the request to the receiver's face thus being either high or low. Results showed that these preschool-age children used mitigating prosodic and gestural strategies to encode politeness earlier and more often than they used lexical or morphosyntactic markers, and that those cues develop incrementally during the preschool years. These findings suggest that prosody, gesture, and other body signals are an essential first step in the development of children's socio-pragmatic competence.

Keywords

polite stancepoliteness acquisitionprosodyface and body cuesprosodic mitigationgestural mitigationsocio-pragmatic development
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 46 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 825 - 862
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acredolo, L. P., & Goodwyn, S. W. (1985). Symbolic gesturing in language development. Human Development, 28, 40–9.Google Scholar
Allwood, J., Cerrato, L., Jokinen, K., Navarretta, C., & Paggio, P. (2007). The MUMIN coding scheme for the annotation of feedback, turn management and sequencing phenomena. Language Resources and Evaluation, 41(3/4), 273–87.Google Scholar
Aronsson, K., & Thorell, M. (1999). Family politics in children's play directives. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(1), 25–47.Google Scholar
Astruc, L., Vanrell, M., & Prieto, P. (2016). Cost of the action and social distance affect the selection of question intonation in Catalan. In Armstrong, M. E., Henriksen, N., & Vanrell, M. M. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance (pp. 93–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Axia, G., & Baroni, M. R. (1985). Linguistic politeness at different age levels. Child Development, 56(4), 918–27.Google Scholar
Baroni, M. R., & Axia, G. (1989). Children's meta-pragmatic abilities and the identification of polite and impolite requests. First Language, 9(27), 285–97.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: the acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 21(3), 205–26.Google Scholar
Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Morgenstern, A., & Boutet, D. (2015). A child's multimodal negations from 1 to 4: the interplay between modalities. In P. Larrivée & C. Lee (Eds.), Negation and Polarity: Experimental Perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 95–123). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Benazzo, S., & Morgenstern, A. (2014). A bilingual child's multimodal path into negation. Gesture, 14(2), 171–202.Google Scholar
Bernicot, J., & Legros, S. (1987). Direct and indirect directives: What do young children understand? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43(3), 346–58.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2017). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.30. Retrieved 22 July 2017 from <http://www.praat.org/>..>Google Scholar
Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). Evidence of early language discrimination abilities in infants from bilingual environments. Infancy, 2(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
Briz, A. (2002). La estrategia atenuadora en la conversación cotidiana española. Proceedings of Actas del Primer Coloquio del Programa EDICE, Estocolmo, 17–46. Online <http://www.edice.org/descargas/1coloquioEDICE.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Infant gaze following and pointing predict accelerated vocabulary growth through two years of age: a longitudinal, growth curve modeling study. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), 207–20.Google Scholar
Brown, L., & Winter, B. (2018). Multimodal indexicality in Korean: ‘doing deference’ and ‘performing intimacy’ through nonverbal behavior. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture.Google Scholar
Brown, L., Winter, B., Idemaru, K., & Grawunder, S. (2014). Phonetics and politeness: perceiving Korean honorific and non-honorific speech through phonetic cues. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 45–60.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caffi, C. (1999). On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 881–909.Google Scholar
Capirci, P., Contaldo, A., Caselli, M. C., & Volterra, V. (2005). From action to language through gesture: a longitudinal perspective. Gesture, 5(1/2), 155–77.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 315–30.Google Scholar
Chen, A., & Fikkert, P. (2007). Intonation of early two-word utterances in Dutch. Proceedings of the XVIth ICPhS (pp. 315–20). Dudweiler. Online <https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_59578_2/component/file_59579/content>..>Google Scholar
Chen, A., Gussenhoven, C., & Rietveld, T. (2004). Language-specificity in the perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning. Language and Speech, 47(4), 311–49.Google Scholar
Christophe, A., Nespor, M., Guasti, M. T., & Van Ooyen, B. (2003). Prosodic structure and syntactic acquisition: the case of the head-direction parameter. Developmental Science, 6(2), 211–20.Google Scholar
Colletta, J. M., & Pellenq, C. (2004). Multimodal explanations in French children aged from 3 to 11 years. In Nippold, N. & Scott, C. (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults: development and disorders (pp. 63–97). New York: Psychology Press, Erlbaum, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Colonnesi, C., Stams, G. J. M., Koster, I., & Noom, M. J. (2010). The relation between pointing and language development: a meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 30(4), 352–66.Google Scholar
Dodane, C., & Martel, K. (2009a). Emergence de formats prosodiques stables en français chez des enfants français de 10 à 12 mois. In Enfance, numéro spécial La prosodie et l’émergence du langage, 3. Online <http://colaje.scicog.fr/index.php/realisations/66>>Google Scholar
Dodane, C., & Martel, K. (2009b). Évolution de l'inventaire de contours de Fo chez deux enfants français de 10 à 12 mois : l'importance du contexte pour décrire le stade pré-linguistique. Enfance, 2009(3), 305–16.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hager, J. C. (2002). Facial Action Coding System: manual and investigator's guide. Salt Lake City, UT: Research Nexus.Google Scholar
Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: basic concepts and issues. In Ellyson, S. L. & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–27). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S., & Gordon, D. (1986). The development of children's requests. In Schiefelbusch, R. (Ed.), Communicative competence: assessment and intervention (pp. 61–96). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.Google Scholar
Esteve-Gibert, N., & Guellaï, B. (2018). The links between prosody and gestures: a developmental perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. Online <https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00338/full>..>Google Scholar
Esteve-Gibert, N., Liszkowski, U., & Prieto, P. (2016). Prosodic and gesture features distinguish the pragmatic meaning of pointing gestures in child-directed communication. In Armstrong, M. E., Henriksen, N., & Vanrell, M. M. (Eds.), Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance: approaches across linguistic subfields (pp. 249–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Esteve-Gibert, N., & Prieto, P. (2013). Prosody signals the emergence of intentional communication in the first year of life: evidence from Catalan-babbling infants. Journal of Child Language, 40(5), 919–44.Google Scholar
Esteve-Gibert, N., & Prieto, P. (2014). Infants temporally coordinate gesture–speech combinations before they produce their first words. Speech Communication, 57, 301–16.Google Scholar
Esteve-Gibert, N., & Prieto, P. (2018). Early development of prosody–meaning interface. In Esteve-Gibert, N. & Prieto, P. (Eds.), The development of prosody in first language acquisition (pp. 228–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Esteve-Gibert, N., Prieto, P., & Liszkowski, U. (2017). Twelve-month-olds understand social intentions based on prosody and gesture shape. Infancy, 22(1), 108–29.Google Scholar
Fivero, M. (1976). A speech act analysis of polite verb forms in Romance. Proceedings of 6th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Frota, S., Matos, N., Cruz, M., & Vigário, M. (2016). Early prosodic development: emerging intonation and phrasing in European Portuguese. In Armstrong, M., Vanrell, M. M., & Henriksen, N. C. (Eds.), Issues in Hispanic and lusophone linguistics: interdisciplinary approaches to intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance (pp. 295–324). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Furrow, D. (1984). Young children's use of prosody. Journal of Child Language, 11(1), 203–13.Google Scholar
Georgalidou, M. (2008). The contextual parameters of linguistic choice: Greek children's preferences for the formation of directive speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 72–94.Google Scholar
Givens, D. B. (2001). The nonverbal dictionary of gestures, signs & body language cues, nonverbal communication. Spokane, WA: Center for Nonverbal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B., Perlmann, R. Y., & Greif, E. B. (1984). What's the magic word: learning language through politeness routines. Discourse Processes, 7(4), 493–502.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B., & Weintraub, S. (1976). The acquisition of routines in child language. Language in Society, 5(2), 129–36.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). Beyond words: the importance of gesture to researchers and learners. Child Development (Special Issue: New Direction for Child Development in the Twenty-First Century), 71, 231–9.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Butcher, C. (2003). Pointing toward two-word speech in young children. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 85–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2001). Emotion within situated activity. In Duranti, A. (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: a reader (pp. 239–57). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., Goodwin, C., & Yaeger-Dror, M. (2002). Multimodality in girls’ game disputes. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10/11), 1621–49.Google Scholar
Greif, E. B., & Gleason, J. B. (1980). Hi, thanks, and goodbye: more routine information. Language in Society, 9(2), 159–66.Google Scholar
Guidetti, M. (2002). The emergence of pragmatics: forms and functions of conventional gestures in young French children. First Language, 22(3), 265–85.Google Scholar
Guidetti, M. (2005). Yes or no? How young French children combine gestures and speech to agree and refuse. Journal of Child Language, 32, 911–24.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 898–924.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Tucker, M., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1996). Dynamic systems theory: reinterpreting ‘prosodic bootstrapping’ and its role in language acquisition. Signal to syntax: bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 449–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hollos, M., & Beeman, W. (1978). The development of directives among Norwegian and Hungarian children: an example of communicative style in culture. Language in Society, 7(3), 345–55.Google Scholar
Hornby, P. A., & Hass, W. A. (1970). Use of contrastive stress by preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13(2), 395–9.Google Scholar
Hübscher, I., Borràs-Comes, J., & Prieto, P. (2017). Prosodic mitigation characterizes Catalan formal speech: the Frequency Code reassessed. Journal of Phonetics, 65, 145–59.Google Scholar
Hübscher, I., Wagner, L., & Prieto, P. (2016). Young children's sensitivity to polite stance expressed through audiovisual prosody in requests. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, Boston, (pp. 897–901). Online <https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/SpeechProsody_2016/index.html>..>Google Scholar
Ito, K., Jincho, N., Minai, U., Yamane, N., & Mazuka, R. (2012). Intonation facilitates contrast resolution: evidence from Japanese adults and 6-year olds. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1), 265–84.Google Scholar
Ito, M. (2004). Politeness and voice quality – the alternative method to measure aspiration noise. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, Nara, Japan. Online <https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2004/index.html>..>Google Scholar
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16(5), 367–71.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (1978). Effect of listener age and situation on the politeness of children's directives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7(4), 307–17.Google Scholar
Jarmołowicz-Nowikow, E. (2014). Pointing by hand: types of reference and their influence on gestural form. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – language – communication: an international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38.2) (pp. 1824–33). Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. D. (2001). Broadening the units of analysis in communication: speech and nonverbal behaviours in pragmatic comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28(2), 325–49.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. D., Barr, D. J., Breckinridge Church, R., & Lynch, K. (1999). Offering a hand to pragmatic understanding: the role of speech and gesture in comprehension and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 577–92.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2005). How children and adults produce and perceive uncertainty in audiovisual speech. Language and Speech, 48(1), 29–53.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 841–9.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lin, H., Kwock-Ping, J. T., & Fon, J. (2006). An acoustic study on the paralinguistic prosody in the politeness talk in Taiwan Mandarin. Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, Athens, Greece, (pp. 173–6). Online <http://users.uoa.gr/~abotinis/botinis/Publications%202007/Workshop_2006.pdf>>Google Scholar
Martel, K., & Dodane, C. (2012). Le rôle de la prosodie dans les premières constructions grammaticales: étude de cas d'un enfant français monolingue. Journal of French Language Studies, 22(1), 13–35.Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. (2005). Struck by speech revisited: embodied stance in jurisdictional discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(2), 167–93.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind – what gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: implicit communication of emotions and attitudes (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A. (2014). Children's multimodal language development. In Fäcke, C. (Ed.), Manual of language acquisition (pp. 123–42). Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morris, D. (2002). People watching. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K. (1999). The use of polite language by Japanese children's narratives. Japanese/Korean Linguistics, 3, 84–99.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K. (2002). Polite language usage in mother–infant interactions: a look at language socialization. In Shirai, Y., Kobayashi, S., Miyata, S., & Nakamura, K. (Eds.), Studies in language sciences II (pp. 175–91). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K. (2006). The acquisition of linguistic politeness in Japanese. In Nakayama, M., Mazuka, R., & Shirai, Y. (Eds.), The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: volume II Japanese (pp. 110–15). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., Leonard, L. B., & Anastopoulos, A. (1982). Development in the use and understanding of polite forms in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25(2), 193–202.Google Scholar
Ofuka, E., McKeown, J. D., Waterman, M. G., & Roach, P. J. (2000). Prosodic cues for rated politeness in Japanese speech. Speech Communication, 32(3), 199–217.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41, 1–16.Google Scholar
Ola Orie, O. (2009). Pointing the Yoruba way. Gesture, 9(2), 237–61.Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, Ş., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Do parents lead their children by the hand? Journal of Child Language, 32(3), 481–505.Google Scholar
Özçalişkan, Ş., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). When gesture–speech combinations do and do not index linguistic change. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 190–217.Google Scholar
Papaeliou, C. F., & Trevarthen, C. (2006). Prelinguistic pitch patterns expressing ‘communication’ and ‘apprehension’. Journal of Child Language, 33(1), 163–78.Google Scholar
Payrató, L., & Cots, J. M. (2011). The pragmatics of Catalan. Berlin/Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pedlow, R., Sanson, A., & Wales, R. (2004). Children's production and comprehension of politeness in requests: relationships to behavioural adjustment, temperament and empathy. First Language, 24(3), 347–67.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (2014). Intonational phonology of Catalan. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology II: the phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 43–80). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational meaning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(4), 371–81.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., Estrella, A., Thorson, J., & Vanrell, M. D. M. (2012). Is prosodic development correlated with grammatical and lexical development? Evidence from emerging intonation in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Child Language, 39(2), 221–57.Google Scholar
Read, B., & Cherry, L. (1978). Preschool children's production of directive forms. Discourse Processes, 1, 233–45.Google Scholar
Roseano, P., González, M., Borràs-Comes, J., & Prieto, P. (2016). Communicating epistemic stance: how speech and gesture patterns reflect epistemicity and evidentiality. Discourse Processes, 53(3), 135–74.Google Scholar
Rowe, M. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Early gesture selectively predicts later language learning. Developmental Science, 12(1), 182–7.Google Scholar
Ruiz Santabalbina, M. (2013). Duración y percepción de la cortesía en español (experimento piloto). In Cabedo Nebot, A., Aguilar Ruiz, M. J., & López-Navarro, E. (Eds.), Estudios de lingüística: Investigaciones, propuestas y aplicaciones (pp. 411–25). Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Ryckebusch, C., & Marcos, H. (2004). Speech acts, social context and parent–toddler play between the ages of 1;5 and 2;3. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(5), 883–97.Google Scholar
Sakkalou, E., & Gattis, M. (2012). Infants infer intentions from prosody. Cognitive Development, 27(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Sansavinia, A., Bello, A., Guarini, A., Savini, S., Stefanini, S., & Caselli, M. C. (2010). Early development of gestures, object-related-actions, word comprehension and word production, and their relationships in Italian infants: a longitudinal study. Gesture, 10(1), 52–85.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. (1990). The give and take of everyday life: language socialization of Kaluli children. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1993). Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition. Multilingua, 12, 69–79.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2015). Conventionalization: a new agenda for im/politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 11–18.Google Scholar
Tree, A. R., & Manusov, V. (1998). Managing face concerns in criticism integrating nonverbal behaviors as a dimension of politeness in female friendship dyads. Human Communication Research, 24(4), 564–83.Google Scholar
Uçar, E., & Bal, Ö. A. (2015). Preschoolers’ use of requests. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2, 25–43.Google Scholar
Vanrell, M. M., Feldhausen, I., & Astruc, L. (2018). The Discourse Completion Task in Romance prosody research: status quo and outlook. In Feldhausen, I., Reich, U., & Vanrell, M. M. (Eds.), Methods in prosody: a Romance language perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, L., Vega-Mendoza, M., & Horn, S. V. (2014). Social and linguistic cues facilitate children's register comprehension. First Language, 34(4), 299–314.Google Scholar
Winter, B., & Grawunder, S. (2012). The phonetic profile of Korean formal and informal speech registers. Journal of Phonetics, 40(6), 808–15.Google Scholar