Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:52:15.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computational models and Rethinking innateness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

JEROME A. FELDMAN
Affiliation:
ICSI and UC Berkeley

Abstract

On the whole, I quite like both the target book (RI) and the review by Matthew Rispoli, but there are some additional observations that might be of interest to the readers of this journal. The whole concept of ‘truth through disputation’ is alien to my scientific tradition and I agree with Rispoli that RI is not helped by the polemical tone.

There is a companion volume and software suite by Kim Plunkett & Jeff Elman (1997), Exercises in rethinking innateness, which we have used in an undergraduate cognitive science course. This is, in my opinion, the best source for understanding the main point of RI, which I summarized for the class as: the book tries to show that PDP learning techniques have advanced to the point where we need not assume that tabula rasa learning of language must be ruled out. The Exercises in RI book and particularly doing the on-line examples give the students direct intuition about this claim. Our students were impressed by the Tlearn system, but understood its limitations and were not convinced either of the main claim of RI or of the radical nativist alternative.

Type
REVIEW ARTICLE AND DISCUSSION
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)